LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

16X8 tire size question?

Old Nov 13, 2003 | 11:39 AM
  #16  
zoso1959's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 187
From: ill
Re: Re: Re: Re: winter driving

Originally posted by ShelbyZ28
The second number in the tire size (the side wall height or 50 in this case) is a percentage of the first (the total width 225 in this case). 50% of 245 is bigger than 50% of 225 so the 225/50/16 has a smaller diameter than the 245/50/16 thus it spins faster causing the speedo to be off 3.1%. So getting a 225/55/16 you have 55% of 225 instead of 50% so the diameter is bigger. Its still not exactly the same as 50% of 245 but its close enough to not be noticable. This website will show you how much different tire sizes will cause the speedo to be off:

http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html


Bryan
THANKS
so if it was 45 or 50 percet of the sidewall of a 245 tire
then the spedo wouldn't change.
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 11:41 AM
  #17  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,098
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: winter driving

Originally posted by zoso1959

......the firestone bliztrac tire mounted & balance $118.00 each.....

Would that be the Bridgestone Blizzak?

For a snow tire application, a narrower tire often provides better traction in the snow. Is the edge lugs that develop most of the traction, not the tread. Too wide a tread just keeps the tire from sinking into the snow, where the side lugs can grip.

I ran a set of 225/55-16 Blizzaks on a set set of takeoff Z28 salad shooters for one winter - all four wheels. Looked like crap, but they were definitely wayyyy better in the snow than the 245/50-15 GS-C's. But on dry pavement, they had little traction. I'd get left at the lights spinning, getting pulled by mom 'n pop Buicks.....
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 11:46 AM
  #18  
zoso1959's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 187
From: ill
Re: Re: winter driving

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Injuneer
[B]Would that be the Bridgestone Blizzak?

YEAH your right. sorry for the mis-spelling
long week
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 11:53 AM
  #19  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,098
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: winter driving

Originally posted by zoso1959
THANKS
so if it was 45 or 50 percet of the sidewall of a 245 tire
then the spedo wouldn't change.
No....

You need to keep the outside diameter of the tire exactly the same as the stock 245/50-16. And that is about 25.65". You can use a 275/40-17, a 315/35-17 or a 285/35-18..... they are also very close to 25.65" outside diameter. And you can use a 225/55-16, that is only a few hundreths of an inch larger than stock.

If you use any other sizes, you need to check the outside diameter.

225/45-16 = ~24.86"

255/50-16 = ~26.04"

You can get the actual outside tire diameter for the specific brand and tire size you are looking at off a site like Tire Rack. Or you can calculate it, using a formula we can give you, or using an online tire calculator.
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 12:08 PM
  #20  
ShelbyZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 411
From: Lafayette, Indiana
Re: Re: winter driving

Originally posted by Injuneer
Would that be the Bridgestone Blizzak?

For a snow tire application, a narrower tire often provides better traction in the snow. Is the edge lugs that develop most of the traction, not the tread. Too wide a tread just keeps the tire from sinking into the snow, where the side lugs can grip.

I ran a set of 225/55-16 Blizzaks on a set set of takeoff Z28 salad shooters for one winter - all four wheels. Looked like crap, but they were definitely wayyyy better in the snow than the 245/50-15 GS-C's. But on dry pavement, they had little traction. I'd get left at the lights spinning, getting pulled by mom 'n pop Buicks.....
Those are the tires I got. I'm dreading seeing how they will look . But if they are good in the snow I'll deal, thats the sacrifice I have to make I guess. That sucks they have poor traction but its only 3 months out of the year.
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 12:13 PM
  #21  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,098
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Even the GS-C's had no traction on a 0degF day, when the rubber is cold, the asphalt is cold and the engine is developing 17% more power than it is on a 80degF day
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 12:16 PM
  #22  
ShelbyZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 411
From: Lafayette, Indiana
HAHA true. All those factors together make for horrible traction
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 01:22 PM
  #23  
llafro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 408
From: West Coast
Snow? What's that? It's 70 degrees and sunny today. Sorry. Couldn't resist.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
Jul 30, 2017 11:46 AM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Feb 1, 2015 08:26 AM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Jan 25, 2015 08:06 AM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Jan 18, 2015 08:05 AM
Hurin
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
4
Dec 13, 2014 07:38 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.