Here comes the 511 Cu.i. LSx :-)
#16
up to 2500 hp thats some boost or one big shot n20
im sceptical of boring the walls to 4.25 with leaving the .020 until i hear a few peole running that hardcore and not killing the engine. i know other engines do that just fine, but they are not talking the power this thing is capable of.
im sceptical of boring the walls to 4.25 with leaving the .020 until i hear a few peole running that hardcore and not killing the engine. i know other engines do that just fine, but they are not talking the power this thing is capable of.
#18
But that is TRULY an INSANE bore X stroke aluminum small block! Aluminum!.....
#19
I guess we still have a lot to find out about this block and it depends on what you read. In the recent GM High Tech Performance article, they state that the maximum bore is 4.25 and that would be only for naturally aspirated applications. They also stated that bore still leaves a 0.200 minimum wall thickness and the block is iron, so it weighs about twice what the LS alum blocks weigh. The article just never mentioned the maximum size was for forced induction.
#20
IMO, I'd do the smaller bore size just to have the extra cyl wall meat for a stronger block. On the 4.25" bore, that CYL wall seems REALLY thin! -For me! Even on aluminum! I can see an Iron block, I might trust it a little more, but w/ the pressures on an aluminum block w/ the 4.25 bore and 4.25 stroke, that's a lot... Even w/ the heat of running slightly lean on F.I. or N2O... I'd like a thicker cyl wall.
But that is TRULY an INSANE bore X stroke aluminum small block! Aluminum!.....
But that is TRULY an INSANE bore X stroke aluminum small block! Aluminum!.....
#23
#24
i wonder if tuning would be a problem, and if you can use the ls6 pcv setup? i dont know a thing about the other sensors like the knock sensor and crank position sensor.
#26
still not bad, i imagine only the rotating assembly should be a holdup, or am i wrong? plenty out there to make a custom cam, lifters, pushrods, ported heads, use a ls2 timing set, 90/90 intake and tb, 92lb injectors, im sure thats overkill, but who knows.
i wonder if tuning would be a problem, and if you can use the ls6 pcv setup? i dont know a thing about the other sensors like the knock sensor and crank position sensor.
i wonder if tuning would be a problem, and if you can use the ls6 pcv setup? i dont know a thing about the other sensors like the knock sensor and crank position sensor.
I think the biggest holdup to making huge power with this block will be the availability of new six-bolts-per-cylinder LS-style heads that flow enough to feed a 510ci engine.
#27
BTW in case you guys were curious, here is the video we shot on the L92 block... I must ahve been asleep at the Camera though as I missed that part about the L92 head being a bolt on 40 hp on the Ls2! DAYUM!
http://videos.camaroz28.com/video/b8...c800d7d064.htm
http://videos.camaroz28.com/video/b8...c800d7d064.htm
#29
If I were building an engine around this block, I'd be buying a Fast XFI or something similar to control it.
I think the biggest holdup to making huge power with this block will be the availability of new six-bolts-per-cylinder LS-style heads that flow enough to feed a 510ci engine.
I think the biggest holdup to making huge power with this block will be the availability of new six-bolts-per-cylinder LS-style heads that flow enough to feed a 510ci engine.
#30