LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Guess my dyno numbers!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 05:40 PM
  #16  
SuperbeaSSt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 121
DOh! well hope you get something good. I'd say 320/350.

Last edited by SuperbeaSSt; Aug 16, 2007 at 05:48 PM.
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 08:18 AM
  #17  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
313rwhp and 319lbs. of torque.
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 09:38 AM
  #18  
JustNO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,025
From: Europe
Originally Posted by maybe2fast
that like the exact mods to mine

cc503
promag 1.6
3 angled
ported and polished
11.0:1
918s
boltons
pacesetter LTs and ORY
magnaflow catback
ls1 driveshaft
stock rear
MadZ28 tune

hoping for 350 and the tires
Nope! Your heads are ported, and hp comes from the heads, so..
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #19  
buzz12586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Yea I still have stock heads. Didn't have enough of a budget to get anything done to them. I'm hoping the extra compression will help me some. I am hoping for 330-340.
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 05:53 PM
  #20  
FAST96Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 131
From: SWANSEA MASS
i guess 312hp/347tq
Old Aug 18, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #21  
buzz12586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Well I just got back from the dyno. Put down 330hp/325tq. Great torque curve. Kept above 300tq from 2800-5800.
Old Aug 18, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #22  
BlackbirdWS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 616
From: Piscataway, NJ USA
Well I was closest on rwhp...any prize for that LOL. Congrats.

-Brian
Old Aug 18, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #23  
H82GOSLW's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 214
From: Albany, NY
Talking

Damn, that's the exact setup I'm going with and I was hoping for 350 rwhp on stock heads with that cam. Kinda disappointed. Maybe on the local DynoJet I'll make that number.
Old Aug 18, 2007 | 09:04 PM
  #24  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
Originally Posted by buzz12586
Well I just got back from the dyno. Put down 330hp/325tq. Great torque curve. Kept above 300tq from 2800-5800.
Good #s, now lets have some track times posted up.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #25  
buzz12586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Should hopefully be getting to the track soon. My best time before the rebuild and headers was 13.07 @ 107 in really great weather. Most of the time it was around 13.2 @ 105. Hoping for mid 12's once I get used to launching it again.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 08:45 AM
  #26  
buzz12586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by H82GOSLW
Damn, that's the exact setup I'm going with and I was hoping for 350 rwhp on stock heads with that cam. Kinda disappointed. Maybe on the local DynoJet I'll make that number.
Well a Mustang dyno reads 7-10% lower than a DynoJet so it probably would have put down at least 350rwhp on a DynoJet.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 11:13 AM
  #27  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by buzz12586
Well a Mustang dyno reads 7-10% lower than a DynoJet so it probably would have put down at least 350rwhp on a DynoJet.

...and with some other dyno tricks, perhaps 360+ is possible

Let's see some track numbers
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #28  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Originally Posted by buzz12586
Well a Mustang dyno reads 7-10% lower than a DynoJet so it probably would have put down at least 350rwhp on a DynoJet.
Some mustang dyno's read higher than dynojets these days. Either way dyno racing is stupid anyway.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 02:09 PM
  #29  
buzz12586's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Oh I know that dyno's are just for tuning. I just wanted to make sure that my setup was putting out near what it should.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 02:35 PM
  #30  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Originally Posted by buzz12586
Oh I know that dyno's are just for tuning. I just wanted to make sure that my setup was putting out near what it should.
The only way to tell if its running how it should is to get some track #'s. I laugh everytime I see someone post up track results with a trap speed around 116mph or less when they dyno'd 400+rwhp.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.