1.7"s vs 1.6"s
1.7"s vs 1.6"s
Ok, this is a stock internal motor. Was wondering which would be best. Do I need hardened pushrods for 1.6's? would there be much more of a gain with 1.7's?
Last edited by Inutero; Jan 9, 2005 at 03:21 PM.
Re: 1.7"s vs 1.6"s
If you use a self aligning rocker you do not need hardened pusrods. If you switch to a non-self aligning rocker you need guideplates and hardened pushrods. If you have stock heads you will not gain anything significant from 1.7:1 v. 1.6:1 rockers.
Rich
Rich
Re: 1.7"s vs 1.6"s
Just wanted to be an *** and throw in there that it's not 1.6" and 1.7" (inches), it's a ratio as in 1.6:1 and 1.7:1.
Hardened pushrods have nothing to do with the pushrod ratio, but as stated, whether you use guideplates or not.
Hardened pushrods have nothing to do with the pushrod ratio, but as stated, whether you use guideplates or not.
Re: 1.7"s vs 1.6"s
Originally Posted by SnakeSkinner28
Do you feel smarter now?
Great technical post
Anyway, for stock internals, your best bet is to go with 1.6's as your stock springs probably wouldn't be able to handle the extra lift. Later on, if you switch cams, just get a little higher lift cam instead of the 1.7's.
Re: 1.7"s vs 1.6"s
Originally Posted by 92LT1RS
Great technical post
Anyway, for stock internals, your best bet is to go with 1.6's as your stock springs probably wouldn't be able to handle the extra lift. Later on, if you switch cams, just get a little higher lift cam instead of the 1.7's.
Anyway, for stock internals, your best bet is to go with 1.6's as your stock springs probably wouldn't be able to handle the extra lift. Later on, if you switch cams, just get a little higher lift cam instead of the 1.7's.
Re: 1.7"s vs 1.6"s
Originally Posted by unvc92camarors
since you have a 95, you already have hardened pushrods from the factory

So people say but I wouldnt trust that word of mouth. REAL hardeneed pushrods are only $20.
Re: 1.7"s vs 1.6"s
I picked up a little bit on stock heads going with 1.6 RR's, but I also have all the bolt-ons. I would say do 1.6's if you intend to do all the bolt-on's as a minimum. I think 1.7's might even make a little more HP (just a little). The use of 1.7's on stock heads become prohibitive in most cases.
Re: 1.7"s vs 1.6"s
Simple...
How big of a cam do you plan on running?
If you don't plan on going over the LT-4 Specs try the 1.7's
If you plan on going bigger... Get the 1.6's
There's allot of comments and reviews on the Scorpions... on this site...
But to be honest with you I'd go with the 1.6's NSA just so I can sleep safe at night...
How big of a cam do you plan on running?
If you don't plan on going over the LT-4 Specs try the 1.7's
If you plan on going bigger... Get the 1.6's
There's allot of comments and reviews on the Scorpions... on this site...
But to be honest with you I'd go with the 1.6's NSA just so I can sleep safe at night...
Re: 1.7"s vs 1.6"s
Originally Posted by rskrause
If you have stock heads you will not gain anything significant from 1.7:1 v. 1.6:1 rockers.
Rich
Rich
Re: 1.7"s vs 1.6"s
Originally Posted by turbo_Z
So people say but I wouldnt trust that word of mouth. REAL hardeneed pushrods are only $20.
it's your money in the end, not mine
i'd rather just use my pushrods that i already have, just my personal preference
Re: 1.7"s vs 1.6"s
Originally Posted by SnakeSkinner28
Well i figured it was about as good as his was, and i guess it didnt sink in as you are not following his advice. They are 1:6, not 1.6'. Remember now, its a ratio.
Dan
Re: 1.7"s vs 1.6"s
hey sorry to intrude but i have a comp cam with 510 540 lift and 918 springs could i go with 1.7's and not mess anything up. Also what kind of a lift improvement would i see with 1.7's I was tol with 1.6 my lift would be like 560 570 area.
thanks
thanks


