LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

10 second street car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #76  
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,935
From: Mobile, Ala..USA
Originally Posted by Nostang 96z
10.9's NA would not be that hard if you didn't mind breaking a lot or fixing your car often...and also what you want to put up with as far as lack of creature comfort. You could get a nice camaro rolling chassis for ~$2000. Gut the car of everything to get a raceweight of around 2900 (do not put a cage or other safety equiptment...no heat, no radio, etc) Buy a 355-383LT1 shortblock for around $2000, a matched set of heads, cam and intake for $2500. A built 4L60e with a combo matched converter $1600. Figure a tune into it for $500. Some misc stuff (tires wheels suspension) $2000 and you should be in the 10's if you picked the right parts. There are gutted bolt on Lt1 cars running 11.8-11.9s@113-114 so anything that could net you around 100 more rwhp and you should be at 10.8 or 10.9's @ 121-123 depending on the weather. The stock rear will probably go quickly but for a total of less than $11k you could have a 10 sec NA LT1 car that would be pretty streetable but not have any creature comforts. Still costs money to go fast. You could do the above in the LS1 on the stock shortblock by going cam only so the only big difference between LS1 (100lbs lighter) and LT1 is you need would head and intake on an Lt1 car.
If you think getting a 4th gen to 2900lbs WITHOUT driver is easy or free, think again...a 2900lb RACEWEIGHT....is DAMN expensive, VERY few have achieved that. Even with a stock 10 bolt.

Aerospace brakes
Chromemoly or aluminum EVERYTHING!
Kirkey seat (ONE)


A shortblock for $2000? A nice stock rebuild with forged pistons costs almost that.

$1600 for a 4L60E AND converter? Better buy two, one in the car and one being rebuilt.

I gotta tell ya, guys that have done it or VERY close to the 10's all motor will tell ya...you may build a one hit wonder for that money, but a sreetcar that can drive around, run in the high 10's low 11's is HARD to do.

David
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 11:16 AM
  #77  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Originally Posted by 1racerdude






AD CATEGORY :: Drag Racing Cars :: Sportsman
Ad #985666 Posted:2007-10-03 09:12:36
This ad expires in 69 days.
Recommend AdContact SellerAdd To Favorites
1987 Trans Am GTA S/ST
434ci sb Motown block w/brodix alum heads and intake
Low 10�s at 130 in quarter, mid 6�s at 108 in eighth
750 alcohol carb w/Rupert belt drive system
8 pt. roll bar
5 point camlock harness
Auto meter silver face gauges
9 inch ford w/430 gears and moser axles and detroit locker
Ladder bars w/AVO adjustable coilovers
4 wheel disc brakes
16x32 goodyear slicks
Powder coated centerlines
MSD 7AL-2 ignition
Cheetah shifter w/biondo electric shift solenoid
5 gallon fuel cell in rear, braided line up and return to tank
Powerglide w/TCI brake
ATI 8 inch 5500 convertor
6inch hinged fiberglass cowl hood
Mega 450 delay box
Hooker super comp coated headers
Borla exhaust system
Coil over front struts and tubular lower a-arms
Will separate. Have title and is fully streetable
$26000 tk or $18000 rolling

This item is USED

Trades ACCEPTED: nice chevy stocker or 66-67 nova chassis car

Item Location: RIDGETOP, TN Get Directions
Send Message To Seller


Look at what this has and his times

Not a person posting has a big tire ,434CID all aluminum engine car but ya all say it's easy and cheapr than $30,000 BS been there


The ones that say it's easy have never done it.They just have BIG ideas of what is done and listen to and take what is said by other people say, as to what is done for a car to be that fast as (IE "just running a 50 shot") it is as gospel. Truth may be that whoever said that may be running a 300 shot.

Last edited by 1racerdude; Oct 22, 2007 at 11:22 AM.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 11:17 AM
  #78  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Originally Posted by Nostang 96z
10.9's NA would not be that hard if you didn't mind breaking a lot or fixing your car often...and also what you want to put up with as far as lack of creature comfort. You could get a nice camaro rolling chassis for ~$2000. Gut the car of everything to get a raceweight of around 2900 (do not put a cage or other safety equiptment...no heat, no radio, etc) Buy a 355-383LT1 shortblock for around $2000, a matched set of heads, cam and intake for $2500. A built 4L60e with a combo matched converter $1600. Figure a tune into it for $500. Some misc stuff (tires wheels suspension) $2000 and you should be in the 10's if you picked the right parts. There are gutted bolt on Lt1 cars running 11.8-11.9s@113-114 so anything that could net you around 100 more rwhp and you should be at 10.8 or 10.9's @ 121-123 depending on the weather. The stock rear will probably go quickly but for a total of less than $11k you could have a 10 sec NA LT1 car that would be pretty streetable but not have any creature comforts. Still costs money to go fast. You could do the above in the LS1 on the stock shortblock by going cam only so the only big difference between LS1 (100lbs lighter) and LT1 is you need would head and intake on an Lt1 car.
Refer to the above post. Ya must have overlooked it.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 11:58 AM
  #79  
ABA383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,903
From: Littlestown, PA
Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
If you think getting a 4th gen to 2900lbs WITHOUT driver is easy or free, think again...a 2900lb RACEWEIGHT....is DAMN expensive, VERY few have achieved that. Even with a stock 10 bolt.

Aerospace brakes
Chromemoly or aluminum EVERYTHING!
Kirkey seat (ONE)


A shortblock for $2000? A nice stock rebuild with forged pistons costs almost that.

$1600 for a 4L60E AND converter? Better buy two, one in the car and one being rebuilt.

I gotta tell ya, guys that have done it or VERY close to the 10's all motor will tell ya...you may build a one hit wonder for that money, but a sreetcar that can drive around, run in the high 10's low 11's is HARD to do.

David
...and like it was said before, if it were that easy everyone would do it...Hell, even low 11 second street cars are a novelty around here...It adds up very fast...So fast that, for the sake of my marriage, I stopped adding...I am still trying to do more with less, but less is getting to be a lot less frequent now...

--Alan
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #80  
_94Lt1_'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 91
From: Oklahoma
8.83 is my best time. On slicks of course. About 60K and 2.5 years.

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/362267


Sign my guestbook !
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 12:41 PM
  #81  
Nostang 96z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 458
From: Newark, DE.
I guess what I was saying above is that if you gut the hell out of your car to a lightweight tin can and do not replace anything you could do it for cheaply but you wouldn't do it for long without breaking something. It still costs you to go fast and there is no way of getting around that.

I know of a few bolt on LT1 cars with hardly any money in them (no tubular K-members,etc and very little purchased parts--got the car down to 3200lbs with a 250lb driver with no money in aftermarket parts) running 12.0's@113mph in decent weather and they will probably go 11.8's in great weather this fall. The lightweight cars can run very good numbers a lot more easily than a car that weighs 400 lbs more and you will break less parts.

Aba383 (Alan)--you could easily hit 10's with your combo with a 400lb weight reduction and good weather. But like many of us we would rather have more of a streetable car than run the number at the track.

I built my car to run high 9's and still be streetable so I went the bottle baby route. I have never had to spray anyone on the street that was not a planned type run so running mid 11's has been good enough around these parts as far as a cruiser is concerned.

Besides if you have a car that runs high 10's NA on the street I can guarantee you won't that kind of number on the "street" and might get whooped by a high 11 sec car that does hook.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 12:55 PM
  #82  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Yes to many of these posts. And my 10.02 second full weight street car is now down because even the best quality parts can break. Cars that run this quick are high cost/high mantainence. There is a partial way around it - light weight and a big block. But the only way to do this cheap does not produce a "street car". My bracket car runs high eights and gets up to 100 passes per year with very little maintainence. But it weighs 2100lbs (with driver) and has a big block. You could buy it tomorrow for $20,000.You could go a lot faster with a bigger big block and still keep the reliability. But it is a race car.

Making a reliable 10 second ride out of a street car is very expensive, no way around it. The cheapest way is N2O, but that simply isn't as cheap as it looks until you actually go to build it.

Rich
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 04:30 PM
  #83  
dangalla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,092
From: lakeville, pa
Originally Posted by Nostang 96z
I guess what I was saying above is that if you gut the hell out of your car to a lightweight tin can and do not replace anything you could do it for cheaply but you wouldn't do it for long without breaking something. It still costs you to go fast and there is no way of getting around that.
and you would still consider that a street car

Originally Posted by rskrause
Cars that run this quick are high cost/high mantainence. There is a partial way around it - light weight and a big block. But the only way to do this cheap does not produce a "street car".

Making a reliable 10 second ride out of a street car is very expensive, no way around it. The cheapest way is N2O, but that simply isn't as cheap as it looks until you actually go to build it.

Rich
perfect, as far as i am concerned /thread
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #84  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
I'm still a dreamer when it comes to a 10 second street car. But for me, it takes nitrous. If you count the cost of the car, 23k new, add the trial and error, plus the cost of what works, plus shop time for most of it but not all, I'm at 40k. Even with that and some more work to barely crack the 10s, I'll still have to replace the trans, rearend, and install a bar to be legal at the track. That's another 5k easy and I'll still have a stock shortblock. The good news is, the car is still in nice shape (30k) with air, drives almost like stock and could pass emissions if I had to. Not required anymore.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 05:49 PM
  #85  
Nostang 96z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 458
From: Newark, DE.
Originally Posted by dangalla
and you would still consider that a street car

Nope, I would not but a lot of people do.

The only creature comforts I am missing is my AC, ABS, and power steering. I miss the AC but the car is a lot easier to work on now. I love cars that are fast as hell that still retain all of the factory bells and whistles.
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 08:49 AM
  #86  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Nostang 96z
I love cars that are fast as hell that still retain all of the factory bells and whistles.
That is exactly why a new ZO6 is the deal of the day.
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 09:27 AM
  #87  
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,935
From: Mobile, Ala..USA
You can look at it like this to have a 10 second normally aspirated streetcar.....

Take the *** whippin up front, save up and pay for all the good stuff the first time you build it, spend the time to do it right and enjoy the car when it is done. It may take you 3 times longer to do it right the first time, but it's worth it.


OR



Strip your car, shortcut it every chance you get, buy half assed junk, half azz build it. Have a one hit wonder(10.99999 ONE time if you are VERY lucky) Have it break every 2 weeks, and pay 3 times as much money than if you had built it right the first time and suffer with working on it all the time.


I prefer the first option.


David
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 08:52 PM
  #88  
chief455's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 550
From: Winsted, CT 06098
I'm 45 years old. Playing with fast cars for 30 of them. Until the past decade or so, cars faster than 12s were stripped down cars with high compression = race fuel - not comfy for long rides.
We've evolved tremendously to now, but an old rule of thumb was "once you're into 10's it's about $10,000 a tenth"
Meaning improving a stock car is inexpensive with great reward, building a "bolt on" car to perform well takes equal research and money, building a "street/strp" car into the low 11's is an expensive task best handled by experienced mechanics - and anything quicker is just plain going to cost big bucks, and makes "street car" a blurry statement.
The low hanging fruit is a bolt on car.
Put a well built motor and a lightened body within those bolt on's and you have about the most cost effective fun machine.
Power adders are not for a novice and accelerate parts beakage.
So to the original poster: with your M6 LT1 in street comfy form, low 11's will take a good deal of reasearch and money spent on the higher quality parts.
Keep reading and keep thinking.....those are both good things to do.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Louey
Pacific
1
Dec 25, 2014 03:27 AM
Louey
Pacific
0
Dec 8, 2014 08:01 PM
Louey
Pacific
1
Nov 28, 2014 03:46 AM
USAirman93
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
Nov 24, 2014 03:37 PM
Queens94z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
Nov 20, 2014 06:03 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 PM.