Can My LT1 Beat a '98 Cobra?
Originally posted by treyZ28
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...hreadid=122488
DOHC 4.6 is a hell of a lot better motor than the LT1. Lt1 was more or less a failure to be perfected by the LS1. Just a stepping stone. Why do u think it was only on 3 platforms for 5 yrs or so. you have no room to talk.
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...hreadid=122488
DOHC 4.6 is a hell of a lot better motor than the LT1. Lt1 was more or less a failure to be perfected by the LS1. Just a stepping stone. Why do u think it was only on 3 platforms for 5 yrs or so. you have no room to talk.
I don't care what anyone says about having a "stock" mustang....especially if the own a "cobra" leather jacket
Every guy I know with a mustang, including my brother and the 5 that he has owned, they are a bunch of liars. 99% of them have atleast exhaust and gears. The 4.6's are a lot more expensive to "serious" mod. It was like almost a grand for labor on headers on my brothers 99. I definately think the 96-98 GT's are over rated, but the cobras are a different story. They are pretty quick, especially if they are tuned, have gears and exhaust. My friend bought a 99 cobra, worst cobra ever built, and I beat it with just bolt ons. It was rated at 320 and it actually only had 275 because of the recalls. When he first drove it off the lot, the rear suspension dropped...that awesome independent suspension. Back to the topic...if he is truly stock...it will be close...good luck.
JOHN
Every guy I know with a mustang, including my brother and the 5 that he has owned, they are a bunch of liars. 99% of them have atleast exhaust and gears. The 4.6's are a lot more expensive to "serious" mod. It was like almost a grand for labor on headers on my brothers 99. I definately think the 96-98 GT's are over rated, but the cobras are a different story. They are pretty quick, especially if they are tuned, have gears and exhaust. My friend bought a 99 cobra, worst cobra ever built, and I beat it with just bolt ons. It was rated at 320 and it actually only had 275 because of the recalls. When he first drove it off the lot, the rear suspension dropped...that awesome independent suspension. Back to the topic...if he is truly stock...it will be close...good luck.JOHN
Originally posted by pennys58
I don't care what anyone says about having a "stock" mustang....especially if the own a "cobra" leather jacket
Every guy I know with a mustang, including my brother and the 5 that he has owned, they are a bunch of liars. 99% of them have atleast exhaust and gears. The 4.6's are a lot more expensive to "serious" mod. It was like almost a grand for labor on headers on my brothers 99. I definately think the 96-98 GT's are over rated, but the cobras are a different story. They are pretty quick, especially if they are tuned, have gears and exhaust. My friend bought a 99 cobra, worst cobra ever built, and I beat it with just bolt ons. It was rated at 320 and it actually only had 275 because of the recalls. When he first drove it off the lot, the rear suspension dropped...that awesome independent suspension. Back to the topic...if he is truly stock...it will be close...good luck.
JOHN
I don't care what anyone says about having a "stock" mustang....especially if the own a "cobra" leather jacket
Every guy I know with a mustang, including my brother and the 5 that he has owned, they are a bunch of liars. 99% of them have atleast exhaust and gears. The 4.6's are a lot more expensive to "serious" mod. It was like almost a grand for labor on headers on my brothers 99. I definately think the 96-98 GT's are over rated, but the cobras are a different story. They are pretty quick, especially if they are tuned, have gears and exhaust. My friend bought a 99 cobra, worst cobra ever built, and I beat it with just bolt ons. It was rated at 320 and it actually only had 275 because of the recalls. When he first drove it off the lot, the rear suspension dropped...that awesome independent suspension. Back to the topic...if he is truly stock...it will be close...good luck.JOHN
Plus condiering in order to successfully run a decent time at the track with any Mustang, you'd have to drop the stock suspension and add total aftermarket (for low 1/4's)...Z28's on the other hand have a stock suspension that is soft and prime for the track...even beats out the suspension of the SS's at the track...and can successfully run low 1/4's consistently with simple bolt-ons...
Last edited by FacelessZ; Jun 20, 2003 at 12:36 AM.
Originally posted by treyZ28
DOHC 4.6 is a hell of a lot better motor than the LT1. Lt1 was more or less a failure to be perfected by the LS1. Just a stepping stone. Why do u think it was only on 3 platforms for 5 yrs or so. you have no room to talk.
DOHC 4.6 is a hell of a lot better motor than the LT1. Lt1 was more or less a failure to be perfected by the LS1. Just a stepping stone. Why do u think it was only on 3 platforms for 5 yrs or so. you have no room to talk.
Alright, i love mustangs, camaros, trans ams, vettes, and all that domestic muscle. I think its just this simple the DOHC 96-98 Cobras rated at 305 Hp is a pretty decent match for an LT-1, the newer Cobras NA rated at 320 are to much for stock LT-1. Guys...get off fords nuts lol...why bash the mustang?...they could be driving a prelude instead? Seriously..the mustang is one of the last american muscle cars still in production kicking *** on the street. I can think of pros/cons for both the f-bodys and stangs...but just because we have more displacement doesnt mean we will automatically kick all mustangs ***'s all the time!
I def. dont see the LT-1 as being a failure. How many platforms is the LS-1 on.... that is still in production?
"Actually in the August 2002 Issue of MM&FF a STOCK 03' Cobra put down 381 RWHP, where as a 2002 SS put down 316 RWHP."
I remember that. An 03 versus the 2nd fastest 02 camaro. What a comparison. Amazing they failed to mention the factory ZL1 which had more power.
I remember that. An 03 versus the 2nd fastest 02 camaro. What a comparison. Amazing they failed to mention the factory ZL1 which had more power.
Just... okay....
someone do the math...
Start off with a stock 97 z28 and stock Cobra... any year.
$22,000 for a nice low mileage clean z28
$35,000 for a beaten on 03 Cobra
Put the difference into the Z28 and you'll be owning anything on the road.
someone do the math...
Start off with a stock 97 z28 and stock Cobra... any year.
$22,000 for a nice low mileage clean z28
$35,000 for a beaten on 03 Cobra
Put the difference into the Z28 and you'll be owning anything on the road.
Last edited by Ghettoraid; Jun 20, 2003 at 01:23 AM.
Originally posted by Ghettoraid
Just... okay....
someone do the math...
Start off with a stock 97 z28 and stock Cobra... any year.
$22,000 for a nice low mileage clean z28
$35,000 for a beaten on 03 Cobra
Put the difference into the Z28 and you'll be owning anything on the road.
Just... okay....
someone do the math...
Start off with a stock 97 z28 and stock Cobra... any year.
$22,000 for a nice low mileage clean z28
$35,000 for a beaten on 03 Cobra
Put the difference into the Z28 and you'll be owning anything on the road.
Trey, why are you so smart-assed? Just reading your posts annoys me.
Alright, i love mustangs, camaros, trans ams, vettes, and all that domestic muscle. I think its just this simple the DOHC 96-98 Cobras rated at 305 Hp is a pretty decent match for an LT-1, the newer Cobras NA rated at 320 are to much for stock LT-1. Guys...get off fords nuts lol...why bash the mustang?...they could be driving a prelude instead? Seriously..the mustang is one of the last american muscle cars still in production kicking *** on the street. I can think of pros/cons for both the f-bodys and stangs...but just because we have more displacement doesnt mean we will automatically kick all mustangs ***'s all the time!
I def. dont see the LT-1 as being a failure. How many platforms is the LS-1 on.... that is still in production?
Alright, i love mustangs, camaros, trans ams, vettes, and all that domestic muscle. I think its just this simple the DOHC 96-98 Cobras rated at 305 Hp is a pretty decent match for an LT-1, the newer Cobras NA rated at 320 are to much for stock LT-1. Guys...get off fords nuts lol...why bash the mustang?...they could be driving a prelude instead? Seriously..the mustang is one of the last american muscle cars still in production kicking *** on the street. I can think of pros/cons for both the f-bodys and stangs...but just because we have more displacement doesnt mean we will automatically kick all mustangs ***'s all the time!
I def. dont see the LT-1 as being a failure. How many platforms is the LS-1 on.... that is still in production?
Nothing but ignorance in this thread. There is more a good engine than hp. buy a $1500 fox body and put $20500 into it. see whos chasing who.
Mustang is a better platform to mod on period. Cheaper parts. Easier to work on. Better ignition. Slew of other things.
Mustang was just a better vehicle all around- maybe not in a strait line but in almost every other aspect. Thats why the camaro is gone and the cobra makes 380rwhp.
Originally posted by treyZ28
Mustang is a better platform to mod on period. Cheaper parts. Easier to work on. Better ignition. Slew of other things.
Mustang was just a better vehicle all around- maybe not in a strait line but in almost every other aspect. Thats why the camaro is gone and the cobra makes 380rwhp.
Mustang is a better platform to mod on period. Cheaper parts. Easier to work on. Better ignition. Slew of other things.
Mustang was just a better vehicle all around- maybe not in a strait line but in almost every other aspect. Thats why the camaro is gone and the cobra makes 380rwhp.
Read up on comparisons and see which car was the better in the late 90s in every aspect..
Mustangs were a more popular inferior product.. hence they are still around and fbodies aren't.. well at least for a few years.. the best mustangs and camaros are yet to come. For now the cobra rules the roost..
You do need to check your board attitude a bit..
Originally posted by FacelessZ
Main point being...Cobra's need quite a few mods in order to just keep up with stock LT1's...
Plus condiering in order to successfully run a decent time at the track with any Mustang, you'd have to drop the stock suspension and add total aftermarket (for low 1/4's)...Z28's on the other hand have a stock suspension that is soft and prime for the track...even beats out the suspension of the SS's at the track...and can successfully run low 1/4's consistently with simple bolt-ons...
Main point being...Cobra's need quite a few mods in order to just keep up with stock LT1's...
Plus condiering in order to successfully run a decent time at the track with any Mustang, you'd have to drop the stock suspension and add total aftermarket (for low 1/4's)...Z28's on the other hand have a stock suspension that is soft and prime for the track...even beats out the suspension of the SS's at the track...and can successfully run low 1/4's consistently with simple bolt-ons...


