you should check to see if it also has pulleys Maybe a TB bypass too? Nice numbers, but i'm not shocked either.

 

nah don't think it does but not sure

 

This car will see low 12s soon. I drove it at the track last Saturday and ran a 12.6? with a spinning 1.8? 60' . Car had a slight miss to it. Since then he has changed the plugs. This car is running stock suspension. With the LCAs he is installing this week and a good set of MT/ET streets,this car will run the numbers.

 

I hope he does, that way he can represent the LT1 crowd. Lets get moving here, I am waiting for results, not talk.

 

Working on it.

It was at the track this past weekend...12.603@ 108.91 with a 1.800 60'. Track prep was terrible...no traction through 1st at all. Took care of all of my tune-up stuff last night...my plugs were fouled from dyno day the previous weekend. I'm waiting on some replacement bushings from Metco for my control arms, then we'll take it back up to the track and see how things go.

I'll post results as soon as I can...possibly this weekend, more likely the next since I have a lot of stuff going on Saturday.

 

mph seems a bit low but still nice #'s greg's 2000 ss ran 109 in the 1/4 stock and he only ran a 13.2 on street tires spinning off theline.

 

Zac's numbers are STD. I'd say take away roughly 10 hp for SAE, which puts it right about where it should be with a catback and cold air intake. I did 260 rwhp completely stock, and 300 with LTs and a CAI. If I change my numbers to STD, I did 267 stock and 311 with headers. Still mighty good numbers for relatively low mods.

 

Whats the difference of SAE and STD, and whats the forumula to convert?

I always thought SAE was corrected, STD was what it actually pulled

 

http://www.yzf-r1forum.com/dyno.html

Looks like they're just two different ways of correcting numbers...they recalculate the results using different temperatures and pressures. It says that STD numbers are ~4% higher than SAE numbers.