Anyone with dyno results from LT's ?
Anyone with dyno results from LT's ?
Ok Im wondering, from all the pictures I've seen, it looks like the PaceSetter LT's are NOT equal length. The Hookers look like they are, as well as Jet- Hots, or at least very close to equal length. Has anyone ever had the dyno results, before and after of the the gains they've got with a set of long tubes? Im trying to see if its worth the extra 250$ for Jet-Hot's VS. 289$ LT Pace Setters which are suppose to be ALOT easier to install, which I like
.
I have full intentions of keeping my car for a very long time, And lots of Mods to come. If it is a less than 5hp difference, Id go with PS'ers. But if its going to be a larger difference, I want equal length headers. Also, If in a few years when I have more know-how and $$$, I went to forced induction, or heads/cam, would it make a notible differnce between Long Tubes, and equal length long tubes ??? I couldnt see it robbing it of much if any hp, maybe 1 or 2 now. And in a seriously modded car, less than 10 ... rite ?
. I have full intentions of keeping my car for a very long time, And lots of Mods to come. If it is a less than 5hp difference, Id go with PS'ers. But if its going to be a larger difference, I want equal length headers. Also, If in a few years when I have more know-how and $$$, I went to forced induction, or heads/cam, would it make a notible differnce between Long Tubes, and equal length long tubes ??? I couldnt see it robbing it of much if any hp, maybe 1 or 2 now. And in a seriously modded car, less than 10 ... rite ?
I hardly see any noticable difference between the 3. A longtube header is basically a longtube header. I wouldnt be making too much of a deal on it. I bought the pacesetters because i dont see the need to spend like $600 for headers, and the pacesetters were easier to install.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Sep 7, 2015 10:56 AM



