cc305 vs. cc306

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 19, 2003 | 02:09 AM

#16

MadMav

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 259

From: Colorado Springs

Ok, I now see you have a '94. Go with the 305 and a kit from Cmotorsports.com and have pcmforless.com tune for you. You will pass.

Mav

Mar 19, 2003 | 02:16 AM

#17

maserati82

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2000

Posts: 28

From: Orinda, CA (Bay Area)

Call Jason Cromer at Sam Taylor. Do a search for his number. Think the hotcam kit is like $465 through him. Goodluck

-Chris

Mar 19, 2003 | 02:49 AM

#18

Red_94Formula

Registered User

Joined: May 1999

Posts: 537

From: Watertown, Mass

the hot cam would sound better at idle due to its 112 lobe seperation

Mar 19, 2003 | 02:58 AM

#19

chesee48

Registered User

Joined: Dec 2001

Posts: 3,674

From: Chicago, IL

Quote:

Originally posted by maserati82
Call Jason Cromer at Sam Taylor. Do a search for his number. Think the hotcam kit is like $465 through him. Goodluck

-Chris

Yep thats the place where everyone gets it.

Jason Cromer: 1-877-726-8295
email: gmparts@samtaylor.com
Sam Taylor Buick/Cadillac Ft. Walton Beach, FL

Mar 19, 2003 | 06:32 AM

#20

RealQuick

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2002

Posts: 5,645

From: Bridgewater, MA

Quote:

Originally posted by Red_94Formula
cc305 is tame and the cc306 is wild. you can get much more power out of the cc306. but the cc306 proberly will not pass emmisions and the cc305 may pass emmisions. the cc306 sounds and feels so much meaner. that size cam is about the size limit for stock heads. also the idle is harsher with the cc306 then the cc305.

i'd say get the cc306 unless you can't pay off someone to pass emmisions.

Hey dude, I live in MA too. You know anyone that can help me out as far as emissions?