LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Datalogs for LT1 looks odd on left bank. Can someone look.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 11:11 AM
  #1  
RACEON's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 292
Datalogs for LT1 looks odd on left bank. Can someone look.

I did some very long runs to try and see if VEMaster can make driveability a little better. But after looking at the logs I see a trend of my heated O2's left bank looking kinda lean. Exhaust/valvetrain any common problems that may cause a false lean? I have DRM long tubes, Corvette 1993, DELTEQ ignition and Earl Pressure header gaskets.
http://www.mediafire.com/?9wwcxxwmzin
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #2  
RACEON's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 292
Can O2 sensors cause this? I went from non heated to heated O2's and a DELTEQ igintion system. Didnt run like this before those items, and Wideband shows 14.2-14.5 at cruise and 13.1-12.7 at WOT. Wideband is in right pipe behind header collector.
I just looked at the plugs, all were a very light tan, with no indication of pre ignition, based on many years of looking at plugs and pretty pics on the net to help.
All the header gaskets are clean, as no evidence of exhaust leaks, no burn marks etc and headers are coated and I see no leaks that are evident.
The left O2 sensor, AC Delcos, was a tad, about a mm loose. I dont know if that is enough to cause a leak, but it was there.
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #3  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,114
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
I downloaded your files, but they wouldn't open up correctly with my copy of DataMaster. The data was not appearing in the correct locations.... e.g. "cell 159". Like it was indexed incorrectly or meant to be opened with some other version of the software. Can you do an "export as .csv"?
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 05:30 PM
  #4  
RACEON's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 292
Originally Posted by Injuneer
I downloaded your files, but they wouldn't open up correctly with my copy of DataMaster. The data was not appearing in the correct locations.... e.g. "cell 159". Like it was indexed incorrectly or meant to be opened with some other version of the software. Can you do an "export as .csv"?
I will try to export it to .csv Is that an excel program?
http://www.mediafire.com/?darnencxxja

Last edited by RACEON; Oct 2, 2007 at 05:38 PM.
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 08:56 PM
  #5  
RACEON's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 292
See if this works
http://www.mediafire.com/?35gzczdy222

Last edited by RACEON; Oct 2, 2007 at 09:39 PM.
Old Oct 3, 2007 | 12:18 PM
  #6  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,114
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
I opened the first one and it opened fine in Excel (.csv is comma separated variable, and can be opened by a number of programs).

Biggest problem I see is that the file is huge... Appears the log (FSStart) is over 50 minutes long, with 26,200 lines of data. Don't need to do that, unless you are simply going to log continuously until some sort of an intermittent problem happens, and you can somehow identify the lines of data where it happened.

Also, the .csv file does not normally include the DTC codes, and the corrupt file that I opened with TTS DataMaster showed several existing codes. Do you see any DTC codes when you open it with your copy?

I'll try and take a look at these. My time is limited and I have a few people who have been waiting for weeks for some feedback, but I'll try and squeeze it in.
Old Oct 3, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #7  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,114
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Left side is running very rich.... long term in Cell 16 (idle) is bottomed out at 108 on both sides, and the short term is down to 77 and still pulling out fuel. Right side isn't much better at idle.

At idle, MAP is ~58. How big is the cam?

If you don't understand why a long term fuel correction of 108 indicates the enigne would be running excessively rich without the corrections, read this:

http://members.aol.com/InjuneerZZ/ScanMast.htm

I'll continue to look at them.
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #8  
RACEON's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 292
Originally Posted by Injuneer
I opened the first one and it opened fine in Excel (.csv is comma separated variable, and can be opened by a number of programs).

Biggest problem I see is that the file is huge... Appears the log (FSStart) is over 50 minutes long, with 26,200 lines of data. Don't need to do that, unless you are simply going to log continuously until some sort of an intermittent problem happens, and you can somehow identify the lines of data where it happened.

Also, the .csv file does not normally include the DTC codes, and the corrupt file that I opened with TTS DataMaster showed several existing codes. Do you see any DTC codes when you open it with your copy?

I'll try and take a look at these. My time is limited and I have a few people who have been waiting for weeks for some feedback, but I'll try and squeeze it in.
I really appreciate you looking at the data. I have shorter ones I can load up. I was doing long files to see trends.
When I scan her their are no codes, and Datamaster doesnt say there are any.
Here are two much shorter files.
http://www.mediafire.com/?d19en9oisyi

Last edited by RACEON; Oct 4, 2007 at 10:40 PM.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 12:03 AM
  #9  
RACEON's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 292
Originally Posted by Injuneer
Left side is running very rich.... long term in Cell 16 (idle) is bottomed out at 108 on both sides, and the short term is down to 77 and still pulling out fuel. Right side isn't much better at idle.

At idle, MAP is ~58. How big is the cam?

If you don't understand why a long term fuel correction of 108 indicates the enigne would be running excessively rich without the corrections, read this:

http://members.aol.com/InjuneerZZ/ScanMast.htm

I'll continue to look at them.
My cam is 230/236 in/ex 112 LS, 544 in 555 ex in a 396 with 11.1 comp,
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 05:24 AM
  #10  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,114
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Probably be a lot better if you listed all the mods in the first post. Makes it a lot easier to evaluate the data.

Never understand whyh EVERYONE doesn't use the "signature" field. Sometimes getting the basic data is like pulling teeth.
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 02:53 AM
  #11  
RACEON's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 292
Mods in signature now.
Some forums have the signature to where you have to select it as it wont default to show it anymore, so I dont update allot of forums I go to. Sorry.
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #12  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,114
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Start by tracking down why its got 108 BLM's at idle. Who did the tune? Were they aware of the correct injector size and the actual fuel pressure you are running? Have you verified the size of your injectors? Have you tested your fuel pressure? For some reason its running pig rich at idle, and the PCM is pulling out fuel like crazy. On nthe left side, its reached the limit of how much fuel it can pull out (15%) and its using the short terms to pull out another huge amount.... in effect, looking at 108 BLM's and INT's in the 70's means the PCM is pulling out 50% of the fuel it thought the engine needed.

I assume the 93 Corvette engine is like the F-Body, and runs speed-density? You have to look at the MAP and IAT to make sure its calculating the density right. High MAP results from the cam overlap, so the VE should have been adjusted to compensate.
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 10:13 PM
  #13  
RACEON's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 292
Originally Posted by Injuneer
Start by tracking down why its got 108 BLM's at idle. Who did the tune? Were they aware of the correct injector size and the actual fuel pressure you are running? Have you verified the size of your injectors? Have you tested your fuel pressure? For some reason its running pig rich at idle, and the PCM is pulling out fuel like crazy. On nthe left side, its reached the limit of how much fuel it can pull out (15%) and its using the short terms to pull out another huge amount.... in effect, looking at 108 BLM's and INT's in the 70's means the PCM is pulling out 50% of the fuel it thought the engine needed.

I assume the 93 Corvette engine is like the F-Body, and runs speed-density? You have to look at the MAP and IAT to make sure its calculating the density right. High MAP results from the cam overlap, so the VE should have been adjusted to compensate.
I wont say who did the tune, but in all fairness when it was originally done the IAC was bad and I had about 90% WOT as the throttle body wasn't correct, so this may have had a little bit to do with the idle etc.
My fuel pressure is 43.5 and the injectors are Ford SVO 30#, flowed to within 1%. The constant is for 30#, set at around 31.7 I believe.
I will look at the MAP and IAT to verify it is correct. I may swap out to another set and see what she does. It is Speed Density, and the tuner is well versed in Speed Density.

Last edited by RACEON; Oct 13, 2007 at 01:31 AM.
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 04:31 PM
  #14  
JSK333's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,009
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Considering your cam, your idle kpa is fine. Check for leaks around your O2 sensors. If none, then it's very likely the VE tables since you're running SD.

I had to lower the stock tune by a good 20-25 points in the idle/cruising cells for my 236/242/114 cam, to get BLMs back to ~128 (my idle kpa is about 60).

Edit: One more thing... you'll need to tweak your individual cylinder fuel trim tables to fix splits too, especially off-idle. I had to do that with my cam, and now it's running within a few BLM points of each other, both at and off idle.

Last edited by JSK333; Oct 15, 2007 at 04:37 PM.
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 05:53 PM
  #15  
RACEON's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 292
Originally Posted by JSK333
Considering your cam, your idle kpa is fine. Check for leaks around your O2 sensors. If none, then it's very likely the VE tables since you're running SD.

I had to lower the stock tune by a good 20-25 points in the idle/cruising cells for my 236/242/114 cam, to get BLMs back to ~128 (my idle kpa is about 60).
I just put 2 new sensors in, and they came with sensor safe anti seize grease for the threads. The other sensors I had had nothing. Also, the collector is getting a accuseal clamp as it was pulled towards the cat back exhaust when the exhaust bracket on transmission was put in backwards it pulled it about an inch. It is right behind the O2 sensor. I put smoke and even light in there at night and no smoke or light came out or was visible.
Its a Corvette so the exhaust hanger is different than the F body.
I ran three very different tunes, and the left side does this no matter what. I may try a stock tune to really see what she does for the fun of it.
Also, the 93 is Batch fire so I have no capability to select each cylinder to fine tune. I dont even have a left right bank tuning feature. I may email TC and see if this is possible with Speed Density batch fire.
Thanks Steve
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jan 27, 2015 06:27 AM
jayblev95
LT1 Based Engine Tech
18
Jan 20, 2015 01:30 PM
CaRParts102
Parts For Sale
0
Dec 6, 2014 08:45 AM
dmaastr
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
Jul 1, 2002 02:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 PM.