LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related
View Poll Results: What's the better air intake ignoring the Ram-Air effect???
WS6 Intake
54.35%
SS Intake
2.17%
Aftermarket CAI
43.48%
Stock Z/28/Firebird Intake
0
0%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2005, 08:00 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
97FormulaWS-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 2,668
The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

Ok, this has been argued and discussed over and over and over again, it's time to nail it down once and for all.

Now the big part ***NO RAM-AIR DISCUSSION!!!!! This is not meant to argue whether Ram-air has any gains or even exists, this is to discuss which is a better air-intake system and why. Once again, NO RAM-AIR DISCUSSION, this always happens whenever this is brought up and masks the question of what is a better intake

WS6
CAI
SS
97FormulaWS-6 is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:22 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Ultra_Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 511
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

Rephrase your question. It does not invite a reasonable response.
Ultra_Dog is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 12:28 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
ulakovic22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lantana, TX
Posts: 1,872
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

I would say the WS6 intake or anything similar just because of the path the air follows. It is straighter and shorter, it's placement is also very good IMO.
ulakovic22 is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 02:17 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Turbo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 368
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

For what it's worth, the factory WS.6 ram air box becomes a restriction at 450rwhp and up. I picked up 2 mph at the track just by taking the lid off the setup. I'm going to an LS1 induction to see if there is any more gains to be had. If I had to pick one, I'd say the K&N FIPK is probably the best. A good friend of mine had a stock bottom end heads/cam LT1 running the SLP Cold air. Only switching to the K&N FIPK netted him 1.5mph at the track the next week, similar weather. This was on a 116mph car.
Turbo6 is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 04:33 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Johnnynsac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 589
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

No ram air discussion? hmm.

What better way to get air to your engine then a straight shot. Ram air it would be.
Johnnynsac is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 05:06 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
97FormulaWS-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 2,668
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

Ok. then I have to add a "modified" WS6 intake, AKA, De-baffled hood/airbox to this list.

I know on mine, if I remove the airfilter and close the hood, I can see the TB blades through the hood openings.

Otherwise, great comments/votes.
97FormulaWS-6 is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 05:30 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Turbo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 368
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

My little experiment was on a debaffled/modified hood and the airbox had every other louver cut out of it for more open area to the filter.
Turbo6 is offline  
Old 12-18-2005, 09:31 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
97FormulaWS-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 2,668
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

ok, come on guys.... on a "normal" which is better thread there are normally atleast 2-3 pages of discussion.... now what are the opinions on the real question...
97FormulaWS-6 is offline  
Old 12-18-2005, 03:02 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Birdman7389's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,736
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

IMO, WS6 setup is equal to or better than a CAI.
Birdman7389 is offline  
Old 12-18-2005, 03:09 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
bdc95ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: houston, texas
Posts: 1,220
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

if you debaffle it the restriction is in the filter cross-sectional area depending on your hp levels. Next restiction is the maf but that's another disscussion. But overall I think the ws6 sys. is a better design.
-b
bdc95ta is offline  
Old 02-10-2006, 03:35 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
93redbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 307
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

When you say debaffle it.. what do you mean by that. And does anyone ever remove the water stopper in the hood?

Tim
93redbird is offline  
Old 02-10-2006, 04:10 PM
  #12  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,673
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

The baffles in the hood, intended to drop the water out.

WS6:
-remove the hood baffles
-cut the cover to the full face area of the filter
-ditch the MAF
-replace the bellows with the Fernco
-spray a 300-shot in the outlet of the airbox





Injuneer is offline  
Old 02-11-2006, 05:05 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
97WS6NY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 217
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

How do you operate with no maf?
97WS6NY is offline  
Old 02-11-2006, 05:07 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
96m6lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: las vegas
Posts: 1,130
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

he has a speed density set up
96m6lt1 is offline  
Old 02-11-2006, 05:13 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
97WS6NY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 217
Re: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion

sorry to hijack thread for one sec, but, at what point does the maf become a restrcition. I ask because I just bought a fully forged 383 shortblock, some trickflow heads (being ported 2.08/1.625 by LE) and a cam from le/bauer. Lloyd is expecting 450 relatively easily, and maybe more if everything is in line, so, when does it become a restriction to HP? and what do you do to make it flow better?
97WS6NY is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cam's maro
Drag Racing Technique
1
08-11-2015 07:45 AM
surreybrad
LT1 Based Engine Tech
10
08-10-2015 09:34 AM
Bxlt1
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
7
07-18-2015 02:48 PM



Quick Reply: The Final WS6 "Ram-Air" Vs SS "Ram-Air" Vs CAI Discussion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM.