LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Thinking about buying a LS1 SS.......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 12:47 PM
  #16  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Originally Posted by Hawk
Think thats about it, looking for a low 12 second car I think I can do that with the mods above and throwing on some ET streets. I'm estimating 25k for all this including the car, doing all the work myself.

at low 12s.

My Procharged Vette made 514rwhp through a 2.5" exhaust and the stock blower pulley with the stock bottom end through a stock 4L60E w/ unlocked converter.. 2400 stall, 3.73 gears, 18" BFG Drag Radials, etc.

It ran 11.1x @ 127 best.

Mike
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 01:01 PM
  #17  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Let me edit that a little bit for you

Originally Posted by JakeRobb

Also, if you're capping yourself at 25k and buying all new parts, you'll never put together all of the parts you listed. 30k would be more realistic:
$12,000 for the car
$5000 for the supercharger kit
Less than $1500 for the heads (assembled) and a matching cam - 317 heads are around $300 used. A cam is $399 and the hardware is another $600.
$2500 for the 12-bolt
$550 for the Ram Powergrip HD w/o flywheel
$1500 for the tranny rebuild and shifter
$400 for Drag Radials. Who needs wheels? Some nice Nittos, BFG Drag Radials, or M/T ET Street Drag Radials will work perfectly.
$1000 for the exhaust
$300 for basic bolt-ons (lid, pulleys)
$500 for a dyno tune
Just saved him a few thousand
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 01:29 PM
  #18  
Hawk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,319
From: Jackson, NJ, USA
haha, I know low 12's is easy with a blower. I was just trying to say that I want to run low boost and not blow the stock internal motor up, I'm not looking for max power on stock internals here. I looking for reliable, streetable, and perferably without doing engine internals like a cam or even heads if I can get away with it.

Thats why I wanted a blower, I thought I could just use moderate amount of boost with stock internals and get low 12's easy. I'm sure I can break into 11's all day if I push it, but I would think on stock internals it might not be the best idea if I don't want to kill the engine. I just know from personnel experience, with nitrous, on 100 shots the engine can only take so much especially being an older car. I do plan on eventually doing a forged buildup one day(maybe getting a shop to do a whole crate engine) then putting a blower on that.

I jsut ahve to think about things, I mean, heck, for 25k I could just go out and buy a 2003 cobra. But I like buying the SS idea because I could get the car for 14k, and just mod it as I have money and enjoy doing that as time progresses. Buying the cobra would be fun, but it's not like I have to do anything to it at all. I like tinkering around.
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 02:05 PM
  #19  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Kraest
Let me edit that a little bit for you

Just saved him a few thousand
Ah, I didn't know the 317 heads were so affordable. Is that the casting number for the L92?

As for wheels... he said he wanted to go to 315s... Not gonna mount those on the stock 9" wheel.

Also, do you think the Ram Powergrip HD would work well on a heads/cam/blower car running drag radials?
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 04:22 PM
  #20  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Ah, I didn't know the 317 heads were so affordable. Is that the casting number for the L92?

Also, do you think the Ram Powergrip HD would work well on a heads/cam/blower car running drag radials?
Nope. You can't run those anyway on the 3.9" bore motors. They are the LQ9 heads, as I said in a few posts previously

I've had no problems whatsoever with mine. He's talking about running heads to lower the static compression ratio and didn't mention a cam. The Ram Powergrip HD will support over 500rwhp without a problem. It's one of their high-end clutches that Ram produces and is rated at 120% more holding power than stock.
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 04:27 PM
  #21  
dangalla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,092
From: lakeville, pa
Originally Posted by Kraest
Nope. You can't run those anyway on the 3.9" bore motors. They are the LQ9 heads, as I said in a few posts previously
.

https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...4&postcount=21
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 04:36 PM
  #22  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Is that the casting number for the L92?
Originally Posted by Kraest
Nope. You can't run those anyway on the 3.9" bore motors. They are the LQ9 heads, as I said in a few posts previously
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #23  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Kraest
The bore on the block doesn't dictate which heads you can/can't use.
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Is that the casting number for the L92?
Originally Posted by Kraest
You can't run those anyway on the 3.9" bore motors.
I believe this is the specific series of statements that had dangalla ing.
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 04:45 PM
  #24  
dangalla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,092
From: lakeville, pa
Originally Posted by Kraest
Nope. You can't run those anyway on the 3.9" bore motors. They are the LQ9 heads, as I said in a few posts previously
.
Originally Posted by Kraest
The 317 casting heads (LQ9) fit perfectly fine on an LS1. They are nearly identical castings to the LS6 heads, but the combustion chamber is bigger to allow lower compression.
im just confused
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #25  
Me>you's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 174
From: archbald, PA
You don't want to run L92's on an LS1...

6.0, 317 casting LQ9 heads from the trucks are what you want...

The L92 heads are huge runner, torque killing, rectangle port heads that will require a crappy L76 intake, with matching throttle body...
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 07:49 PM
  #26  
Kraest's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,166
From: Inside Uranus
To clarify.

You can't run rectangle port heads on a stock bore LS1 like the LS7 or L92....besides, the runners are like 260cc+ on both heads...it wouldn't do anything on 346 cubes unless you were spinning it 8000+.

You can run the 6.0L LQ9 317 heads on the stock LS1. It will decrease compression by around 0.8-1.0 point.

Better?

Mike
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 08:45 PM
  #27  
Me>you's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 174
From: archbald, PA
Alright, it seems some of you are a little slow, so i'll try some pictures to ease it along...

6.0 truck castings, designated by 873 (99-00 LQ4) 317 (01 and up LQ4) 035 (02 and up LQ9...Cathedral port heads that are similar to LS6 on the exhaust side...

Cathedral ports LSX based heads:





L92 castings, designated by casting numbers 823 or 5364...Are the 6.2L V8 heads used in the Cadillac Escalade, GMC Sierra denali and Yukon denali, as well as in the Hummer H2...They have huge RECTANGLE ports...L92, LS3, L76

Rectangle Port heads:



hope this clears it up
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #28  
ponchoV8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 148
From: A pineapple under the sea.
Hey Hawk,

I recently had the same dilemma as you. I had an'97 Z28 6M. I loved that car. It had mile bolt-ons, ran mid -high 13's. BUT it had 167K miles when I got rid of it last year. The A/C would have cost over a grand to fix and the clutch was slowly slipping away. I traded it in for an '05 Malibu Maxx fearing the rise in gas prices. I should have kept the '97; it would have been paid off in less than a year, then I should have bought something else.

After a few weeks in the Maxx I was scouring the classifieds....LOL. Finally after a year I took a hit by being upside down on the Malibu, but I got a 25K mile 2002 Trans Am, Navy Blue, 4A/2.73 gear car....clean Carfax, clean Autocheck, clean GMVIS....been only back to the dealer 2 times for rear axle pinion seals.

You only live once, at least be happy with what you drive.
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 07:24 AM
  #29  
OLD 69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 136
I have been thinking of getting one myself.As far as the Cobra sure its fast but Im not into supercharged cars.Now Turbo's are a different thing.They get great gas mileage and unless your rich that makes it an easy choice.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
jayblev95
Track Kill Stories
3
Jan 15, 2015 07:48 AM
ModdedNerd
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
Jan 1, 2015 10:56 AM
YellowTransAm350
LT1 Based Engine Tech
22
Mar 2, 2003 03:38 PM
cryptopsy
Car Audio and Electronics
1
Aug 19, 2002 12:19 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.