LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

355 vs. 383

Old Dec 31, 2005 | 03:44 PM
  #1  
84zed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 88
From: Miss.Ont.Canada
355 vs. 383

If your budget was severely limited would a 383 with stock heads and cam
out run a 350 with LT4 heads cam and intake?
Old Dec 31, 2005 | 03:46 PM
  #2  
bdc95ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,220
From: houston, texas
Re: 355 vs. 383

nope, depends on the driver & a lot of things..
-b
Old Dec 31, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #3  
blackz97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 329
Re: 355 vs. 383

Well if your talking about a 383 bottom end with stock LT1 heads and cam VS a stock displacement LT4 heads/cam combo then I would have to go with the LT4 setup. This is because the stock LT1 heads and cam dont move enough air to take advantage of the 383 bottom end and would actually be a bad bottle neck. LT4 350 will spank a 383 with untouched LT1 heads and stock cam.

Steve
Old Dec 31, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #4  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: 355 vs. 383

Look beyond the LT4 parts they are OK but there are A LOT of ways to make MORE POWER FOR LESS MONEY.

Given the exact two options you layed out for yourself I would call both mistakes.
Old Dec 31, 2005 | 05:18 PM
  #5  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: 355 vs. 383

Do you have to rebuild the bottom end?
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #6  
84zed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 88
From: Miss.Ont.Canada
Re: 355 vs. 383

I am trying to chase down a problem that could be anything from a bad opti to a burned piston.Just figuring out my options for the worst case.I know alot
of people don`t seem to like the" hot cam" set up,but it seems like a good deal,and the car has to pass emissions.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #7  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: 355 vs. 383

Even if you want the HOT cam that does not mean go with the LT4 heads you would be better off with ported LT1s and save money.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 12:29 PM
  #8  
RicocheT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 360
From: Montpelier, VA USA
Re: 355 vs. 383

if you have to, go the 383 route, yes the stock stuff will be a bottle neck, but you can save up and do the top end later on when you have the money to do it.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 01:14 PM
  #9  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: 355 vs. 383

I would agree there if you have to repair the bottomend then I would do a stroker even if the stock heads have to go on it. As a modification alone though I would never suggest such a thing, matter of fact I am actually looking to go all out on heads and put them on a stock bottom with a matching cam and then later build a stroker to put under those heads, will have to buy another cam at that time but I know that going in.
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 01:16 PM
  #10  
clemsb4c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 66
From: lexington KY
Re: 355 vs. 383

I would talk to loyd Elliot I'm sure he could build you somthing to pass emissions that would spank the LT4 setup for the same price.
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 09:12 AM
  #11  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
Re: 355 vs. 383

With the stock induction (heads, and cam) and compression the same the 383 compared to a 350 with the same top would make a big flat torque curve that peaked sooner and made about 3 to 5 percent more peak HP.
Open the heads and valvetiming up to match and the sky is the limit.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM
cristian1311
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Sep 12, 2015 08:16 PM
95craz28
Fuel and Ignition
11
Sep 12, 2015 07:47 AM
smoknta
Cars For Sale
1
Aug 27, 2015 05:07 PM
alphaauto
Cars For Sale
0
Jul 26, 2015 04:40 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 PM.