Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Originally Posted by engineermike
I flowed my AFR 210 Race Readys on a Superflow SF-1020 with a 4.030" bore and got 280 cfm intake and 218 cfm exhaust. We've seen even better numbers from the 220's, Competition Package porting, etc. . . The Trick Flows (nor any stock head short of LS7) will not do anywhere near that. HOWEVER, we got no-so-good results from the 195 cc and smaller AFR heads. If you want something smaller than 210 cc's, get the Trick Flows.
The fact of the matter is there's only so much flow you can get out of a 23 deg head with standard port and pushrod locations. The 210 Competition Ported heads are just about as good as you can do with those limitations.
Mike
The fact of the matter is there's only so much flow you can get out of a 23 deg head with standard port and pushrod locations. The 210 Competition Ported heads are just about as good as you can do with those limitations.
Mike
Hmmmm...Trickflows won't do 280cfm intake???
http://www.advancedinduction.com/flo...1Flowsheet.jpg
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Originally Posted by 97WS6NY
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
^agreed. When you see some of the newer LE/AI stuff doing close to 280cfm intake, it's impressive. He said the race ready comp ported AFRs though, that's why i threw in the AI ported chart. Sh*t, Lloyd did a set of LT4 heads (stock) for someone on here a couple of weeks ago and they put like 302cfm intake. These days i just don't see the AFRs being worth the money. And, like your setup, for that amount, you can definately go a better route - All pro's, brodix, etc.
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Loyd done my porting on bare trick flows i sent him. Valves are 2.08, 1.625. I been aiming to call him and get the flow numbers. Sure would like to know what the flowed.
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Originally Posted by 97WS6NY
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Originally Posted by 97WS6NY
Hmmmm...Trickflows won't do 280cfm intake???
Originally Posted by JustNO
SF-1020 gives very conservative numbers.
Mike
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Flow benches are like dyno's nowaday's.. That not really sufficient for people to compare one head porter to the next unless they're done on the same bench same day type of thing.. I can see someone's number's being lower than the next by maybe 5-10cfm from one bench to the next.. But if we're talking 20-30 then we have issue's...
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Originally Posted by 97WS6NY
None the less, if you are gonna compare offerings, you gotta compare ported to ported. The race ready is not an "as cast" peice.
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
On the AFR site, it lists the 210 race readys as doing 275cfm intake and 220cfm exhaust, good numbers, and the competition package jumps to 297/230.
BUT these numbers are on a 4.125" BORE, and WITH 1 7/8" exhaust pipe. While I am not saying they aren't a decent head, I sure think the TFS heads can get you close, with less invested.
And for the original poster I think that is the point. His builder said the TFS heads were crap. I just don't find that to be the case after having seen a couple myself. I still think a full custom port job on the 210 will probably outflow a full port on the TFS heads, but not by alot I don't think, and when it comes down to cost/performance, personally I would go witht the TFS heads, and then something else, like all pro's, or some converted gen 1 heads.
Having said that, I have seen quite a few people make great power with the 210s (with custom porting) so everything is with a grain of salt.
BUT these numbers are on a 4.125" BORE, and WITH 1 7/8" exhaust pipe. While I am not saying they aren't a decent head, I sure think the TFS heads can get you close, with less invested.
And for the original poster I think that is the point. His builder said the TFS heads were crap. I just don't find that to be the case after having seen a couple myself. I still think a full custom port job on the 210 will probably outflow a full port on the TFS heads, but not by alot I don't think, and when it comes down to cost/performance, personally I would go witht the TFS heads, and then something else, like all pro's, or some converted gen 1 heads.
Having said that, I have seen quite a few people make great power with the 210s (with custom porting) so everything is with a grain of salt.
Last edited by 97WS6NY; Mar 15, 2006 at 06:46 AM.
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Originally Posted by 97WS6NY
On the AFR site, it lists the 210 race readys as doing 275cfm intake . . . BUT these numbers are on a 4.125" BORE, . . .
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Originally Posted by 97WS6NY
None the less, if you are gonna compare offerings, you gotta compare ported to ported. The race ready is not an "as cast" peice.
I guess if you really want to compare unported to unported, you can get unported bare AFR210's for $1039 and unported bare TFS 195's for $919. Price gap closes quite a bit, doesn't it? I have no idea what these heads would flow, but with a 15 cc bigger runner and larger valve, I'm betting on the AFR's.
Mike
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Nope, those "BARE" non ported AFR's don't even come close to being 210 or flowing anything. If you saw them you would understand.
The TFS heads out of the box OTOH you can actually run if you wanted to, but at $950 a set why not port them? That works out to the cost of the AFR Race Ready heads or the Comp heads if you pay that much for porting.
Bret
The TFS heads out of the box OTOH you can actually run if you wanted to, but at $950 a set why not port them? That works out to the cost of the AFR Race Ready heads or the Comp heads if you pay that much for porting.
Bret
Re: Afr Lt1 Heads Vs. Trickflow's
Why everybody started to hate AFR ? I saw lots of company changed their package from AFR to TFS. Golen, Ai etc.. Before I decided to get AFR heads I made lots of research here and I waited 16 weeks for my 210cc AFR competition heads, and now I read these.


