LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Dyno Results, OMG!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2012, 11:41 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

It is getting richer at the top based on what you are reporting so it looks like just bad tuning at this point. You have grossly oversized injectors and what should be a good choice for a fuel pump.

Wouldn't hurt to be prepared to monitor fuel pressure on the dyno but I really don't think it is a problem.

The MAF is stock right? As in you haven't screwed it up with a grinder or anything. That sort of thing makes mailorder tuning a nightmare.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 11:53 AM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ascastil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 269
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

MAF is stock. I was under the impression that the 42# injectors would be taken into consideration in the tune?
ascastil is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 12:07 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

Yes they should be tuned for but they are still much larger than necessary. 30lbs would have worked, 36lbs would have been fine even by the standards of those who are overly conservative and suggest keeping the DC low.

It is tuneable, you have them so run them but you should not have bought injectors so big.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 01:18 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
ACE1252's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Kernersville, NC
Posts: 2,062
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

What are the specs on your exhaust? If headers, Jet Hot coated or not?

What brand of injectors did you buy? Are they new or used?

How old are your O2 sensors?

As many have mentioned, need to data log it and see what is going on.

Last edited by ACE1252; 08-07-2012 at 01:21 PM.
ACE1252 is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:11 PM
  #20  
Guest
 
Guest47904's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

I would fire it up and check the fuel pressure at idle. Your Walbro pump is not on my favorite list. If it' appears to be ok, pull the vac line and plug it to see if the pressure then rises.

If you go back to the dyno, try to keep the fuel ratio at or below 14:1 by restricting the fuel return line. If you keep consistently higher fuel pressure and have the same lean results, you may want to double check with the programmer what numbers he used.
Guest47904 is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:19 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

Far as the intank fuel pumps for performance application that easily fit the LT1 tank it is chinese junk or Walbro. Far as I know all the replacement 255lph pumps we have for these are one of those no matter what box they came in.

A lot of us have had good results with Walbro from Racetronix.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:48 PM
  #22  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ascastil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 269
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

Pump and injectors are both from racetronix. Injectors are flow matched. True dual 2.5 inch exhaust, no cats, o2 delete. Pacesetter long tubes, no jet hot.

Last edited by ascastil; 08-07-2012 at 02:51 PM.
ascastil is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:27 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

uncoated headers could easily cause melted wires and such.
By O2 delete you mean just the rear right?

Some guys will say the 2.5" duals are a problem and maybe it isn't ideal but it isn't that big a restriction unless the setup is rather aggressive and the LSA really tight like below 108
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 07:01 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
ACE1252's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Kernersville, NC
Posts: 2,062
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

I was mainly looking to see if maybe his O2's were contaminated by the Jet hot coating. They have been known to kill O2 sensors.

At what point in the exhaust was the AFR bung welded?
How old are the O2 sensors and what brand are they?

Last edited by ACE1252; 08-07-2012 at 07:04 PM.
ACE1252 is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 08:33 PM
  #25  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ascastil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 269
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

I think the bung was put near the x. The o2s I believe were put in when I first rebuilt the bottom end, approx. 15k miles ago. Again, I can't be positive, its been a few years. The car isn't driving much, lol. I'm unsure of the brand. Just the rear o2s were deleted.

Last edited by ascastil; 08-07-2012 at 08:37 PM.
ascastil is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 09:00 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

I guess it should be said Bosch narrowband sensors do NOT play well with the LT1, someone posted a technical explanation within the last few months but it has been well documented for a lot of years.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 11:06 PM
  #27  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ascastil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 269
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

Possible bad news, but making progress. Checked fuel pressure tonight and looks like this:
KOEO-41psi, SLOWLY, and it holds it with the key off.
Idle-41psi.
FPR vacuum line removed-46psi.
It doesnt climb to 41 psi when I first turn the key, it takes 15-20 seconds. I was gonna do the test back to back to verify readings, and it read 35psi, and took forever to get to 40. But when I turn the key off it holds the pressure everytime. Also, when I first turn the key and it sounds like its priming, the pressure rises quick, drops off, and makes its way back up.
ascastil is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 11:14 PM
  #28  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,696
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

When you turn the key to "run" the fuel pump should prime for 2 seconds and shut down. At that time it should have reached 40psi. Are you saying yours continues to run for more than 2 seconds, and that the pressure rises slowly, drops and then rises again?

When is the last time the fuel filter was changed?
Injuneer is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 11:15 PM
  #29  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ascastil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 269
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

Just did the test with the key on again, and this time it rose to 41 pretty quick, and when I turned the key off it holds pressure. Im just worried about the other few times when it didnt rise as quick. Sound normal or no?
ascastil is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 11:17 PM
  #30  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ascastil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 269
Re: Dyno Results, OMG!

The fuel filter hasnt been changed recently, but there isnt a lot of miles on it.
It primes for a few seconds up to about 44psi. After its done priming it drops down to 36, and is now quickly reaching and holding 41.

Last edited by ascastil; 08-07-2012 at 11:23 PM.
ascastil is offline  


Quick Reply: Dyno Results, OMG!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.