LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

1.6 RR vs 1.7 RR RWHP gains????

Old Jan 9, 2006 | 07:12 PM
  #1  
Z94SLEEPER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 46
From: Baton Rouge, La.
Lightbulb 1.6 RR vs 1.7 RR RWHP gains????

Can anyone give RWHP gains going from 1.6 RR to 1.7 RR OR
the difference in HP gains going to 1.7's vs. the 1.6's? Please let me know what mods you have as well. I realize the gains will be greater the more "work" has been done to the motor.

I'm wanting to install some RR in the near future and would like to see some results from what you all have seen. Stock, bolt-ons, cam-only, heads, etc.
Also, discuss which ones you have found to be the best to work with as far as changing out, adjustment(s), and durability!

Thanks,
Eric
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #2  
turbo_Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,515
From: Kansas
Re: 1.6 RR vs 1.7 RR RWHP gains????

The 1.7s might give you more power but I have heard there are valvetrain geometry issues with running them. Id stick with the 1.6s or wait till you find a cam just incase you need to run 1.5s.

Nice track times btw... thats bolt-ons only right?
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 07:42 PM
  #3  
Z94SLEEPER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 46
From: Baton Rouge, La.
Smile Re: 1.6 RR vs 1.7 RR RWHP gains????

Thanks and the geometry issue is something I was wondering about as well. Would you say 1.6's for most cam installs and 1.5's only for say the really big cams or solid rollers?

Oh, yes, bolt-ons only. I want to install the upgraded springs and RRs along with suspension work as everything is stock and getting mighty old and loose.
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 09:31 PM
  #4  
sbs's Avatar
sbs
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,154
From: VA
Re: 1.6 RR vs 1.7 RR RWHP gains????

On this car 1.7 worth 14 RWHP over 1.6:

http://www.wku.edu/~nathan.plemons/h..._corvette.html

He also tried 1.8s and lost HP vs the 1.7s, but he didn't bother checking geometry and people were surmising that pushrod length was an issue (he used same pushrods with 1.6/1.7/1.8)

[edit]I should add that his flow sheet indicated that the heads should support the lift with 1.8s.[/edit]

Last edited by sbs; Jan 9, 2006 at 09:34 PM.
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 12:23 PM
  #5  
Z94SLEEPER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 46
From: Baton Rouge, La.
Smile Re: 1.6 RR vs 1.7 RR RWHP gains????

The 14hp gain had help from the cam and especially the heads. I feel I need some 1.6's because of the amount of low backpressure I now have with the hooker longtubes and huge y-pipe. I did gain power and speed however not as much as I had expected to. I only gained 1-1-1/2 mph going to long tubes and 4" y-pipe vs. my manifolds. I believe if I wish to really be able to use and gain the power the Hookers can give me, I must up the RR's and maybe even a cam but at least the RR's.
When I raced before with just manifolds it was like my car would suddenly go into another gear when I reached a certain rpm and take off and now it doesn't.

Anyone else experienced this surge at higher rpms with your stock exhaust system before the header install?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95chwagon
Parts For Sale
5
Oct 16, 2015 12:24 PM
football4life
Cars For Sale
2
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 AM
9t4lt4z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Oct 2, 2015 10:28 AM
colts0455
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
Sep 22, 2015 02:03 PM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM.