LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

1993 Z28 - Drawbacks to CAI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2007, 12:02 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jwbeaumont's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12
1993 Z28 - Drawbacks to CAI?

Thinking about putting a CAI on my stock 93 Z.

What are possible drawbacks, longevity issues, or problems that may be associated?

I have heard the Moroso is the easiest.

What do y'all recommend?
jwbeaumont is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 04:27 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
87lt1rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
i do not think there is a down side. after all, there is a reason why 99 percent of people on here have a CAI setup of some sort. moroso, k&n, lingenfelter and are all good products that i have seen.
87lt1rx7 is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 07:43 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
nicks2ndZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 103
the only drawback i could think of would be an installer error like over oiling the filter element during cleaning(can screw up MAF if oil gets on element) or forgetting to hook up a sensor(IAT for instance)...other than something like that from just a rushed install i agree with 87lt1 there really isn't a reason not to do it....they would come from the factory that way because the motor is more efficient and gets better gas mileage, but they use a stock restrictive airbox to make the engine quieter which is what the average consumer wants...its kind of like the case with transmissions where the consumer wants a nice soft shift they don't feel, but that means more time in the clutches which equates to shorter clutch life and quicker transmission rebuilds....but thats what the customer thinks it wants so thats what the car company gives them

and i didn't even catch originally that you have a 93 so you have no maf even more reason to do it
nicks2ndZ is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 09:36 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
2000GTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 12,312
Don't see any reason against it, it is a pretty simple mod to do. I also have the Moroso and it is a good intake, as are several of the other name brand intakes on the market.
2000GTP is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 09:43 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Ironxcross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 459
the only downside is buying it.
Ironxcross is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 01:44 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Bud M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 2,915
I like the Lingenfelter because they have one that's 93 specific, not with a spacer and extra clamps like the K&N. The price is decent too.
Only downside is filter maintenance is more of a chore that the stocker. You can replace the splash panel to make it easier, the replacement splash panels have a hatch cut into them that makes filter access much easier.
Bud M is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 07:01 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Fastbird93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Waynesboro, PA
Posts: 4,827
Biggest downside will be the realization that your car gains power with mods, and you'll do more and more.
Fastbird93 is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 07:07 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
oneclean97z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: North Houston, TX
Posts: 301
Originally Posted by Fastbird93
Biggest downside will be the realization that your car gains power with mods, and you'll do more and more.
amen brother
oneclean97z is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 07:12 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
neil350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 2,665
Zero down sides, just make it easier on your self and get one for a 93 and save your self the trouble. Install is pretty easy as well.
neil350 is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 07:14 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
reamo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,706
downside - might be a little noisier?
reamo04 is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 08:07 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
exgmguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Utica, MI
Posts: 291
The Moroso fits 93's as well. The directions said to "cut to fit" for later mass air cars.
exgmguy is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 08:16 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
green.Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 85
Here's a downside: It is more of a pain to remove to clean and oil than the stock setup, at least with the K&N system. With stock, you just loosen the hose clamp and pull out the airbox assy from the top. With the K&N FIPK setup, you have to remove it from the bottom. First remove the stock plastic panel underneath, then you have to try to access the hose clamp inside (sometimes hard to access). Not a huge deal, but worth mentioning.
green.Z is offline  
Old 05-22-2007, 08:22 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
bombebomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,856
No downsides really, harder to "change" even though your not really changing the filter, or atlest the k&N one.
bombebomb is offline  
Old 05-23-2007, 11:16 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jwbeaumont's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12
Which one is easiest to install?

Which one is easiest to install? I get impatient with things like this real fast when they don't go together as-advertised.

I have heard the Moroso is the easiest. Is that true?
jwbeaumont is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
camy 1993
New Member Introduction
2
02-01-2015 07:16 PM
CobraEatr
LT1 Based Engine Tech
33
07-24-2004 11:37 AM
CobraEatr
Car Audio and Electronics
3
07-23-2002 06:32 PM
CobraEatr
Car Audio and Electronics
3
07-22-2002 09:49 AM
Absolute Z28
Car Audio and Electronics
13
07-19-2002 02:21 PM



Quick Reply: 1993 Z28 - Drawbacks to CAI?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM.