LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

stock 0-60 on 01 SS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2003 | 03:58 PM
  #31  
psychocabbage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,901
From: Houston, Tx USA
Originally posted by CANTONRACER
For an estimate

http://www.auburnextremeracing.com/i...imes/index.htm
according to that site, I pulled a 4.77 0-60 when I first got the 6 speed car. hardly accurate but maybe a good place to be optimistic.. I would say add .3-.5 to its estimates.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 07:42 AM
  #32  
CANTONRACER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,764
From: North Canton, OH
It is simply plugging in numbers. He states it maybe off a couple of tenths...so it might be faster also.

I hardly doubt my car running 7.5@91.47 MPH with a 1.65 60' is doing 0-60 MPH around 4 seconds.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 08:29 AM
  #33  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
I was just looking at a brochure yesterday for the 2001 firehawk that a friend has , wich is basicly a ram-air , and it says that the 0-60 is 4.7 seconds
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 06:02 PM
  #34  
93 LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 131
From: Darien, IL
Yeah, I don't know what bozo would get 5.8 out of an LS1. I remember that Motor Trend got that out of a 2001 SS 6spd along w/ a 13.9@102 for a 1/4. Then I stopped reading their magazine when I see rediclous results. LT1's will do about 5.4-5.7 and LS1's I would say AVERAGE 5.1. Anyone with proper driving skills in an M6 can get into the 4's with an LS1. Thats a fact.

This discussion brings me back to 4 weeks ago when I had the oppourtunity to drive (2) 04' Corvette Z06's at a GM track open to the public. I was standing in line and some guy asked me what these ran 0-60 and I said that GM rated them @ 3.9. He laughed and said "BS". Immediately I knew what kind goof I was talking to. I told him to put a pair of slicks on that thing and I would do a 3.5 showroom stock. He just looked at me.
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 08:11 PM
  #35  
LetMeBurnU's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 220
From: BAY-AREA CALI
Originally posted by Omega9
Motor Trend or Car and Driver said the Camaro SS went 0-60 in 5.5 seconds, and the Trans Am WS6 went 0-60 in 4.8 seconds due to better traction.
Now thats some funny *** sh*t
I guess motor trend also said that stock SS went 13.1 and WS6 went 13.5 on a 1/4 mile due to better looking chrome stock rims
Old Nov 12, 2003 | 11:04 PM
  #36  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Originally posted by 93 LT1
Yeah, I don't know what bozo would get 5.8 out of an LS1. I remember that Motor Trend got that out of a 2001 SS 6spd along w/ a 13.9@102 for a 1/4. Then I stopped reading their magazine when I see rediclous results. LT1's will do about 5.4-5.7 and LS1's I would say AVERAGE 5.1. Anyone with proper driving skills in an M6 can get into the 4's with an LS1. Thats a fact.

This discussion brings me back to 4 weeks ago when I had the oppourtunity to drive (2) 04' Corvette Z06's at a GM track open to the public. I was standing in line and some guy asked me what these ran 0-60 and I said that GM rated them @ 3.9. He laughed and said "BS". Immediately I knew what kind goof I was talking to. I told him to put a pair of slicks on that thing and I would do a 3.5 showroom stock. He just looked at me.

LOL...dont that make you mad when they do such a ****ty test , I got archive test's of LT1's from motertrend saying that the 94 formula run's a 15.4 they ran it w/a 95 Z28 that ran a 14.3 same damn car same setup . I have seen bone stock LT1's run a 13.7-13.9 . Theya are supposed to have professional drivers testing them to !!!!! If i ever ran a 15+in a 4th gen 6 speed i would have to retire form the muscle car biz....
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 07:04 PM
  #37  
93 LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 131
From: Darien, IL
Yeah. You expect clean numbers from a national magazine, and then you see stupidity instead. Also, I noticed that every time it seems that they get a worse time in the Pontiac. Now, how the hell is that possible! A while back I was watching Motor Trend TV and they were testing some special Firebird. I believe it was that Hurst version with the gold circle in the hood. Came with Borla exhaust, shifter and other things stock. During the tests they set up this expensive eqiupment and then put a bonehead behind the wheel. Instead of launching the car properly the driver dumped the clutch at like 3K and burned thru 1st and 2nd, for a 0-60 and 1/4 mile time. Now come on man, WTF.
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 12:30 AM
  #38  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Originally posted by 93 LT1
Yeah. You expect clean numbers from a national magazine, and then you see stupidity instead. Also, I noticed that every time it seems that they get a worse time in the Pontiac. Now, how the hell is that possible! A while back I was watching Motor Trend TV and they were testing some special Firebird. I believe it was that Hurst version with the gold circle in the hood. Came with Borla exhaust, shifter and other things stock. During the tests they set up this expensive eqiupment and then put a bonehead behind the wheel. Instead of launching the car properly the driver dumped the clutch at like 3K and burned thru 1st and 2nd, for a 0-60 and 1/4 mile time. Now come on man, WTF.

Exactly !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 10:03 AM
  #39  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Originally posted by CANTONRACER
It is simply plugging in numbers. He states it maybe off a couple of tenths...so it might be faster also.

I hardly doubt my car running 7.5@91.47 MPH with a 1.65 60' is doing 0-60 MPH around 4 seconds.
Why do you dought it ? Sounds pretty close to me ! bout 4seconds , lower 4 .
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 10:22 AM
  #40  
CANTONRACER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,764
From: North Canton, OH
No...think about it. I am not going to be gaining over 30 mph in 3 a little over 3 seconds past 60 MPH. I am in third gear by the time I pass the 1/8 marker.
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 11:49 AM
  #41  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Originally posted by CANTONRACER
No...think about it. I am not going to be gaining over 30 mph in 3 a little over 3 seconds past 60 MPH. I am in third gear by the time I pass the 1/8 marker.
So how fast do you think your hitting 60 ?
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 11:57 AM
  #42  
psychocabbage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,901
From: Houston, Tx USA
Originally posted by robb4964
So how fast do you think your hitting 60 ?
he is easily getting in the 3's.. the 60' time alone is damn strong..
low 3's would be my guess.
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 12:04 PM
  #43  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Originally posted by psychocabbage
he is easily getting in the 3's.. the 60' time alone is damn strong..
low 3's would be my guess.
ok , thats what i was thinking before , but i thought he was saying he wasnt even running 4's . Got ya , it is daamn strong !
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
Jul 30, 2017 11:46 AM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
canbaufo
Parts For Sale
7
May 25, 2015 12:01 PM
MyShibbyZ28
Parts For Sale
0
Feb 14, 2015 12:05 PM
jayblev95
Track Kill Stories
3
Jan 15, 2015 07:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 AM.