LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

ai trickflow or AFR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 07:32 AM
  #16  
Denny McLain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 752
From: Double Oak TX
Originally Posted by jpack24
I was working on a brand new set of AFR 210 eliminators yesterday. Their wet flow technology gets some great numbers. They came assembled and made it here in a couple of weeks. The runners are done very well compared to most i have seen and their rated numbers are right out of the box. Very very nice pieces. They have all the LS1 style valves and are tuliped and edges are rounded for increased flow. Installed height on springs were right on the money for each. Only thing we did was to clean up all the edges a bit so there were no chips to be dislodged and into the engine or oil pump. This should be done with any aftermarket set of heads. If you decide to go with these heads, don't spend the extra $$$ to clean up the CNC marks. They are very minimal and spending an hour with a drum would clean these up very easily. Overall, for 2k set of heads, got exactly what you would expect, basically a ready to bolt on head with great #'s.

Another route to go is with a little project I have been working on. I have a set of LE heads that I am going to bolt on and see what kind of gains they get over the as purchased LE heads. Currently the heads have been reworked through the guides. Drilled out the current guides to accept smaller sized ones to accommodate the new valves I will be running. They are Titanium LS1 valves. I will be using all titanium hardware as well. What this will do is create substantially less mass and allow for higher revs with a ton less valve float.
This is just something I am experimenting with and for those out there reading this, watch for my post come mid April to see the results. I suspect when all is said and done I will see flows as good as AFR 195's.
Are you sure they are really doing wet flow work or is it just marketing? Another company has been promoting this for a year and make sense. Where are you getting this information from?

From what I've seen from heads ported using wet flow the dry flow numbers usually show up as being less than one using dry flow only.
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 10:47 AM
  #17  
rickreeves1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 270
From: La.
Originally Posted by flyinZ
Who's Bert?
He's the one on the right.




Bret Bauer is a guy that does custom cams. I think his email is bret@bauer-racing.com.
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 11:18 AM
  #18  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by rickreeves1
He's the one on the right.




Bret Bauer is a guy that does custom cams. I think his email is bret@bauer-racing.com.

...and do just as good of job taking your money and picking the harshest lobes for your street car out of the Comp catalog. Avoid him. There are a lot of legitimate guys out there who actually do it for a living, and do it well.
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #19  
STSturboLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 77
Has anyone tried the TEA ported Trickflows? They show very impressive midlift numbers, even better than AI Trickflows. And a little cheaper to boot.
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 02:17 PM
  #20  
slomarao's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
i have heard about some good stuff from them and gtp. Far and few though, not like ai and le.
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 04:16 PM
  #21  
STSturboLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 77
I've been tempted to try the TEA's, since they claim their chambers are 65cc after the CNC process (same as the AFR's). By the way, my build will use a new forged rotating assembly, but the piston dish is a little on the small side (-16cc) for running boost with stock sized chambers, which is why I'm looking for the larger chambers. I got a great deal on the machined block and rotating assembly, and it's already balanced, so I'd rather not mess with changing pistons at this point. That is the main reason why I'm not considering stock heads for my build.
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 04:44 PM
  #22  
jpack24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 329
From: Sugar Grove, ILLINOIS
Originally Posted by Denny McLain
Are you sure they are really doing wet flow work or is it just marketing? Another company has been promoting this for a year and make sense. Where are you getting this information from?

From what I've seen from heads ported using wet flow the dry flow numbers usually show up as being less than one using dry flow only.
I am positive they are doing this. My info is from 70's dragracing legend Jerry Clayton. (Keeling and Clayton California Charger) They work on all my stuff. They are also a dealer for AFR. I am at their shop almost daily either working on my junk or watch them working on stuff. Example of the stuff they do.......





Old Jan 14, 2008 | 08:24 PM
  #23  
zaxon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 65
From: Flagstaff, AZ
I'm waiting to get some ported darts myself
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 09:06 PM
  #24  
Denny McLain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 752
From: Double Oak TX
[QUOTE=jpack24;5110308]I am positive they are doing this. My info is from 70's dragracing legend Jerry Clayton. (Keeling and Clayton California Charger) They work on all my stuff. They are also a dealer for AFR. I am at their shop almost daily either working on my junk or watch them working on stuff. Example of the stuff they do.......
QUOTE]

Pretty impressive!

