CC306 designs?
Re: CC306 designs?
Were the heads and cam on a 396 stroker because there is no way you are losing 57hp by having a cc306 over an 847. I would say that your car is simply not running correctly or the guy was fibbing about the numbers he put down with the heads.
Re: CC306 designs?
Originally Posted by 357LT1
Kreinmc,
I got the heads from Ebay for a great price. They looked real good even though he had no flow #'s. The ports are HUGE! He told me they flowed 28X/205 @ .600. They were on a Vette with the GM847 and put down 425RWHP in CA. I just might get a bigger cam to see what it does!
Ramiro
I got the heads from Ebay for a great price. They looked real good even though he had no flow #'s. The ports are HUGE! He told me they flowed 28X/205 @ .600. They were on a Vette with the GM847 and put down 425RWHP in CA. I just might get a bigger cam to see what it does!
Ramiro
Re: CC306 designs?
Originally Posted by Kreinmc
Were the heads and cam on a 396 stroker because there is no way you are losing 57hp by having a cc306 over an 847. I would say that your car is simply not running correctly or the guy was fibbing about the numbers he put down with the heads.
Ramiro
Ramiro
Re: CC306 designs?
Originally Posted by 357LT1
Can an intake that is not ported much hurt me?
Ramiro
Ramiro
Re: CC306 designs?
Originally Posted by 97bowtie
Not to the extent that you'd only make 368 rwhp with your setup. There are a lot of guys with similar setups, on a stock LT1 intake over 400 rwhp. How many miles are on your motor?
Ramiro
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
Sep 15, 2015 11:53 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Aug 21, 2015 09:40 AM



