Differences between Comp 306 and extreme 230/236?
Originally posted by Kreinmc
Think what you want. I have had the 306 with stock heads as my daily driver. 13.0@112.4. and i have shorties. A buddy of mine has the 230/236 on stock heads and runs 13.3@107 with longtubes. I really haven't seen any good numbers from XE cams besides dyno #'s. Even the 305 seems to be a better cam. jmho though
Think what you want. I have had the 306 with stock heads as my daily driver. 13.0@112.4. and i have shorties. A buddy of mine has the 230/236 on stock heads and runs 13.3@107 with longtubes. I really haven't seen any good numbers from XE cams besides dyno #'s. Even the 305 seems to be a better cam. jmho though
I talked to brent at TEA thursday about this actually. I am doing a build up with their heads and 230/236 cam. He said that the 306 looses alot of low-midrange power because of the wide lobe seperation. he says its more of a nitrous cam, and the nitrous makes up for the lack of low end. With that said I/we deceided to go with the 230/236 cam. With a few bolt ons, he said 11's shouldn't be a problem. He does this for a living so I am inclinded to take his opinion seriously. Hope this helps some.
Originally posted by xxsaint69x
rofl, i love when all you people claim that CC306 doesnt have low end power or that XE's are some much more supperior to CC306.
rofl, i love when all you people claim that CC306 doesnt have low end power or that XE's are some much more supperior to CC306.
Originally posted by xxsaint69x
rofl, i love when all you people claim that CC306 doesnt have low end power or that XE's are some much more supperior to CC306.
rofl, i love when all you people claim that CC306 doesnt have low end power or that XE's are some much more supperior to CC306.
Originally posted by Shawn 97 Z28 M6
heh.. Too bad I've had *both* in my car.. W/ the same setup ~ AND actually have experienced the difference of the two first hand
heh.. Too bad I've had *both* in my car.. W/ the same setup ~ AND actually have experienced the difference of the two first hand
Originally posted by Shawn 97 Z28 M6
I've had both the CC306 and now my current 230/236 - but on a 110lsa. The 306 made a lot less torque than the EX down low ~ and across the rest of the powerband, but both peak numbers are about the same. But the CC306 did hold it's peak power a couple hundred RPM higher and I've actually run a better ET at the track w/ the 306 than I have yet w/ the EX cam. Comparably, the 306 got me a 12.02@115mph, while the EX was a 12.14@114mph. Although now I have a rollbar and and few other items adding a little weight to the car.
But now I get to hit the track sometime this winter to go for a new best.
I've had both the CC306 and now my current 230/236 - but on a 110lsa. The 306 made a lot less torque than the EX down low ~ and across the rest of the powerband, but both peak numbers are about the same. But the CC306 did hold it's peak power a couple hundred RPM higher and I've actually run a better ET at the track w/ the 306 than I have yet w/ the EX cam. Comparably, the 306 got me a 12.02@115mph, while the EX was a 12.14@114mph. Although now I have a rollbar and and few other items adding a little weight to the car.
But now I get to hit the track sometime this winter to go for a new best.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jan 23, 2015 01:13 PM



more lift then the 230/236 cam with a little less duration .. avalable on 112 and 111 LSA
. I opted for the .598/.608 lift grind cam.
