getting rid of emissions crap
getting rid of emissions crap
the ppl who've pulled out all the emissions stuff, do you feel a difference as far as power? i mean, is it worth? these cars produce lots of pollution without all that crap.
Re: getting rid of emissions crap
Originally posted by rage366
the ppl who've pulled out all the emissions stuff, do you feel a difference as far as power? i mean, is it worth? these cars produce lots of pollution without all that crap.
the ppl who've pulled out all the emissions stuff, do you feel a difference as far as power? i mean, is it worth? these cars produce lots of pollution without all that crap.
Things like AIR, EGR and EEC don't operate at WOT, so other than the SMALL weight penalty, there is no way they can hurt performance (assuming the systems are properly maintained). You could also consider the PCV system to be an emissions system, and bit of a clutter, but you would be foolish to remove it, unless you added an alternative system.
Removing EGR will likely cause increased emissions of NOx under part load, low RPM conditions. These conditions are used for rolling (dyno) emissions testing, so it might cause problems with passing NOx. The quench effect of the exhaust gas replacing air (oxygen) under part load, low RPM conditions can actually reduce the liklihood of detonation from lugging the engine in the wrong gear.
Removing AIR will simply mean it takes the cats longer to heat up. Since the worst polution comes from the engine on cold start, removing AIR increases emissions dramatically, but this conditon is typically not tested during rolling emissions checks. Of course if you've already lost the cats, AIR is useless.
EEC recovers HC vapors that would vent to atmosphere. In effect, it will net you a SMALL fuel mileage increase, since EEC puts these vapors into your combustion chambers. The car may also have a problem with gasoline fumes without the EEC system. I know when mine wasn't working the fumes from the C16 racing fuel brought tears to my eyes when the window was open.
Removing EGR will likely cause increased emissions of NOx under part load, low RPM conditions. These conditions are used for rolling (dyno) emissions testing, so it might cause problems with passing NOx. The quench effect of the exhaust gas replacing air (oxygen) under part load, low RPM conditions can actually reduce the liklihood of detonation from lugging the engine in the wrong gear.
Removing AIR will simply mean it takes the cats longer to heat up. Since the worst polution comes from the engine on cold start, removing AIR increases emissions dramatically, but this conditon is typically not tested during rolling emissions checks. Of course if you've already lost the cats, AIR is useless.
EEC recovers HC vapors that would vent to atmosphere. In effect, it will net you a SMALL fuel mileage increase, since EEC puts these vapors into your combustion chambers. The car may also have a problem with gasoline fumes without the EEC system. I know when mine wasn't working the fumes from the C16 racing fuel brought tears to my eyes when the window was open.
Originally posted by Hyperspeed97z28
power wise probably not worth it but as far as popping that hood and being able to see the **** you need to, it is worth it.....
power wise probably not worth it but as far as popping that hood and being able to see the **** you need to, it is worth it.....
i dont have a single emmisions device on my car and im LOVIN IT
SOOOOOO much cleaner and nicer to work under the hood!!DOWN WITH THE TREE HUGGER SH*T
BTW its easier to remove that crap if you have headers also
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sleeperZ96BT
Parts For Sale
5
Sep 9, 2015 08:28 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Aug 5, 2015 08:35 AM



