LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

396 Lt1

Old Oct 21, 2007 | 08:50 PM
  #1  
oneledvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 232
From: North of Detroit
396 Lt1

I've heard 396 Lt1 engine blocks have to be clearanced to the point where the strength and structural integrity are compromised. Is this true? And if so, is there aftermarket engine block available that can bolt right in place of the factory LT1?
Old Oct 21, 2007 | 08:57 PM
  #2  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
no aftermarket LT blocks.

I don't like grinding to do a 396.......it is so easy to hit water its not funny. I don't see any advantage of a 396 over a 383 anyway.......The 383 is even tight.

Doing them on a CNC I know people that have hit water...so I think most people do them by hand.....Mine I even milled the head bolt down slightly so I would not have to grind too much and I tried to get around .050 on each one
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 01:45 AM
  #3  
94/96ZsM6s's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 109
From: Ceresco, NE
when i had the machine shop put my 396 short block together they were concerned the clearencing would hit a water jacket, and luckily they never ran into that problem. IMO if i had to do it all over again i would go with a 383, because of the clearencing issues,stress on the rings from large rod ratio,tehy make nearly idenical power numbers and the fact that when i go the short block back and turned it over to see the crankshaft counterweight BARLY miss the bottom of the piston. Just stick with a 383, if you really want more displacement its time for a LSx motor or a BBC.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 03:53 AM
  #4  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Agree with what has already been posted. Even a 383 is stretching the limit of what the readily available heads and intake can support. It is even possible to hit water clearancing for a 383 - depends on the rods used and the casting - there is seemingly a lot of variability in the water jackets.

Rich
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 02:10 PM
  #5  
oneledvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 232
From: North of Detroit
I figured as much. Thanks for the info!!

Jim
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 06:23 PM
  #6  
96lt4c4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 33
From: Bardstown, KY
There is a guy, Pete K, on the Corvette Forum that uses block fill. He fills the bottom 1/2 to 1 inch of the block. Then he grinds away. He said he has ground into the block fill and never had any problems.

Nor any overheating...

Last edited by 96lt4c4; Oct 22, 2007 at 06:25 PM.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 06:40 PM
  #7  
chrism400's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 890
From: Dayton, OH
Originally Posted by 96lt4c4
There is a guy, Pete K, on the Corvette Forum that uses block fill. He fills the bottom 1/2 to 1 inch of the block. Then he grinds away. He said he has ground into the block fill and never had any problems.

Nor any overheating...
The half fill works well. No problems here, and it does act to strengthen the cylinders and mains as well.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 06:48 PM
  #8  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
I was fortunate enough to have a shop who specializes in LSx/LTx strokers and was no problem for them to clearance my 396.
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 09:01 AM
  #9  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
even a bit of core shift in the production can change things significantly from block to block though...
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 09:11 AM
  #10  
chrism400's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 890
From: Dayton, OH
Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
even a bit of core shift in the production can change things significantly from block to block though...
I was pretty careful when I did mine and after I went through on bore #5,
I got the partner saw out on boost and clearanced the rest in about 10 minutes. The block fill is definitely a viable option and nobody should be scared at all about using it. It does add stability to the block and is worth some hp. I have a 13 to 1 solid roller "street" motor that has had absolutely no heating problems whatsoever. Oil temps will be higher but an aftermarket splayed pan is all you need to help with that. Some people do get lucky though and clearance fine. My block though was not, and it wasn't because I wasn't being "careful," there was some definite shift or whatever going on.
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 02:30 PM
  #11  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
that concrete will saturate overtime and eventually leak.....ask me how I know...


concrete is jive stuff man...nobody does that stuff anymore.....go o-ring the block when you fill it with some fifty cent concrete you pay $80 for
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #12  
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,935
From: Mobile, Ala..USA
ARP makes a 1/2 head rod bolt so you dont have to take out NEAR as much material to let it swing.

My block is 1/2 grouted and yes the coolant will work its way under it after a while, pull the plug out where the knock sensor goes after a while and coolant will drip out.


David
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 03:42 PM
  #13  
The Engineer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,388
From: Moore Oklahoma
Chad Golen is the "master" of building 396 LT strokers! I couldn't be happier with my Golen 396!

WD

Old Oct 24, 2007 | 03:08 AM
  #14  
Z28SORR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,768
From: Friendswood, TX, USA
Originally Posted by mdacton
no aftermarket LT blocks.

I don't like grinding to do a 396.......it is so easy to hit water its not funny. I don't see any advantage of a 396 over a 383 anyway.......The 383 is even tight.

Doing them on a CNC I know people that have hit water...so I think most people do them by hand.....Mine I even milled the head bolt down slightly so I would not have to grind too much and I tried to get around .050 on each one
A....how about 13ci. and more torque??
Interesting because I've just desided to go with the 396 over the 383 because I have been assured that the parts exist "today" that require very little clearencing. And do not require the small base circle cam.
Mine I even milled the head bolt down slightly
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 04:12 AM
  #15  
AmericanMuscle33's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 378
From: Ellensburg, WA
Just thought I'd share my limited experience:

I had a very old, well qualified shop do all the machining for my 396.
-'94 block
-.030 over
-3.875in stroke
-Ended up using 6inch Eagle H-beam Rods (cleanancing done to rod bolts)
-LT4 Hotcam (not small base-circle)
-no block filler

They did all the clearancing by hand, and due to what else I was having done at the shop...didn't really charge me for it.

As far as "couldn't you have done a 383 instead"...yep, I guess I could have. But I chose a 396 and could not be happier with it. It's a lil' different, and in my case didn't cost me much more...and I sorta "fell into" the callies crank I'm using for next to nothing.

However, if you haven't purchased any parts, the added risks/complication of a 396 probably isn't worth it to many people.

Just my .02
-Andrew
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pimpss96
LT1 Based Engine Tech
4
Feb 12, 2015 01:28 PM
Hot Rod Hawk
Midwest
4
Aug 30, 2002 10:12 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 PM.