LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Dyno Results - Heads and GM 847cam

Old Mar 30, 2003 | 09:23 AM
  #31  
sleeperZ96BT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 903
From: boxboro, MA, USA
Originally posted by Lightning-Killer
how big are the gas tanks on f-bodys? 15 gallons?
yeah, bout that, maybe 15.5 gallons max for the LT1. i know my buddys 01 WS6 had like a 17 or 18 gallon tank. not sure when they made it bigger. you guys getting 180 to a tank, where are you filling up and what kind of driving are you doing? city/highway split? high revving? driving like a granny? i just cant sacrifice that many miles per tank.........
Brian
Old Mar 30, 2003 | 09:47 AM
  #32  
Grease's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 870
From: Cuyahoga Falls, OHIO
I don't go driving around at WOT but I don't drive like a granny either. I do both city and highway driving. Plus I keep the revs over 2000 rpm when driving, the cam is too soft under 1500rpm. Even with 4.11s I only use 6th gear on the highway.

But hey, if I was worried about gas milage, I would have bought a Honda Civic
Old Mar 30, 2003 | 10:31 AM
  #33  
RealQuick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,645
From: Bridgewater, MA
nice #'s.
Old Mar 30, 2003 | 11:16 AM
  #34  
Schurters LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,942
From: kitchener/Ontario
Sweat #'s now i now i picked the right cam i have the same set up as you but Phil is doing a full port . i have a ? why run a cooled plug? and what plug should i go with ? tr6?
thx
Old Mar 30, 2003 | 02:05 PM
  #35  
Grease's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 870
From: Cuyahoga Falls, OHIO
Originally posted by Schurters LT1
Sweat #'s now i now i picked the right cam i have the same set up as you but Phil is doing a full port . i have a ? why run a cooled plug? and what plug should i go with ? tr6?
thx
I'm no expert on what plug to use but I've been doing a little research and found out a few things.
  • Colder plugs are better for high compression engines, not just nitrous and supercharger applications. My heads were milled quite a bit before I bought them plus I'm using a thinner head gasket.
  • You want to run the next colder plug for every 75-100hp you make over stock.
  • Run the coldest plug you can get away with without fouling.

I'll switch to NGK TR6s and go from there.
Old Mar 30, 2003 | 06:03 PM
  #36  
OneFlyn95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,431
From: Pacific North West
well i got 150 on about half a tank today so it is not to bad. Mixed driving leaning towards steady 40MPH driving. a few burn outs and WOT runs to 120MPH.

BTW I run TR6 plugs. seams to work well at 11.0:1
Old Mar 30, 2003 | 06:26 PM
  #37  
sleeperZ96BT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 903
From: boxboro, MA, USA
Originally posted by OneFlyn95z28
well i got 150 on about half a tank today so it is not to bad. Mixed driving leaning towards steady 40MPH driving. a few burn outs and WOT runs to 120MPH.

BTW I run TR6 plugs. seams to work well at 11.0:1
1/2 a tank on the guage or at the pump? damn GM gas gauge on my car at 1/2 a tank actually means im 2/3 of the way down, and it fills up way past full..........quite annoying.
brian
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 02:38 PM
  #38  
LT4POWR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 586
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Congrats, great #s!!!
Old Apr 12, 2003 | 11:40 PM
  #39  
Dr.Mudge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,148
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally posted by Lightning-Killer
what kinda mpg with that cam? cant be good.
Whats good exactly? I got 17-19MPG average with my setup, since it was mostly semi-stop and go I never saw in the 20s.
Old Apr 12, 2003 | 11:51 PM
  #40  
Lightning-Killer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 90
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Originally posted by Dr.Mudge
Whats good exactly? I got 17-19MPG average with my setup, since it was mostly semi-stop and go I never saw in the 20s.
thats good. i drive a truck that gets 12/13mpg and thats good for a truck.

Brandon
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 07:00 AM
  #41  
CANTONRACER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,764
From: North Canton, OH
That is not very good for a newer truck. Take my old 89 GMC longbed with a 166K 305 which still gets 15-16 mpg. When I bought it with 113K, I was getting 20-21 mpg.

Now it also has no acceleration either, so I guess there is a trade off.
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 10:33 AM
  #42  
DarkHorse's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,433
From: Akron, Ohio
But J, your truck makes a nice psuedo-racer
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 11:00 AM
  #43  
CANTONRACER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,764
From: North Canton, OH
I will let ya know that many Civic and Cavalier have faced the wrath of my truck.....
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 09:22 PM
  #44  
96blackbeast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 136
From: Baton Rouge, La
Grease-

What was your race wieght?
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 09:42 PM
  #45  
Grease's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 870
From: Cuyahoga Falls, OHIO
Originally posted by 96blackbeast
Grease-

What was your race wieght?
Last time I weighed it, it was 3430lbs with a ¼ tank of gas. That was without me. Since then I've removed my rear bumper support but added a pair of BMR boxed subframe connectors. So I guess I'm still about the same weight as before.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM.