LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Anyone with dyno results from LT's ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 09:15 PM
  #1  
HardcoreRM125's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,628
From: Pgh, PA
Anyone with dyno results from LT's ?

Ok Im wondering, from all the pictures I've seen, it looks like the PaceSetter LT's are NOT equal length. The Hookers look like they are, as well as Jet- Hots, or at least very close to equal length. Has anyone ever had the dyno results, before and after of the the gains they've got with a set of long tubes? Im trying to see if its worth the extra 250$ for Jet-Hot's VS. 289$ LT Pace Setters which are suppose to be ALOT easier to install, which I like .

I have full intentions of keeping my car for a very long time, And lots of Mods to come. If it is a less than 5hp difference, Id go with PS'ers. But if its going to be a larger difference, I want equal length headers. Also, If in a few years when I have more know-how and $$$, I went to forced induction, or heads/cam, would it make a notible differnce between Long Tubes, and equal length long tubes ??? I couldnt see it robbing it of much if any hp, maybe 1 or 2 now. And in a seriously modded car, less than 10 ... rite ?
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 09:18 PM
  #2  
95_LT1_6SPD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,093
From: Caledon Ontario Canada
I hardly see any noticable difference between the 3. A longtube header is basically a longtube header. I wouldnt be making too much of a deal on it. I bought the pacesetters because i dont see the need to spend like $600 for headers, and the pacesetters were easier to install.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fift5
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
11
Oct 1, 2015 10:31 AM
HAWG
Drag Racing Technique
2
Sep 25, 2015 11:41 AM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
Sep 11, 2015 06:12 AM
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Sep 7, 2015 10:56 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.