LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

First time to the track.......very pleased

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #1  
Yby4n95Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 662
From: Toledo
First time to the track.......very pleased

Tell me if you guys think my times are about right for the mods or if anything stands out funny. This was run on ET streets w/15psi.


1st run

60ft 1.995
1/8 8.729
1/4 13.641 @ 100.62

2nd run

60ft 1.975
1/8 8.719
1/4 13.616 @ 100.91

3rd run

60ft 1.999
1/8 8.728
1/4 13.605 @ 100.66


Thanks
Adam
Old May 19, 2004 | 08:58 PM
  #2  
wicked_95z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,469
From: J-ville,NC
Sounds about right. My friends 95 with a vortex muffler and Cold air was running that. I'll give you this you are pretty consistant
Old May 19, 2004 | 09:01 PM
  #3  
white97z/28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 164
dam nice times, you are very consistent too. et streets must have hooked good since you pulled 1.9's all day long. I got 2.1's with the street tires.
Old May 19, 2004 | 09:02 PM
  #4  
Kataklysm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,264
From: Boston, MA
It seems like its trapping kinda low. I was running 14.2 (on 7 cylinders) and trapping 96 mph. I know a guy who ran 13.6 totally stock on street tires, is the car running right? His might just be freak car.
Old May 19, 2004 | 09:16 PM
  #5  
Yby4n95Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 662
From: Toledo
Originally posted by Kataklysm
It seems like its trapping kinda low. I was running 14.2 (on 7 cylinders) and trapping 96 mph. I know a guy who ran 13.6 totally stock on street tires, is the car running right? His might just be freak car.
Ya know I thought the trap seemed a bit low as well. I'm not sure though.

The tires hooked excellent I can't complain. Didn't have to really heat them up for a long time either.

I ran it in OD the entire time.
Old May 19, 2004 | 09:29 PM
  #6  
Makaveli's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 452
From: CT
nice times, i like the 60 foots, very consistant as everyone else said too

do ET streets hurt your mph if you arent pushing too much more power than stock?
Old May 19, 2004 | 09:37 PM
  #7  
"White Knight"'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,544
From: Michigan
Trap speed sounds about right to me....maybe 1 or 2mph but that much can vary by a lot of factors day to day.
Old May 19, 2004 | 10:45 PM
  #8  
Yby4n95Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 662
From: Toledo
Originally posted by Makaveli
nice times, i like the 60 foots, very consistant as everyone else said too

do ET streets hurt your mph if you arent pushing too much more power than stock?
Well I was told that the ET's might provide too much rolling resistance and slow me down on the top end, that is why I was curious on the 100MPH trap. But DAMN the 60ft traction is nice

Adam
Old May 19, 2004 | 10:58 PM
  #9  
96WhiteZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 449
From: Queens, NY
My old 1994 firebird formula ran a 14.4 at 103mph it was totally stock but had lots of hesitation and missing under 2500RPM and had 100 pounds of stereo equipment in the trunk. I wish i saved my time slips i don't remember my 60 foot times. I hope to run the camaro in two weeks.
Old May 19, 2004 | 11:00 PM
  #10  
MarkyMark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 958
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Go

Good runs! What gears did you have in stock? Did you notice a good gain from going to 3.73's. I'm curious because I have 2.73's and they suck, looking into getting 3.73's soon and just curious what you think of them.
________
HawtBailee

Last edited by MarkyMark; Sep 14, 2011 at 01:14 PM.
Old May 19, 2004 | 11:09 PM
  #11  
96WhiteZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 449
From: Queens, NY
My old 1994 firebird formula ran a 14.4 at 103mph it was totally stock but had lots of hesitation and missing under 2500RPM and had 100 pounds of stereo equipment in the trunk. I wish i saved my time slips i don't remember my 60 foot times. I hope to run the camaro in two weeks.
Old May 19, 2004 | 11:26 PM
  #12  
Yby4n95Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 662
From: Toledo
Originally posted by MarkyMark
Good runs! What gears did you have in stock? Did you notice a good gain from going to 3.73's. I'm curious because I have 2.73's and they suck, looking into getting 3.73's soon and just curious what you think of them.
Stock gears were 3.23's. The difference was noticable. I can light the tires up much easier. Car slurps gas alot more on the e-way though. About 2700 RPM @ 70

Adam
Old May 19, 2004 | 11:43 PM
  #13  
1badasZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 870
From: Florence Mississippi
turn your fuel pressure down some. they run rich from the factory and you have a 255 so it might be a lil bit richer. just from backing down on mine i dropped 3 tenths, but i had a scanmaster to help tune it
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Feffman
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
4
Oct 9, 2015 05:42 AM
Carguy00
Site Help and Suggestions
1
Aug 6, 2002 10:25 PM
Burmite
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
34
Jul 5, 2002 12:00 AM
Burmite
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
15
Jul 3, 2002 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.