Is getting rid of theMAF screen good or bad?
Sure.
Aftermarket MAFs don't have a screen, so why should mine? Although the purpose of having the screen is to provide the heated elements of the MAF a laminar stream of air, I've never had a problem with varied MAF readings, and mine has been out for close to three years now. Other people might tell you differently, but in my instance, I say go for it.
Aftermarket MAFs don't have a screen, so why should mine? Although the purpose of having the screen is to provide the heated elements of the MAF a laminar stream of air, I've never had a problem with varied MAF readings, and mine has been out for close to three years now. Other people might tell you differently, but in my instance, I say go for it.
You will notice there are two distinctly different schools of thought on this, Polar opposites actually.
Bottom line, if you don,t have any problems then leave it out.
FWIW mine has been gone for 5 years now.
Bottom line, if you don,t have any problems then leave it out.
FWIW mine has been gone for 5 years now.
Removing the screen "might" throw the calibration off. After market ones, without the screen, are calibrated for airflow without the screen. If your calibration is off, it might feel good initially until the computer, now getting an incorrect reading, adjusts the F/A ratio to something it actually shouldn't be. If ya take it off and it works for a while, great
Otherwise put it back on i guess...
Otherwise put it back on i guess...
The first thing you need to realize is much of the suggestions you read in car mags are BS.
I bought a used MAF and descreened it, ported it and even polished it. Kept my stocker.
Was told by Ed, when I had my PCM programmed for cam that I should put the stocker back on.
That was good enough for me.JMHO
I bought a used MAF and descreened it, ported it and even polished it. Kept my stocker.
Was told by Ed, when I had my PCM programmed for cam that I should put the stocker back on.
That was good enough for me.JMHO
Originally posted by Dan Oldham
I figure it's there for a reason, so I've just left mine alone. It's sort of like the "coolant bypass" free mod. I figure GM has coolant going to the throttlebody for a reason.
I figure it's there for a reason, so I've just left mine alone. It's sort of like the "coolant bypass" free mod. I figure GM has coolant going to the throttlebody for a reason.
Originally posted by Dan Oldham
I figure it's there for a reason, so I've just left mine alone. It's sort of like the "coolant bypass" free mod. I figure GM has coolant going to the throttlebody for a reason.
I figure it's there for a reason, so I've just left mine alone. It's sort of like the "coolant bypass" free mod. I figure GM has coolant going to the throttlebody for a reason.
I finally found a printout of some dyno tests a guy had posted on the 'net several years ago. The site is gone now, but he used the dyno at Dynotech in Dallas to run a few of the popular LT1 mod's.
Info from the website:
Owner: Markus Strobl
Car:
96 Z28 M6
Mods: Borla catback, Moroso CAI, HPP+, home ported heads, 1.6RR's.
Results:
Remove MAF screen:
HP = 1.1 HP gain
Torque = 0.4 ft-lb LOSS
Info from the website:
Owner: Markus Strobl
Car:
96 Z28 M6
Mods: Borla catback, Moroso CAI, HPP+, home ported heads, 1.6RR's.
Results:
Remove MAF screen:
HP = 1.1 HP gain
Torque = 0.4 ft-lb LOSS


