LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Finally...track times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 12:28 AM
  #31  
DrewHMS97SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,917
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Colin91Z
I'm not a believer in the "break it in softly" method...as you can tell
If only clutches played nice out of the box...
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 08:29 AM
  #32  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 968
From: Wichita, KS
My clutch is grabbing just fine I put about 100 miles on it before I started shifting hard
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 08:47 AM
  #33  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by OldSStroker
If you saw the torque/power curves for this combination, which you have not, you might revise your thinking ....nah, I doubt it.

I would email it to you, but then I'd have to shoot you.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Give me a minuite, I'm trying to think of the downside to this scenerio.



Big enough to work. See above for further information.

The poetic keyboard ninja just couldn't help himself, eh?

Perhaps you missed this:
Originally Posted by Colin91Z
Don't turn my thread into 5 page arguement. Take it elsewhere
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 08:55 AM
  #34  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 968
From: Wichita, KS
Guys I don't mind constructive conversation....but please don't turn this thread into one of "those" threads.

By "those" ...you all know exactly what I mean

Last edited by Colin91Z; Oct 29, 2007 at 09:00 AM.
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 01:03 PM
  #35  
96LT1TX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,035
From: Houston, TX
congrats colin,
what kinda DA's are you seeing in KS? I ran a 12.5@110 with my high DA's last weekend, only took a 1.81 60' too, and this is 5400' DAs. With that MPH, you are in the 11s easy. Just keep it up, and dont miss 4th like me! Damn Pro 5.0 shifter... on an f-body.
I am guessing with a 1.8 60' you should see 11.8s@116 (there are people out here running 11.8s@114 with some good 60's... just keep it up).
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #36  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 968
From: Wichita, KS
Originally Posted by 96LT1TX
congrats colin,
what kinda DA's are you seeing in KS? I ran a 12.5@110 with my high DA's last weekend, only took a 1.81 60' too, and this is 5400' DAs. With that MPH, you are in the 11s easy. Just keep it up, and dont miss 4th like me! Damn Pro 5.0 shifter... on an f-body.
I am guessing with a 1.8 60' you should see 11.8s@116 (there are people out here running 11.8s@114 with some good 60's... just keep it up).
Thanks The night I ran, DA was around 2400 I believe. I hope your right about the 11.80, I'll find out on sunday. I may even be able to a pick up some mph, being as I won't have to lift in 1st or 2nd on my M/Ts, and the fact that I'll be running lighter wheels

Who knows, either way I'll post up results sunday evening
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 05:14 PM
  #37  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Originally Posted by Colin91Z
Guys I don't mind constructive conversation....but please don't turn this thread into one of "those" threads.

By "those" ...you all know exactly what I mean
Done.

Good luck at the track. Please let us know where the best shift points are, if you care to.
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #38  
MeanGreen97Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,523
From: TX
My clutch was stinking 10 miles after install. LOL I don't believe in breaking it in easy either.
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 07:18 PM
  #39  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by OldSStroker
If you saw the torque/power curves for this combination you might revise your thinking.

The PCM puts a limit on how high.
Why would it revise my thinking? Are you telling me that cam should be shifted at.. what was the PCM limit? 7K or 7200rpm or eve higher? If that's the case the cams efficiency may come into question. This, of course depends on the final outcome after this combo is dialed in.
Old Oct 29, 2007 | 10:22 PM
  #40  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by OldSStroker
I was correct in my original post. Sorry, Colin.

I don't rightly think so. In order for you to be correct you must at least reply with some logic and/or reason as to why my line of thinking should be revised. You've failed to do so even though questions have been asked pertaining to this combo and my line of thinking.
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 09:02 AM
  #41  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 968
From: Wichita, KS
Originally Posted by OldSStroker
Done.

Good luck at the track. Please let us know where the best shift points are, if you care to.
Thanks, I'll be happy to let you know where it likes being shifted on Sunday

Originally Posted by MeanGreen97Z
My clutch was stinking 10 miles after install. LOL I don't believe in breaking it in easy either.
I waited a little bit long than 10 miles...I did about 100 miles of in-town driving before I started beating on it

Originally Posted by SS RRR
Why would it revise my thinking? Are you telling me that cam should be shifted at.. what was the PCM limit? 7K or 7200rpm or eve higher? If that's the case the cams efficiency may come into question. This, of course depends on the final outcome after this combo is dialed in.
I agree there are alot of variables that are gonna determine how high I should shift. For instance, the fact that I'm still on a stock TB may cause enough of a restriction that shifting at 7K may get me nothing over shifting a 6.5K. No way to find out till I try it though. However, seeing how this is one of Bret's grinds, I'm willing to bet that him and his dad (OldSStroker) have a pretty darn good idea how its gonna act in a 350ci application.

Also, just to clarify, Bret did not spec this cam for me. I bought it from another board member. When I was thinking of buying it, I pm'ed Bret to ask him how it would act in my application and so far what he has told me about it's characteristics has been dead on. If I were to ask Bret to spec a cam for my combo, it might be a little different than this one. Am I right on this, Bret?

Last edited by Colin91Z; Oct 30, 2007 at 09:07 AM.
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 09:16 AM
  #42  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Colin91Z
When I was thinking of buying it, I pm'ed Bret to ask him how it would act in my application and so far what he has told me about it's characteristics has been dead on.
If you're happy, then that's all that matters.
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 09:28 AM
  #43  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 968
From: Wichita, KS
Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
If you're happy, then that's all that matters.
So far, I am It can always be changed if I feel differently about it later

Last edited by Colin91Z; Oct 30, 2007 at 09:32 AM.
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 03:01 PM
  #44  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Originally Posted by Colin91Z
If I were to ask Bret to spec a cam for my combo, it might be a little different than this one. Am I right on this, Bret?
Exactly... I was thinking that you picked this one up second hand and yes if I was doing a custom one just for your car it would be different.

Glad that how I told you it would work was dead on ;-) It's not like I haven't BTDT before!

I have seen that cam in a heads/cam setup run 120+mph in the 1/4 so it has it in it!

Bret
Old Oct 30, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #45  
Colin91Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 968
From: Wichita, KS
Well thats good to know, At least I know it'll get me to my current goal of 120mph+ traps
Thanks for the info Bret

So...do you think you could grind me a cam for this motor that'll take me beyond my current goals if I get bored in the future?

Last edited by Colin91Z; Oct 30, 2007 at 04:14 PM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.