LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

1.55 rr?

Old Feb 15, 2009 | 06:44 PM
  #1  
stephenspann27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 239
From: College Station, tx
1.55 rr?

Right now I have a CC304 cam.. and I am running stock rockers and push rods. I would like to make my cam a little "bigger" by going with a higher ratio rocker arm. I have LT-4 valve springs. I think the last time I asked I was told I would get spring binding if I ran a 1.6 rocker. I really hate to change the springs out.. does anyone know if I could get away with a 1.55 ratio rocker?
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 06:52 PM
  #2  
Air-Adam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 73
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
The actual lift difference would only be about 2%... not worth it IMO. You won't notice the difference, and likely, neither would the dyno (Assuming you already have a 1.5 roller rocker, not the stock stamped stuff).

Probably not a good idea to get that close to the spring bind height anyway... should always leave some room for error.
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 06:54 PM
  #3  
stephenspann27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 239
From: College Station, tx
ohh..

I thought stock rockers were 1.5 I do have stock stamped rockers.. and plan to upgrade to RR.. I was hoping to gain a little more lift too.. but I've been told 1.6 it too big for my springs..
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 07:10 PM
  #4  
Stl94LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,083
From: O'Fallon, MO
Change your springs and get 1.6 RR's. I've never seen a 1.55 rocker, Comp makes a 1.52.
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 07:14 PM
  #5  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Comp will special order 1.55's in the Pro-Magnums. I run a set on my exhaust side.
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 07:15 PM
  #6  
stephenspann27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 239
From: College Station, tx
Originally Posted by Injuneer
Comp will special order 1.55's in the Pro-Magnums. I run a set on my exhaust side.
Sweet.. I'll do that.. if someone can assure me my springs won't bottom out..
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 09:39 AM
  #7  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
what valve springs are you running? The CC304 with 1.6 rockers only has .533/.544" lift. The 1.6s also increase the time (aka duration) that the valves are open making it act like a slightly longer duration cam. The cost to special order a set of 1.55s (which would only give .517/.527" lift) seems like a waste to me. That is unless you are running a little more advanced combo like Fred
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #8  
stephenspann27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 239
From: College Station, tx
I have LT-4 valve springs..
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #9  
Stl94LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,083
From: O'Fallon, MO
Again, change the springs and get the 1.6 rockers. It'll give you a nice little boost in HP. The LT4 springs are really not that good for any cammed LT1.
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 02:47 PM
  #10  
stephenspann27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 239
From: College Station, tx
I really dread changing the springs with the heads on the car. Would I pick up my HP by going to a 1.6RR? Enough to justify the head ache?
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 02:54 PM
  #11  
Stl94LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,083
From: O'Fallon, MO
Yes, you will pick up some HP by upgrading to the 1.6 RR's. You may even pick up HP from the spring change, by better controlling your valvetrain.
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #12  
978Racing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 85
Originally Posted by Stl94LT1
Again, change the springs and get the 1.6 rockers. It'll give you a nice little boost in HP. The LT4 springs are really not that good for any cammed LT1.
I agree with you. The 1.6 and better springs is the smart way to go. I currently have the cc305 cam, with cc beehive springs. If I change to 1.6 RR ,how will that effect midrange power??

Thanks
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #13  
stephenspann27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 239
From: College Station, tx
yea LT-4 springs will only go to .525 :-(
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #14  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
Just do it right: begin with checking the cam card for your cam and see what spring pressures and heights are recommended for the cam with 1.6RRs. Should be at least a dual spring. Suggest going with non-self adjusting RRs with the guide plates and hardened pushrods----check your geometry to ensure the correct PR length. SB std length, but better to make sure.

If you bring each cyl to TDC you should be able to change out your springs without dropping the valve into the cylinder. Be sure to get the proper spring compresser for the job. For that matter, be sure to check out all recommendations on this board regarding the RRs, Springs, PRs, Guide Plates, etc.

With the additional lift and a bit more duration, along with the proper combination of parts you should get the maximum power out of your cam along with a solid, well-controlled valve train. JMHO
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 04:51 PM
  #15  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
LT4 springs? You'll gain power by getting a decent spring in there...

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 PM.