LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Is getting rid of theMAF screen good or bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 12:50 AM
  #1  
razeak1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 77
From: Mason, WV, USA
Is getting rid of theMAF screen good or bad?

Thanks for the answers.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 12:53 AM
  #2  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,152
From: Woodstown, NJ
Sure.

Aftermarket MAFs don't have a screen, so why should mine? Although the purpose of having the screen is to provide the heated elements of the MAF a laminar stream of air, I've never had a problem with varied MAF readings, and mine has been out for close to three years now. Other people might tell you differently, but in my instance, I say go for it.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 12:53 AM
  #3  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
id leave it alone...could cause probs. removing it...u wont gain anything from the removal anyway
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 12:54 AM
  #4  
razeak1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 77
From: Mason, WV, USA
Oh, I got rid of it 2 weeks ago, but I hear some people didn't like it, i was wondering what the problem was, in case it would be something I would run into.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 12:57 AM
  #5  
razeak1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 77
From: Mason, WV, USA
I felt a slight change in the car after doing it. I did it after reading an LT1 tips article in a Chevy High Performance, and they dynoed an extra couple of hp out of it.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 12:57 AM
  #6  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,152
From: Woodstown, NJ
Symptoms can range from a number of things, including erratic idle, poor throttle response, etc., from what I understand.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 01:18 AM
  #7  
revtime's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,734
From: Kansas City suburb of
You will notice there are two distinctly different schools of thought on this, Polar opposites actually.
Bottom line, if you don,t have any problems then leave it out.
FWIW mine has been gone for 5 years now.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 03:36 AM
  #8  
anaik's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,335
From: Cleveland,OH
Here's some more discussion on the subject.

http://web.camaross.com/forums/searc...der=descending
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 03:41 AM
  #9  
TobyZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,325
From: BC
Removing the screen "might" throw the calibration off. After market ones, without the screen, are calibrated for airflow without the screen. If your calibration is off, it might feel good initially until the computer, now getting an incorrect reading, adjusts the F/A ratio to something it actually shouldn't be. If ya take it off and it works for a while, great Otherwise put it back on i guess...
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 05:26 AM
  #10  
Dan Oldham's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 273
From: Frederick, Maryland USA
I figure it's there for a reason, so I've just left mine alone. It's sort of like the "coolant bypass" free mod. I figure GM has coolant going to the throttlebody for a reason.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 09:52 AM
  #11  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
The first thing you need to realize is much of the suggestions you read in car mags are BS.

I bought a used MAF and descreened it, ported it and even polished it. Kept my stocker.

Was told by Ed, when I had my PCM programmed for cam that I should put the stocker back on.

That was good enough for me.JMHO
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #12  
FyreLance's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 240
From: Huber Heights, OH
Originally posted by Dan Oldham
I figure it's there for a reason, so I've just left mine alone. It's sort of like the "coolant bypass" free mod. I figure GM has coolant going to the throttlebody for a reason.
As I understand it, it's a cold weather thing. I won't drive my 'birds on snowy or icy days, so... I'll probably do it
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 01:31 PM
  #13  
Z95m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,070
From: newton, kansas, USA
i descreened and ported my maf when i first got the car. It changed my BLM's and didn't add any noticeable gain. I now have a unmolested MAF in my car.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 01:34 PM
  #14  
Lyle A's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 553
From: Central Cal.
Originally posted by Dan Oldham
I figure it's there for a reason, so I've just left mine alone. It's sort of like the "coolant bypass" free mod. I figure GM has coolant going to the throttlebody for a reason.
I've seen dyno tests that show the by-pass can give you a few ponies. Unless you live at the north pole, you shouldn't need coolant heating up your throttle body.
Old Aug 29, 2003 | 03:19 PM
  #15  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
I finally found a printout of some dyno tests a guy had posted on the 'net several years ago. The site is gone now, but he used the dyno at Dynotech in Dallas to run a few of the popular LT1 mod's.

Info from the website:

Owner: Markus Strobl
Car:
96 Z28 M6
Mods: Borla catback, Moroso CAI, HPP+, home ported heads, 1.6RR's.

Results:

Remove MAF screen:

HP = 1.1 HP gain
Torque = 0.4 ft-lb LOSS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM.