LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

427 LT1.....How would I go about doing this.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #31  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Originally Posted by OldSStroker
$12K for a 427 LT1 might be low.
Yea. . . WAY low, especially if you want SBC heads equivalent to LS7 heads. Then you're talking $20k+.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #32  
engineermike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Originally Posted by Mike96z
. . .You can flow the right about into a head, just have to have te perfect head to fuel it.
What?!?

Originally Posted by Mike96z
Im sure that it wont cost 12k cuz thats how much a LS7 is.
Again... What?!? What makes you think it would be cheaper to build a 427 LT1 than buy an LS7?

Mike
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 01:50 PM
  #33  
Z28SORR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,768
From: Friendswood, TX, USA
Originally Posted by Casey_SS
First, I completely agree with what most of the others are saying about this being an expensive idea, better ways to get there, etc., etc.

However, you didn't ask whether it was wise just how to do it - honoring the spirit of your question, here's where I would start:
http://www.theengineshop.com/prods_p...townBlocks.htm

Wouldn't be a "pure" LT1 but if I just HAD to have 427ci in my 93-97 F-body, that block is what I'd start with and figure out the heads / intake options from there to get where I wanted to be. Just my $.02 worth...
This would not be an "LT" anything!! And he wants an LT 427.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 01:56 PM
  #34  
Z28SORR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,768
From: Friendswood, TX, USA
You've had your question answered. You sleeve an LT block to get a 4.125" bore and stock it to 4.00". Then you work out the cam/heads/intake.

I definitely think you should do this! Hell, it's only money. When you've reached $15,000 post back and let us know how it's going!!!
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 04:11 PM
  #35  
Daniel6718's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,475
From: Garland, tx
lol @ this guy, his dads home ported heads with stock valves on a 388 made 500hp? your dad need to go talk to lloyd and afr tfs ect, because he be making some big money....
a 400+ cubic inch lt1 is a waste without afr heads or sb 2.2, put an lsx in it and save alot of money.....
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #36  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
If you ask me its not smart. Look what you have to wrok with....who ever posted you can go to a 4.090 bore is crazy.

Even if you do build(and 20K is low) it won't last long...not in a LT block......you have to take alot of meat out for all of that.

I know someone that tried to build a 400+ inch LT motor....3 blocks later he just went back to a 388...did some more headwork and impressed all of his "FANS".....and I think he was only trying to do 411 inch motor
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 04:33 PM
  #37  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Originally Posted by Daniel6718
lol @ this guy, his dads home ported heads with stock valves on a 388 made 500hp? your dad need to go talk to lloyd and afr tfs ect, because he be making some big money....
a 400+ cubic inch lt1 is a waste without afr heads or sb 2.2, put an lsx in it and save alot of money.....

500 at the crank on an engine dyno is not that much AI, LE and others deliver that every day. Once restricted by in car intake and exhaust accessories and drivetrain losses that is well under 400rwhp through an A4.

Far as making a 427 LT1, there is an Impala guy with a 434 "LT1" started with a Donovan aluminum block and machined it for everything that seperates an LT1 from a Gen 1. He has AFR 227s modified LT1 intake, stock WP and stock opti, hydraulic roller cam and a blower best run sofar is like 9.6 at 146mph 4400lbs raceweight. He has been invited to the Pump Gas Drags again this year so look for magazine coverage on the car. Oh yeah 4L60E and 8.5" 10 bolt too which is what these came with.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 04:47 PM
  #38  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
There was a guy who used to post here about 5 years ago that built two different versions of a 421ci LT1. He had the dyno charts, photos and full specs available. Ultimate life of the engine was never revealed.

4.090" bore x 4.000" stroke
4.030" bore x 4.125" stroke

The 4.090" bore was done on a block selected for its sonically tested wall thicknesses, and the bores were recentered to put the meat on the thrust side. It made some fairly decent HP (750+) with a decent shot of nitrous.

Ultimately, he failed to deliver on his promises on some fairly radical engines he had promised to board members, and disappeared
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 05:00 PM
  #39  
Heatmaker's Avatar
Advanced Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,874
From: Under The Hood
If you want to throw away your hard earned money... just send it to me... and I promise to spend my time getting drunk and partying with it.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 08:35 PM
  #40  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Only if you invite us Heatmaker.
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #41  
imnotfast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 125
From: Northville,Mi,US
First I would start with one of the 20 or so race blocks based off the bowtie's
They go 4.155 no problem. Look for casting 202A

Last edited by imnotfast; Feb 23, 2007 at 11:07 PM.
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 11:37 AM
  #42  
Panic!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13
shouldnt it be possible? i mean most car enthusiast dont even know what the numbers mean: 302, 350, 454, 440, 502, etc, its all bore sizes. I'm a cnc machinist and I'm trying to find a way to bore out the biggest size possible, without changing every freaking thing under the hood. bigger bore is a bigbig power gain. I kinda just learned about the whole engine numbers thing, always wondered why there were bigger numbered small blocks that are bigger in size than bigblocks. it should be possible so long as your car can handle it?
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 11:45 AM
  #43  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
If your a CNC machinist..what do you machine? If you understand how a block is cast and what you have to work with......it's simple

The other thing alot of you guys posting don't under stand that when you push things to the limits like this your riding on barrowed time....So why not do it right to begin with


My friend bought a $21,000 engine last year for his 69 camaro....one of 3 motors he owns, This was a 454 SBC.....it lasted 2 weeks B/C he tried to cut corners....car made 814 at the wheels and he got 10 passes out of it.....now if he would have spent a little extra and gotten a better block.....the 454sbc would still be here with us. Trying to do it with an LT1 is just stupid the way I see it......seems like you want to prove it can be done more than you want the power .......and this will just make you broke, I talked to a few people yesterday.....when I asked if it could be done for less than 20K they laughed at me and said why even bother.

You can buy a 1100 h.p. BBC turn key for 17,000
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 12:55 PM
  #44  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Good post Mike.
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #45  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally Posted by Panic!
shouldnt it be possible? i mean most car enthusiast dont even know what the numbers mean: 302, 350, 454, 440, 502, etc, its all bore sizes. I'm a cnc machinist and I'm trying to find a way to bore out the biggest size possible, without changing every freaking thing under the hood. bigger bore is a bigbig power gain. I kinda just learned about the whole engine numbers thing, always wondered why there were bigger numbered small blocks that are bigger in size than bigblocks. it should be possible so long as your car can handle it?
Big bore is not a big power gain, if it causes the cylinder walls to be so thin they can't contain the pressure generated by the combustion process. Or deform under the thrust loads of the pistons. Everyone has sort of explained that you aren't going to be able to go much past 0.090" over with an LT1 block, and even that will take a "select" block. That's less than a 5% increase in the area of the cylinder. How does that make "big power"? We've suggested that sleeving is a way to go, but that has been completely ignored.

Or you might want to try a "search" on the "Advanced Tech" forum. I remember a couple years ago some guy from Saudi Arabia ridiculed all of us who recommended limiting the overbore to 0.060", claiming that they routinely bored LT1's to 4.120" and made huge HP..... sounds like someone you need to track down, since he's obviously a lot smarter than all of us.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.