Edelbrock LT1 Air-Gap Intake results!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 30, 2007 | 07:17 AM

#16

joeya

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 15

So......It made a little bit of power, but how was it driving the car after wards?

Apr 30, 2007 | 08:04 AM

#17

BlackbirdWS6

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 616

From: Piscataway, NJ USA

Car feels to build power a bit smoother than before but this is a SOTP feeling which could just be in my head.

-Brian

Apr 30, 2007 | 12:54 PM

#18

Injuneer

Administrator

Joined: Nov 1998

Posts: 71,094

From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by LT4POWR

Sorry, but that's not really meaningful data. Different dynos, different days, cutout opened/closed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heatmaker

Moderator delete this thread! It freaking blows. Cutout open... closed.... 2 different dyno's... this isn't good evidence of a gain. This is just a way for people to get confused... I bet this guy works for edelbrock.

Quote:

Originally Posted by n2ceptor

I see nothing wrong here.... Poster is upfront on his findings... Good for you and thanks for the info..... 5 hp gain is better than no gain at all......

I am sure in the near future, we will get more dyno results....

At least the last poster got it right. Seem others have a severe case of RCDD (reading comprehension deficit disorder).

Thanks for taking the time to post your results, and to carefully state the limitations of your testing. Everyone should be so accurate.

Apr 30, 2007 | 12:58 PM

#19

bombebomb

Registered User

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 1,855

From: Ohio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heatmaker

Someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed? Atlest hes trying dude.

Apr 30, 2007 | 03:49 PM

#20

TQdrivenws6

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 1,454

From: MN/WI

On a side note, what muffler do you have that was costing you 20hp

Apr 30, 2007 | 04:13 PM

#21

Camarocracy

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2003

Posts: 992

From: Youngstown, Ohio

A nice gain in torque.

Apr 30, 2007 | 04:30 PM

#22

Heatmaker

Advanced Member

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 3,874

From: Under The Hood

damn you guys are harsh on me.... i said i was sorry....

Apr 30, 2007 | 07:46 PM

#23

BlackbirdWS6

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 616

From: Piscataway, NJ USA

I'm running a dynomax ultra-flo muffler which I'm surprised is costing me as much power as it is. I chose it because it offers me a relatively quiet cruise and gets nasty when the rpms go up. I'm not getting it lol. I wanted to do more runs since the hp seemed to continue to increase.

-brian

Apr 30, 2007 | 08:36 PM

#24

Quickz1670

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 79

From: San Diego, Ca

So it breathes better in higher rpm than the stocker ? How's the heat soak?

Apr 30, 2007 | 08:49 PM

#25

CANTONRACER

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2000

Posts: 1,764

From: North Canton, OH

Moderator...delete this post so everyone can go back to bsing about the intake.

Personally, I like seeing a different post instead the normal, over and over questions that are asked....

Apr 30, 2007 | 11:07 PM

#26

BlackbirdWS6

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 616

From: Piscataway, NJ USA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quickz1670

So it breathes better in higher rpm than the stocker ? How's the heat soak?

well it seems to be that way with the little extra power at a little bit of a higher rpm. Heat soak does not seem to be an issue since the results continued to increase with every run.

Just to note, the dyno was very consistent and other cars were putting down nearly identical numbers with each run.

-brian