LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

5.7 or 6 inch rods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 10:38 PM
  #1  
magnumv8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 564
From: Quad Cities, IL
5.7 or 6 inch rods

I am getting ready to order my rotating assembly for my 383 and just need to know which rods I should go with. It will be a NA LT1 with forged crank, rods, pistons. My machine shop said 5.7, but I see so many using the 6 inch rods. Is one more suitable for blower setups and one for NA?

Just want to make sure I get the right ones.

Thanks
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 10:56 PM
  #2  
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,784
From: Jacksonville
Usually you use a 5.7 inch rod on a blown 383 because it allows you to run lower compression and more boost. For a NA or nitrous motor, I'd stick some 6.0" rods in it myself.
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 01:51 AM
  #3  
96LT14u2Nv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 980
From: batavia, ohio
ive always heard 5.7 rod stroker motors are easier to build. talk over pros and cons w/ your machine shop and go from there.
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 06:22 AM
  #4  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
This has a had a lot of discussion, you might want to do a search. But without getting into the why's and wherefore's here's my take.

NA 383: 5.875 or 6" rod.
SC 383: 5.7" rod.

Rich Krause
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 07:35 AM
  #5  
mongse_1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,450
From: Belleville, IL
I ran 5.7" rods on my turbo 383. Never really considered the 6" rods. The thinking w/ the 6" rod is that there will be less stress on the outer cylinder wall because of the longer stroke. The rod/stroke ratio is obviously better w/ the longer rod as well. However, you will have to clearance the bottom of the cylinders to clear the 6" rod. I've seen a motor that didn't do this...ouch.
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 01:55 PM
  #6  
magnumv8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 564
From: Quad Cities, IL
thanks for the help.

I will go with the 6 inch rods. They were also reccomended by one of our favorite vendors; just wanted to get some more imput to make sure.

thanks
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 02:36 PM
  #7  
Green95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 181
From: Wilton, CA, USA
The 6" rod isn't as desirable for longevity reasons, due to the fact that you have more piston slap at the upper end of the cylinder because the wrist pin is closer to the ring lands thus making the piston shorter in height. However, with a 383 the stroke isn't huge so this shouldn't be a problem on a N/A motor. With a turboed are nitroused motor some prefer the 5.875 rod because the piston would be a bit more stable and wear less in the cylinder, PLUS with a shorter rod you won't hear the pistons when the engine is cold several thousand miles down the road because they would be more stable
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 02:42 PM
  #8  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
I allways assumed the longer rod would be easier for wear, because of the straighter shot at the bore. The 5.7 will have less dwell at the top and bottom than the 6.0 so a SC application should use the 5.7 rods.
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 02:48 PM
  #9  
Green95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 181
From: Wilton, CA, USA
The longer the rod with a stroker application, the more the engine will wear near the top of the cylinder. THis is not to say it won't last a TON of miles, it will just cause the cylinder to go out of round sooner because there is less skirt on a shorter piston allowing it to bang around a bit more.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
secbase8
Parts Wanted
3
Sep 8, 2015 07:11 PM
colts0455
LT1 Based Engine Tech
22
Jul 24, 2015 04:51 PM
Noct
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Jul 14, 2015 01:18 AM
mrwz28
Cars For Sale
0
Jul 8, 2015 09:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 AM.