LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

ls1 horsepower

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 08:08 AM
  #1  
lovescamaros25's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 153
ls1 horsepower

i know the 98-02 ls1 camaros are rated at 305 hp.but is that engine/brake hp,or at the rear wheels.
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 08:15 AM
  #2  
teke184's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 8,319
From: US 1 Mile Marker 52 in the Florida Keys
theoretically that is rated at the crank/engine

but most of them were dynoing 290-300 at the wheels bone stock. which shows that GM underrated them by a pretty good amount.

i think the most i ever saw a bone stock car dyno was something like 317hp...right down to the paper air filter.
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 11:38 AM
  #3  
coogsLS1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 640
From: Midwest
310 RWHP stock for me! After mods, my new LTs and my TR cam kit, Im pushing for 390RWHP
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 04:57 PM
  #4  
SFB767's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,486
From: FL
Most stock LS1 F-Bodies have about 340-350HP at the motor.
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #5  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
The F-bodies were just underrated because the Corvette was rated at 345 - 350 HP since the debut of the LS1 in 1997, and GM couldn't have another car in their line-up with the same *advertised* amount of power. So, even though the motors are the same, the '98+ F-bodies were rated at 305 - 310 HP, but with SS and WS6 packages, GM would actually advertise them as high as 345 HP, which is way more realistic.

Just FYI, the way to convert between flywheel horsepower and rear-wheel horsepower is this:

RWHP = FWHP x (1 - % drivetrain loss), ie: 350 FWHP x .85 (<- assuming a 15% loss) = 297.5 RWHP..........that's a realistic number to expect from an LS1 car.

Now, take a car that dyno'd ~310 RWHP, then go 310 RWHP / .85 = 365 FWHP. Now, maybe the engine really isn't making 365 HP, but in that case, the drivetrain losses are obviously less than 15%.
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 08:54 PM
  #6  
SFB767's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,486
From: FL
Here's the easiest way to figure out how much power the motor is making.

Take your dyno numbers and divide them by .82 if it's an auto. and .85 if it's a manual, it's that simple.

Here's an example (mine):

296/.82 = 361 FWHP
314/.82 = 383 FWTQ
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 09:04 PM
  #7  
psychocabbage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,901
From: Houston, Tx USA
again that is if you tend to subscribe to the 15% and 18% camps..

I personally think the M6 is more like 12% and the A4 is 15%..


I did 318rwhp stock.. paper filter makes more power than K&N so saying down to the paper filter is rather pointless..

After my latest runs, I think I can put down 320-325ish rwhp still bone stock.. only difference is I finally put in the replacement AC Delco filter.. hehe
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 09:29 PM
  #8  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally posted by psychocabbage
I personally think the M6 is more like 12% and the A4 is 15%..
I tend to agree with you on that. Take 2 stock LS1's, A4 and M6. With 350 flywheel HP, they'd be 298 and 308 RWHP respectively...............that sounds pretty accurate.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
13qtr
Parts For Sale
24
Oct 28, 2016 08:11 PM
Ericksd
Drivetrain
4
Jan 20, 2016 06:07 PM
Hal Fisher
Parts For Sale
0
Sep 30, 2015 09:03 PM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM
1slow93z28
Parts For Sale
0
Sep 1, 2015 06:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.