1993 hp and tq?
Re: 1993 hp and tq?
Originally Posted by 89305rs
and what were the differences?
if the f-body was rated the same as the almighty Vette.
Re: 1993 hp and tq?
lol 50hp would put it 25hp higher than the actual lt1 engine was rated, making it 325.
Most dynos put a stock lt1 around 250-255 rwhp which puts it right at the 300hp factory rating. Have yet to see an LT1 make the ~276rwhp it would take to put it at 50hp underrated. If you're saying 50 hp underrated from the actual 300 hp factory rating, you've got to be smoking some good stuff if you think an LT1 will make ~295rwhp stock.
Most dynos put a stock lt1 around 250-255 rwhp which puts it right at the 300hp factory rating. Have yet to see an LT1 make the ~276rwhp it would take to put it at 50hp underrated. If you're saying 50 hp underrated from the actual 300 hp factory rating, you've got to be smoking some good stuff if you think an LT1 will make ~295rwhp stock.
Last edited by BirchMan98z; Feb 9, 2005 at 08:54 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 30, 2015 04:20 PM
z28cam1993
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
14
Sep 9, 2015 04:08 AM



