LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Computer chip vs. programmer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2013, 10:14 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
vicki711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 78
Computer chip vs. programmer

I just had my motor rebuilt. I have a stock LT1 with the GM hotcam kit and a set of headers and now I have a bit of a misfire issue at warm up. Would it better to get, replacing the current computer chip or the programmer?
vicki711 is offline  
Old 01-26-2013, 10:52 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
shoebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 27,709
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

If you have a 95, your only option is programming. 93 was the last year replaceable chips were used.
shoebox is offline  
Old 01-26-2013, 11:22 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
vicki711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 78
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

i have one other problem i have been fighting as well. i didnt go to overboard with the engine mods. i put the gm hot cam kit and a set of pacesetter headers.i also replaced the optispark plugs and wires.since i got the car back i have been dealing with a misfire chug problem only after it warms up .. it chugs bad enough even in 6th gear coastin down hill it bucks.. what would the chances be of my problem being that i havent done any reprogram on the car. what confuses me is i have no check engine lite coming on.
vicki711 is offline  
Old 01-26-2013, 11:51 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Woodstown, NJ
Posts: 4,154
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

A slight misfire is usually plugs/wires related so I would start there. Check for any burning or misconnected wires, then double-check.

You do need programming for the engine to run properly. Not all situations with a cam swap will set the SES light immediately. There also also some codes that will set that do NOT light the SES. Just because the dash light is not on doesn't mean there aren't codes present.
RamAir95TA is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 04:54 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
bw_hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kissimmee, Fl, USA
Posts: 1,942
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

That bucking in top gear at low engine peers, assuming plugs and wires are good, is likely from the lack of a good tune.....
bw_hunter is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 06:01 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
vicki711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 78
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

It has brand new plug wires and plugs, new optispark, fuel filter, etc. I just didn't know if I needed to program the chip to compensate for the new cam..if that's why I'm having this problem? It didn't do any of this before the new rebuild.
vicki711 is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 06:33 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
bw_hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kissimmee, Fl, USA
Posts: 1,942
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

Originally Posted by vicki711
It has brand new plug wires and plugs, new optispark, fuel filter, etc. I just didn't know if I needed to program the chip to compensate for the new cam..if that's why I'm having this problem? It didn't do any of this before the new rebuild.
You need a tune....
bw_hunter is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 06:40 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
vicki711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 78
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

I have tuned it, it has brand new plugs, wires and optispark. Would tuning the chip with a programmer take care of the rest of the tuning problem? Or, what is there left to tune? I've scanned it, there are no codes and no check engine light.
vicki711 is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 06:56 PM
  #9  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,677
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

How did you tune it for the cam - as in adjusting the tune in the PCM - not a "tune up" (plugs, wires, cap/rotor)? Did you do it yourself, have it mail-order turned or dyno tuned?

The only "programmer" available is the Hypertech Power Programmer, and that can't tune for a cam, and it's not even useful for anything other than gear ratio changes, fan on/off temps, removing speed limiter and rev limiter, etc. Their "power program" has been demonstrated to lose HP.
Injuneer is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 06:59 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
vicki711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 78
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

I have not tuned it at all..the cam that is. Could that be what is causing the issues?
vicki711 is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 07:37 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
bw_hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kissimmee, Fl, USA
Posts: 1,942
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

I wasn't clear in post #7....sorry.

The computer has to be adjusted (tuned) to compensate for the characteristics of that cam to ensure the best driveability. The stock program is designed for the stock cam...

The first tune on my engine had it bucking at low rpm under a slight load.Redoing that tune cleared that problem up and I suspect that's what you have going on as well.
bw_hunter is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 07:54 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
vicki711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 78
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

Originally Posted by bw_hunter
I wasn't clear in post #7....sorry.

The computer has to be adjusted (tuned) to compensate for the characteristics of that cam to ensure the best driveability. The stock program is designed for the stock cam...

The first tune on my engine had it bucking at low rpm under a slight load.Redoing that tune cleared that problem up and I suspect that's what you have going on as well.
What is your recommended action plan for this? It sounds exactly like what I have going on. Should I get a programmer for the pcm or take it and have it dyno tuned? Or what..?
vicki711 is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 08:41 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
bw_hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kissimmee, Fl, USA
Posts: 1,942
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

The hot cam is well known to the tuners so you should be quite close with a mail order tune. I used pcmforless.com (not sure if they're a supporting vendor or not ) and they have lots of options on how to get your tune....up to getting a programmed PCM send through the mail so you have zero downtime.

Note: just because I used these guys doesn't meanthey're the best.....do a little research and develop your own opinion.
bw_hunter is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 10:44 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Locruid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Monroe, Oregon
Posts: 27
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

I installed a hotcam, LT headers, 1.6rr and still havent tuned. While I can tell it does need one (running rich), I do not have any sort of lugging. On the contrary the ole girl has been positively terrifying on launching. I have slight surges (not enough to affect drive ability just enough to notice), running extremely rich and as an Auto I'm idling pretty low but other than that she runs GREAT.

Still, you should get a tune regardless. I'm waiting for my taxes to get back
Locruid is offline  
Old 01-28-2013, 05:36 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
bw_hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kissimmee, Fl, USA
Posts: 1,942
Re: Computer chip vs. programmer

Remember the gearing differences between automatics and the manuals. Add to that that us 6-speed guys can select any gear at any time...stupidly, of course. Selecting 6-th gear at 55 mph gives you about 1,000rpm...no real power there, especially in a cammed car.

If a hot cam car is terrifying, stay out of something with a big cam!
bw_hunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
frankrizz
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
09-23-2015 04:33 PM
frankrizz
2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion
1
09-23-2015 04:21 PM
fireside286
LT1 Based Engine Tech
4
09-15-2015 10:11 PM
92_RS_305
Cars For Sale
1
09-08-2015 07:47 PM



Quick Reply: Computer chip vs. programmer



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 AM.