LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Here comes the 511 Cu.i. LSx :-)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2007, 09:39 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
myslowcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: fairless hills pa
Posts: 1,326
up to 2500 hp thats some boost or one big shot n20

im sceptical of boring the walls to 4.25 with leaving the .020 until i hear a few peole running that hardcore and not killing the engine. i know other engines do that just fine, but they are not talking the power this thing is capable of.
myslowcamaro is offline  
Old 02-02-2007, 10:01 AM
  #17  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,488
I read in Hot Rod that it's strong enough for 40psi of boost when hogged all the way out to 4.500" bores.
JakeRobb is offline  
Old 02-02-2007, 11:46 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Bayer-Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N Falmouth MA
Posts: 2,597
Originally Posted by David94TA
Anyone know how big you can go with the LSX and still use forced induction?
IMO, I'd do the smaller bore size just to have the extra cyl wall meat for a stronger block. On the 4.25" bore, that CYL wall seems REALLY thin! -For me! Even on aluminum! I can see an Iron block, I might trust it a little more, but w/ the pressures on an aluminum block w/ the 4.25 bore and 4.25 stroke, that's a lot... Even w/ the heat of running slightly lean on F.I. or N2O... I'd like a thicker cyl wall.

But that is TRULY an INSANE bore X stroke aluminum small block! Aluminum!.....
Bayer-Z28 is offline  
Old 02-03-2007, 07:32 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
David94TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Posts: 487
I guess we still have a lot to find out about this block and it depends on what you read. In the recent GM High Tech Performance article, they state that the maximum bore is 4.25 and that would be only for naturally aspirated applications. They also stated that bore still leaves a 0.200 minimum wall thickness and the block is iron, so it weighs about twice what the LS alum blocks weigh. The article just never mentioned the maximum size was for forced induction.
David94TA is offline  
Old 02-03-2007, 08:22 AM
  #20  
Moderator
 
AL SS590 M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1998
Location: Charlotte,MI USA
Posts: 6,249
Originally Posted by Bayer-Z28
IMO, I'd do the smaller bore size just to have the extra cyl wall meat for a stronger block. On the 4.25" bore, that CYL wall seems REALLY thin! -For me! Even on aluminum! I can see an Iron block, I might trust it a little more, but w/ the pressures on an aluminum block w/ the 4.25 bore and 4.25 stroke, that's a lot... Even w/ the heat of running slightly lean on F.I. or N2O... I'd like a thicker cyl wall.

But that is TRULY an INSANE bore X stroke aluminum small block! Aluminum!.....
LSX block is an aftermarket iron block.
AL SS590 M6 is offline  
Old 02-03-2007, 09:16 AM
  #21  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,488
Originally Posted by AL SS590 M6
LSX block is an aftermarket iron block.
Yup. It's ~200 pounds heavier than the LS7 block.
JakeRobb is offline  
Old 02-03-2007, 09:23 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
myslowcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: fairless hills pa
Posts: 1,326
did they ever hint at a price yet? they beat around the bush that its very affordable. think it would kill the ls7 sales?
myslowcamaro is offline  
Old 02-03-2007, 09:24 AM
  #23  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,488
Originally Posted by myslowcamaro
did they ever hint at a price yet? they beat around the bush that its very affordable. think it would kill the ls7 sales?
Block only, something like $2500. Limited availability of everything else is going to hold it back for a while.
JakeRobb is offline  
Old 02-03-2007, 11:05 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
myslowcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: fairless hills pa
Posts: 1,326
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Block only, something like $2500. Limited availability of everything else is going to hold it back for a while.
still not bad, i imagine only the rotating assembly should be a holdup, or am i wrong? plenty out there to make a custom cam, lifters, pushrods, ported heads, use a ls2 timing set, 90/90 intake and tb, 92lb injectors, im sure thats overkill, but who knows.

i wonder if tuning would be a problem, and if you can use the ls6 pcv setup? i dont know a thing about the other sensors like the knock sensor and crank position sensor.
myslowcamaro is offline  
Old 02-03-2007, 11:25 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Posts: 901
There will be some crazy motors built with this block.
chuck is offline  
Old 02-03-2007, 11:59 AM
  #26  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,488
Originally Posted by myslowcamaro
still not bad, i imagine only the rotating assembly should be a holdup, or am i wrong? plenty out there to make a custom cam, lifters, pushrods, ported heads, use a ls2 timing set, 90/90 intake and tb, 92lb injectors, im sure thats overkill, but who knows.

i wonder if tuning would be a problem, and if you can use the ls6 pcv setup? i dont know a thing about the other sensors like the knock sensor and crank position sensor.
If I were building an engine around this block, I'd be buying a Fast XFI or something similar to control it.

I think the biggest holdup to making huge power with this block will be the availability of new six-bolts-per-cylinder LS-style heads that flow enough to feed a 510ci engine.
JakeRobb is offline  
Old 02-03-2007, 02:44 PM
  #27  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Adam Bruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 29
BTW in case you guys were curious, here is the video we shot on the L92 block... I must ahve been asleep at the Camera though as I missed that part about the L92 head being a bolt on 40 hp on the Ls2! DAYUM!

http://videos.camaroz28.com/video/b8...c800d7d064.htm
Adam Bruce is offline  
Old 02-05-2007, 12:44 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
LT1Formulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Big Rapids, Mi
Posts: 109
SDPC has these blocks listed for $1995
LT1Formulation is offline  
Old 02-08-2007, 05:16 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
YBNORMEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
If I were building an engine around this block, I'd be buying a Fast XFI or something similar to control it.

I think the biggest holdup to making huge power with this block will be the availability of new six-bolts-per-cylinder LS-style heads that flow enough to feed a 510ci engine.
I just read that ET can cast in the extra bosses on there heads.
YBNORMEL is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 07:09 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
myslowcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: fairless hills pa
Posts: 1,326
Originally Posted by LT1Formulation
SDPC has these blocks listed for $1995
Originally Posted by YBNORMEL
I just read that ET can cast in the extra bosses on there heads.
links please? i believe, just wanted to read and see.
myslowcamaro is offline  


Quick Reply: Here comes the 511 Cu.i. LSx :-)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 PM.