[QUOTE=jpack24;5110308]Their wet flow technology gets some great numbers. They came assembled and made it here in a couple of weeks. The runners are done very well compared to most i have se)en and their rated numbers are right out of the box. QUOTE]

Where are you getting these flow numbers? Sounds like you have access to a wet flow bench to valide them right?? I posted what my Trick Flows actually flow from Tevor Johnsons (dry) flow bench. (formerly worked for the Nickins Bro whom do the R&D for the current Dodge Pro stock program) If you'd like some picturers, I'll gladly post some. So......what do the heads your talking about actually flow?

Tell me more..... post what you have. Curious minds want to know.
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 09:07 PM
  #25  
MeanGreen97Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,523
From: TX
Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
oh, sweet jesus. Now Bert is in the head business...couldn't be cylinder head business though...


Yep, go look up all his stellar results
Troll much?
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #26  
jpack24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 329
From: Sugar Grove, ILLINOIS
[qoute]Where are you getting these flow numbers? Sounds like you have access to a wet flow bench to valide them right?? I posted what my Trick Flows actually flow from Tevor Johnsons (dry) flow bench. (formerly worked for the Nickins Bro whom do the R&D for the current Dodge Pro stock program) If you'd like some picturers, I'll gladly post some. So......what do the heads your talking about actually flow?

Tell me more..... post what you have. Curious minds want to know.[/QUOTE]

The AFR's have yet to be flowed, my experimental LE heads that I will be running this year are still getting work done. I am still waiting on on a few things to get them wrapped up. Basically they will be stock heads that were ported by Lloyd some time ago. I got them from a friend for a couple bucks. The valves that are going in are LS1 styled and the ones used in the new AFR eliminators. Figured if they get good numbers and have better control over valve float, might as well try them on mine. This year I will be running just a 355 "0" decked with a stock crank and 6.125 crower rods with Mahle coated flat tops. This will move the pins higher up in the pistons and they will be pretty light weight @ 406 grams. Gonna throw a 847 cam I have laying around see what she will do. Not a rocket motor but should be ok while I build up my 396 FI motor. The current motor I am doing is just so I have something to run this year and do some R&D. I'll post up results and flow numbers when they are done. For now, that's all I have.

Old Jan 14, 2008 | 10:17 PM
  #27  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by MeanGreen97Z
Troll much?
not buying into the illusion does not make one a troll. are you sheeple?
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 12:15 AM
  #28  
Built LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 276
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Denny McLain
That's one hell of an endorsement for AFR. Probably put them into backorder status.

You're kidding, right?
Old Aug 29, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #29  
rickreeves1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 270
From: La.
Originally Posted by jpack24

The AFR's have yet to be flowed, my experimental LE heads that I will be running this year are still getting work done. I am still waiting on on a few things to get them wrapped up. Basically they will be stock heads that were ported by Lloyd some time ago. I got them from a friend for a couple bucks. The valves that are going in are LS1 styled and the ones used in the new AFR eliminators. Figured if they get good numbers and have better control over valve float, might as well try them on mine. This year I will be running just a 355 "0" decked with a stock crank and 6.125 crower rods with Mahle coated flat tops. This will move the pins higher up in the pistons and they will be pretty light weight @ 406 grams. Gonna throw a 847 cam I have laying around see what she will do. Not a rocket motor but should be ok while I build up my 396 FI motor. The current motor I am doing is just so I have something to run this year and do some R&D. I'll post up results and flow numbers when they are done. For now, that's all I have.

What was the outcome?

Last edited by rickreeves1; Aug 29, 2008 at 03:16 PM.
Old Aug 29, 2008 | 02:38 PM
  #30  
IllusionalTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,542
From: Long Island, NY ; Norfolk, VA
Originally Posted by MeanGreen97Z
Troll much?
same guy's every single time....if more start jumping on the wagon.. then we should be concerned... I've had nothing but great dealings w/ bret, and his cam's make power.. SO no complaints here...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.