LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

ai trickflow or AFR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 09:25 PM
  #61  
flyinZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,290
From: IL
Anybody else have an update on their AI TrickFlow heads, or a their new set of AFR's?
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 11:39 PM
  #62  
<Puck>'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 321
This thread is ancient.

If I were in the market for heads, which I am, I would wait for results from some lloyd and AI ported 21* trickflows before making any purchase . Don't forget to compare the Dart's as well!

They may be worth the wait.
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 09:21 AM
  #63  
pineapplesink6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 205
Originally Posted by Denny McLain
That's one hell of an endorsement for AFR. Probably put them into backorder status.

FYI.... The Trick Flows that I own done by Lloyd and Trevor flow:

Intake Exhaust (no pipe)
.300 204 151
.400 259 186
.500 291 209
.600 304 218
.700 308 224

This is with a 222 cc intake port, 2.08 intake valves and 1.625 exhaust flowed on a very conservative flow bench. Think it was with a 4.06 bore. The valves were backcut for enhanced low flow numbers vs higher lift flow numbers. Only have .635 lift....so why emphasize the top end except to post some big number?? Should also add this is with small chambers for higher compression as larger chambers yield a tad higher flow numbers.

These heads are two years old and if I were to do new ones, I'd look real strongly at Brodix or Dart and probably do titanium intake valves to make it easy on the springs.
That really isnt impressive for a 222cc intake port.
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 10:21 AM
  #64  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
Originally Posted by pineapplesink6
That really isnt impressive for a 222cc intake port.
And you do realise that flow numbers and port size are only a small part of how a motor or car preforms, correct?
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 10:45 AM
  #65  
pineapplesink6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 205
Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
And you do realise that flow numbers and port size are only a small part of how a motor or car preforms, correct?
I certainly do realize that. But, I personally would rather have a 200cc head that flows 310cfm, then a 227cc head that flows 310cfm. The 200cc head is more efficient, and has much better port velocity! I have been in cars with lazy cylinder heads, and they are exactly that lazy until they hit 3500 plus.

Of course there is more things to consider when making good power for a street driven combination, but cylinder heads are at the top!

Last edited by pineapplesink6; Mar 11, 2009 at 11:01 AM.
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #66  
Denny McLain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 752
From: Double Oak TX
Originally Posted by pineapplesink6
That really isnt impressive for a 222cc intake port.
They were so "isn't impressive' that AFR wanted the heads to check out the port work. No dope.

They were done by a person who used work for Nickens Bro Pro Stock engine building shop. His numbers are very conservative, expecially to those of well know shops like Agostino whom you've done business with.

The heads I got from Agostino flowed about 50 cc less than his flow sheets said when sent of to B&B performance. Pretty easy to make up fake numbers, but that can make the real numbers look "isn't impressive."

Also keep in mind these heads are four years old, things have changed but the car is the highest hp N/A street driven Ltx C4 on the Corvette Forum. No dope. They did something right.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
G-BODYT56
Parts For Sale
6
Jan 14, 2022 11:14 PM
13qtr
Parts For Sale
24
Oct 28, 2016 08:11 PM
football4life
Cars For Sale
2
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 AM
Bigtoyz97
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
0
Sep 21, 2015 01:44 PM
95craz28
Fuel and Ignition
11
Sep 12, 2015 07:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 PM.