LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

500hp Lt1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 10:18 AM
  #16  
DarkKnight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 90
From: Pennsylvania
So would 475 be more resonable?
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 05:31 PM
  #17  
95fbformula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 111
Originally Posted by DarkKnight
OUCH! Man, you make it seem like I'm a deaf and blind mute trying to walk across an imaginary bridge inside a tunnel that isnt there. I did do some research with guys making between 4 and 500HP. I'd like to direct your comment to them to see what they say...
LOL sry man didn't mean to sound like an *** just trying to say out of all the parts you listed good they maybe you didn't list some of the most important things to give a good power estimate. Who is porting the heads and what they are expected to flow along with any intake porting and cam. Now you did list a cam but with that cam you probably wont make your goal I would look into a custom ro something bigger even the gm847 would probably make more hp. and sine you are planing a 383 500FWHP is a fine goal or 475. as long as you are happy with the results who cares. being a 383 you might only make 420rwhp but have loads of torque all over.
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 06:28 PM
  #18  
DarkKnight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 90
From: Pennsylvania
No, its cool. But I have looked into this a bit and not just throwing something together. The porting and polishing is being done through a guy that came recommended through a local car club. Its a father & son business, been building motors since 1974, was reccommended by two shops in the area as well. They built a motor for a guy in the club with a '90 IROC L98 but he stayed with the 350. The intake will be ported as well to match the heads. I looked at the GM847 and it seems comparable to the CC306 with an edge to the GM847. You do bring up several interesting points. This is not a track car and may see the strip every now and then but mostly the street. I'm told 383s are known more for TQ then HP. So, yeah, maybe your right and I'm not looking at the big picture. Looking at it that way I would then hope I'd be making over 400 at the wheels with lots of TQ. Now, smooth and tight is better for TQ, right? Bigger and wider is better for HP? I guess thats going to be the factor in the head flow right?
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 06:58 PM
  #19  
89TramsAmGTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 454
From: So. Cal
I agree in that the heads will be the most important issue. Spend your money on the heads. Also you will need the intake manifold ported to match the flow of the heads. From what I have read Lloyd can do this. You don't want the intake choking the heads.

You will need all the supporting mods such as a 58mm throttle body, good cold air intake and a good flowing exhaust system. One local guru swears by the monoblade throttle body on the LT1.
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 07:59 PM
  #20  
95fbformula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 111
Originally Posted by DarkKnight
Now, smooth and tight is better for TQ, right? Bigger and wider is better for HP? I guess thats going to be the factor in the head flow right?
That I cant answer and wont even try do not really have enough knowledge about flow to answer all i can say is I still haven't decided on who i will go with for head porting. One opinion of advice check if the shop you want to have port your heads has done any lt1s before. even thought very similar they do differer from regular SBC heads in chamber size and flow.
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #21  
DarkKnight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 90
From: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by 95fbformula
That I cant answer and wont even try do not really have enough knowledge about flow to answer all i can say is I still haven't decided on who i will go with for head porting. One opinion of advice check if the shop you want to have port your heads has done any lt1s before. even thought very similar they do differer from regular SBC heads in chamber size and flow.
What? You just gave me all that info about the "cons" of my setup and that it wont make the power I was hoping and suggestions and now your saying you dont have the knowledge?
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 10:41 PM
  #22  
95fbformula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 111
its not that i cant suggest things its that the small vs large port thing has been debated over and over and just causes a big argument. example Ai biggest port is 200cc LEs is 208cc which is better both are pretty much equal. a 383 needs a bigger port though to flow the air for the extra cubes so I wouldn't go to small. Best advice would be to talk to llyod elliot (eportworks.com) or other head porters about your set-up even if you want to use the shop you mentioned you will get a general idea of what you need. from the information i have gather during my build though you will want something with a mid to big port.

Last edited by 95fbformula; Jul 21, 2007 at 10:44 PM.
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #23  
DarkKnight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 90
From: Pennsylvania
I got ya. The general consensus from what I researched seems to be wider=more power less torque smaller=less power more torque. Some of it consisted of the L98 with its long, tight runner design choked power but made gobs of torque - 245HP 350TQ. The LT1 with its short, open runner design punched up the power to 300 but TQ suffered with 320. In an article in Car Craft they built a 383 LT4 for a truck having the LT4 heads ported and polished but they kept the stock valves noting that going larger would suffer torque and torque was paramount in their build.
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 11:37 PM
  #24  
Built LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 276
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by DarkKnight
Is this good for a 500FWHP LT1?


Ported And Polished LT1 Heads Gasket Matched
If you put more effort into the heads, then yes, you should hit 500 FWHP.
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 06:40 AM
  #25  
DarkKnight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 90
From: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by Built LT1
If you put more effort into the heads, then yes, you should hit 500 FWHP.
Ported and polished, gasket matched to ported intake, 3 angle valve job.
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 08:59 AM
  #26  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Ported and polished is very generic terminology. That's what I was reacting to. Starting with stock castings, you need about as good port work as is available to hit 500hp. Also, and I am not sure of this but am fairly certain, you need quite a bit of intake work on a stock LT1 intake to approach this kind of hp. There are also many better cams than the CC306 out there, though I think you could make 500hp with it if everything else were right. To make best use of that cam, you also need a bit more static compression.

Rich
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 06:57 PM
  #27  
DarkKnight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 90
From: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by rskrause
Ported and polished is very generic terminology. That's what I was reacting to. Starting with stock castings, you need about as good port work as is available to hit 500hp. Also, and I am not sure of this but am fairly certain, you need quite a bit of intake work on a stock LT1 intake to approach this kind of hp. There are also many better cams than the CC306 out there, though I think you could make 500hp with it if everything else were right. To make best use of that cam, you also need a bit more static compression.

Rich
I dont know what to tell you about the port job. This guy doesnt seem to have a set up like a "stage, level, phase or package" of port jobs. He came recommended and refferenced by several other guys. Been in the business for 25 or more years. The CC306 cam seems to have given other LT1 owners in the 340-370rwhp range with stock heads.
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #28  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Years in buisiness might be a good thing if the guy is capable of learning and evolving.
On the otherhand if he still thinks 2.02 valves and a 3/4 race cam are the hot ticket well then it is a BAD thing.

RESULTS are the only thing that matters, results from a similar application at that. The more I learn the more I realize that not even happy customers are an indicator of a good job. Seen a lot of guys thank vendors that screwed them bad.
The guy could be awesome with some old school setups and not understand the sublties of the more modern high velocity heads
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 11:09 PM
  #29  
dannyum89's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 177
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Depends on wether you are talking rear wheel, flywheel, flywheel with ZERO accessories.

Might make 500 flywheel with zero accessories then again A LOT of LT1 do but they are not tested like that.

One popular engine vendor has a 520hp longblock known to only put 370-390 down through an A4. He is honest, just no accessories not even a waterpump, dyno headers rather than something that fits a car, tune could be such that it would self destruct under the load of a car.

That said I think you need to do more research on your combo, several part there I see that I would rather not see.
I happen to own one of these 396 long blocks. I usually put down 480HP at the wheels with a 100 shot but then I gotta clean the whole engine bay because im shooting oil out of everywhere. lol
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 01:04 AM
  #30  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Why worry about exactly how much hp it will make? Just advising you to spend money where it will do the most good and let the numbers come in where they come in.

Rich



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.