Dyno numbers sucked butt....
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,362
Originally posted by cndctrdj
so pasky when are you gonna get it fixed and dynoed again... im all excited i need to get an idea of what my car is gonna do when i get my hedaers and a few other things on
so pasky when are you gonna get it fixed and dynoed again... im all excited i need to get an idea of what my car is gonna do when i get my hedaers and a few other things on
. The bodyshop im going to is going to paint it black, put new carpet I already have, and my two nice leather racing bucket seats. So i'll see what happens, I have a feeling i'll definatley get 280+ this time. She did me proud last night with that z28 . Thanks guys.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 643
From: Chicago
i dynoed 256hp/295torque with just SLP CAI and catback......since then i have put a 160 in with dual fan switches...mac mid headers and 2.5" high flow y pipe and a tranny cooler..all the free mods (TB bypass/descreened MAF etc..) and turned up the pressure a little in the 60E..i think i'll be around 300 now..what do u guys think?
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Originally posted by 94zLT1
i dynoed 256hp/295torque with just SLP CAI and catback......since then i have put a 160 in with dual fan switches...mac mid headers and 2.5" high flow y pipe and a tranny cooler..all the free mods (TB bypass/descreened MAF etc..) and turned up the pressure a little in the 60E..i think i'll be around 300 now..what do u guys think?
i dynoed 256hp/295torque with just SLP CAI and catback......since then i have put a 160 in with dual fan switches...mac mid headers and 2.5" high flow y pipe and a tranny cooler..all the free mods (TB bypass/descreened MAF etc..) and turned up the pressure a little in the 60E..i think i'll be around 300 now..what do u guys think?
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 39
Originally posted by Patman
I just dynoed this weekend and pulled 254rwhp with just an SLP 2OTL catback and the stock tuning, and my car is auto. After Vince McCauley did the tuning, he got it to 265rwhp (and bumped up my torque by 30ft lbs in the midrange!!).
I totally did not expect it to be as strong as it was stock, I figured it would've been 240, even with the catback. Although it had an air leak at the intake elbow which caused it to run lean (14:1) so that's why my car has always run such strong quarter mile times for stock. It's going to run even stronger now though!
I just dynoed this weekend and pulled 254rwhp with just an SLP 2OTL catback and the stock tuning, and my car is auto. After Vince McCauley did the tuning, he got it to 265rwhp (and bumped up my torque by 30ft lbs in the midrange!!).
I totally did not expect it to be as strong as it was stock, I figured it would've been 240, even with the catback. Although it had an air leak at the intake elbow which caused it to run lean (14:1) so that's why my car has always run such strong quarter mile times for stock. It's going to run even stronger now though!
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Originally posted by 94zLT1
i dynoed 256hp/295torque with just SLP CAI and catback......since then i have put a 160 in with dual fan switches...mac mid headers and 2.5" high flow y pipe and a tranny cooler..all the free mods (TB bypass/descreened MAF etc..) and turned up the pressure a little in the 60E..i think i'll be around 300 now..what do u guys think?
i dynoed 256hp/295torque with just SLP CAI and catback......since then i have put a 160 in with dual fan switches...mac mid headers and 2.5" high flow y pipe and a tranny cooler..all the free mods (TB bypass/descreened MAF etc..) and turned up the pressure a little in the 60E..i think i'll be around 300 now..what do u guys think?
Looks like we have very similar setups, but I'm a M6. If I were you, I wouldn't look to make much more rwhp than what's in my sig, especially considering you are an A4. BTW, I also have the TB Bypass and Descreened MAF.
Dan
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Originally posted by DarkZ711
14:1 is rich, not lean
14:1 is rich, not lean
Most guys try to stay around 13:1
Remember, it's the AIR:FUEL ratio.
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; May 17, 2004 at 08:29 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 174
From: ATX
i thought the Stoicheometric Air: Fuel ratio was 14.7:1? If he's running 14:1, less air per fuel, so it's rich right? I could be wrong tho. I'm only a newbie. Anyway, I hope ya get everything straightened up Pasky. Can't wait to see that thing, if we can ever get a Texas area thirdgen meet!
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Originally posted by tamatt27
i thought the Stoicheometric Air: Fuel ratio was 14.7:1? If he's running 14:1, less air per fuel, so it's rich right? I could be wrong tho. I'm only a newbie. Anyway, I hope ya get everything straightened up Pasky. Can't wait to see that thing, if we can ever get a Texas area thirdgen meet!
i thought the Stoicheometric Air: Fuel ratio was 14.7:1? If he's running 14:1, less air per fuel, so it's rich right? I could be wrong tho. I'm only a newbie. Anyway, I hope ya get everything straightened up Pasky. Can't wait to see that thing, if we can ever get a Texas area thirdgen meet!
I think the stoicheometric a/f is only used at idle and partial throttle.
Dan
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Originally posted by a mean 94z
I thought 14.1:1 was rich too?
I thought 14.1:1 was rich too?
Man..... Its lean! 14.7 is perfect A/F ratio for BURNING not power, you won't make any power at 14.7:1 A/F & you will prolly lean out & blow something up, good A/F at WOT is around 12.5-13.1 depending on mods & cam etc.... That also varies, try keeping her richer in the peak TQ band & lean out at top end, no more then 13.1 though, well sometimes you might make more power going leaner but thats ussually not the case or just not worth it.
