LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

11.9:1 compression too high?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2004, 02:33 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
rage366's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 780
11.9:1 compression too high?

that's the compression i was running on my 355 lt1 motor.
location: sea level.
gas: 93 octane
stock ported aluminum heads and flat stop pistons.
cam goes up to 6500rpm.

well, the piston rings didnt set in, so the motor has to be torn down to replace them. since that'll be done, should i lower my compression?

i've heard stories on here about how with the right parts and tuning, you can achieve 13:1 compression. well, i'm pretty sure that i couldnt afford to pay some hot-shot tuner to do this, and i'm also sure that i dont know what the "right" parts means (pretty vague term to me).

so, what should i lower my compression to to prevent detonation.


shokor.
rage366 is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 02:49 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
BlueCamaroZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 267
My flat top Speed Pro forged pistons compression ratio is in excess of 11:1 with stock ported heads and ZZ9 cam.

The 355 is now setting in my 1993 YJ wrangler Jeep. I am at sea level too and running 93 octane gas.

It's a badass Jeep with that LT1.
BlueCamaroZ28 is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 02:55 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
dnz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 771
you can go much higher than 13.0cr you dont have to get a hot shot tuner just go get 8cc dome pistions. should get you at or a little higher then 13.0 depending on deck height, bore size etc.
dnz28 is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 03:01 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Grease's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, OHIO
Posts: 870
I've had 11.9:1 compression on the stock bottom end for a long time without any problems. I have a cam that goes all the way to 6900rpm and use 93 octane, but I'm not at sea level. There are people that've run higher than that on the street so it is possible but not always recommendable.
Grease is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 03:05 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
442olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 102
dynamic compression

The thing you should be looking at more so than the static compression ratio is your dynamic compression ratio. If your came closes the intake late enough it may just bleed off more compression than you think. Heres a link to my spreadsheet engine build sheet I can't remember what version I have of it up, but you can enter all your data at the top of the page in yellow. I think there is a place for intake valve close in deg @.005". Enter all the data and it will spit out the static and dynamic compression ratio at the bottom.

A safe dynamic ratio is around 7.5:1. With my current cam I'll be makeing static compression of 12.5 but a dynamic of 7.6. The factory LT4 non-hot cam has a late intake closeing event. At least mine does. Measured it to be 81 deg.

Also make sure your quench height is in a good range .035 to .040 quench should help as well.
442olds is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 03:28 PM
  #6  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Re: dynamic compression

Originally posted by 442olds
The thing you should be looking at more so than the static compression ratio is your dynamic compression ratio. If your came closes the intake late enough it may just bleed off more compression than you think. Heres a link to my spreadsheet engine build sheet I can't remember what version I have of it up, but you can enter all your data at the top of the page in yellow. I think there is a place for intake valve close in deg @.005". Enter all the data and it will spit out the static and dynamic compression ratio at the bottom.

A safe dynamic ratio is around 7.5:1. With my current cam I'll be makeing static compression of 12.5 but a dynamic of 7.6. The factory LT4 non-hot cam has a late intake closeing event. At least mine does. Measured it to be 81 deg.

Also make sure your quench height is in a good range .035 to .040 quench should help as well.
That's a good post but I think that with a reverse cooled aluminum head motor with EFI like the LT1 you can go a bit higher on the DCR. 8:1 or even as high as 8.5:1 is feasible with a carefully built well tuned motor, at least IMHO. Mine is ~6.5:1 but it's a blower car.

Rich Krause
rskrause is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 05:58 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
442olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 102
I said it was "safe" I didn't say it was the limit.

The dcr in my vette is pushing the limits of a cast iron headed big block at 8.9, or something like that can't remember the number off hand.
442olds is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 06:09 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
95z6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Elkins Park, PA
Posts: 92
Hey guys , i'm planning a pretty agressive heads and cam swap soon. Which compression/cc size should i run. It will be with a stock bottom end
95z6spd is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 06:10 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
95z6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Elkins Park, PA
Posts: 92
That will be with 93 octane gas and good tune by Rapid Motorsports
95z6spd is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 07:07 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
"White Knight"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,544
Just don't let her get lean
"White Knight" is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 07:16 PM
  #11  
Moderator
 
rskrause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 10,745
Originally posted by 95z6spd
Hey guys , i'm planning a pretty agressive heads and cam swap soon. Which compression/cc size should i run. It will be with a stock bottom end
The cam specs are needed to answer this question in all but the most general way.

Rich Krause
rskrause is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikeWhitener
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
08-02-2015 06:17 PM
fundone2000-RZ
Pacific
0
07-21-2015 07:21 AM
SpeedJunkee
Parts For Sale
0
07-19-2015 09:06 PM
13qtr
LT1 Based Engine Tech
23
07-19-2015 05:30 PM
mrwz28
Cars For Sale
0
07-08-2015 09:11 PM



Quick Reply: 11.9:1 compression too high?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 AM.