LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

DYNOED the TA today, a freak bolt on LT1 !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 25, 2004 | 10:45 PM
  #31  
J's 82's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 316
From: Idaho Falls, Idaho
Numbers are nice and normal, which is a good thing..

my cars powerplant is similar but has shorties and an electric water pump, it put down 289 hp and 329 tq..

good luck with your next mods
Old May 25, 2004 | 11:31 PM
  #32  
Xride's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,622
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
hmm I put down 270 and 305 on a dyno jet...... stock.
Old May 25, 2004 | 11:36 PM
  #33  
TexasTechTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 553
From: LUBBOCK Tx and Dallas on occasions
I would like to add to my car could use a little tuning still and could gaina few more horses.

Also I know from experience that soem dynos are high and some are low this one is average from what I have seen
Old May 26, 2004 | 01:30 AM
  #34  
slimdawson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,234
From: New Bern, NC USA
Originally posted by Cahill93Z
wow you gained 5 mph with just RR's? People with bolt-on's and hot cam arn't touching 112 mph traps....correct me if i'm wrong
I guess I should have said consistently running 111. It happened to be 112 on that pass. I usually only run 85 through the 1/8, so it picks up hard after that. But, I did mention all the parts I have. I still use the stock MAF and TB.

I do see a lot of cammed LT1s not running that mph so I don't know what is up with that.
Old May 26, 2004 | 02:02 AM
  #35  
96SilverRam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 780
From: Tejas
If you want over 300rwhp it will take almost every bolt-on to get to the 300 + crowd with a stock internal motor.



I think I have done almost everything you can bolt-on to one of these motors and I dyno'ed
323 rwhp & 343 rwtq. (These numbers do not include PCM tune or the cut-out on the car) I willing to bet that with the other two things the car dyno's 330 rwhp & 350 rwtq.


Good average #'s for your LT1 and yes the torque looks better than normal...
Old May 26, 2004 | 03:06 AM
  #36  
Haskin Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 322
From: Bonita Springs, Florida, USA
wow 96silver ram...now that is a freak..although i would say my cars somewhat of a freak itself, with mods in sig through an auto in 97 degree heat it made 291/324...wonder what she'll do after 1.6 RRs and an electric H20 pump?
Old May 26, 2004 | 12:04 PM
  #37  
96SilverRam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 780
From: Tejas
Thanks for the comp's
Old May 26, 2004 | 12:05 PM
  #38  
TexasTechTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 553
From: LUBBOCK Tx and Dallas on occasions
yea what were your mods?
Old May 26, 2004 | 12:09 PM
  #39  
96SilverRam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 780
From: Tejas
Old May 26, 2004 | 12:58 PM
  #40  
"White Knight"'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,544
From: Michigan
I'd be happy with those numbers.........best i can pull 14.0
s right now with mods in sig. I need a new opti i think
Old May 26, 2004 | 01:29 PM
  #41  
GREGG 97Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,997
From: Reading, PA
Originally posted by Cahill93Z
wow you gained 5 mph with just RR's? People with bolt-on's and hot cam arn't touching 112 mph traps....correct me if i'm wrong
Wrong

Old May 26, 2004 | 01:31 PM
  #42  
Cahill93Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 98
Originally posted by "White Knight"
I'd be happy with those numbers.........best i can pull 14.0
s right now with mods in sig. I need a new opti i think
i stand corected
Old May 26, 2004 | 03:11 PM
  #43  
baron4406's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 244
From: Allentown,Pa.
Originally posted by GREGG 97Z
Wrong

He,he..............I'm a witness to Gregg's claims too. His car flies!!

BTW see ya friday Gregg
Old May 26, 2004 | 03:15 PM
  #44  
Xride's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,622
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Originally posted by "White Knight"
I'd be happy with those numbers.........best i can pull 14.0
s right now with mods in sig. I need a new opti i think
thats not very good, you must have some problems.

I run almost that stock and at 3000'
Old May 26, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #45  
drewstealth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,623
From: Fairfield, ca
Yeah i would say your #'s are good but not freak #'s. I put out 281rwph and 308rwtq with just a CAI, Catback, and a LT4km. But with all the mods now i only put out 283rwhp and 319rwtq. But if you look at my a/f ratio you can pretty much understand why. Hopefully with my tune it will all be squared away. Even though i haven't completely gotten rid of my exhaust leak.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM.