LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Had car dynoed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 10:42 PM
  #1  
SpecForceZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 474
From: Las Vegas, NV
Had car dynoed

Mine is a 2002 A4, with the 3.23 gears, with the following mods:
SLP Lid, cutout, ported and polished MAF, and a passive FRA.

314rwhp, and 324 lb. ft of torque

How is that compared to other similar cars like mine?
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 10:57 PM
  #2  
99blackSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,719
From: Bay Area, CA
Thats good. I would guess its a little above par. Most LS1s dyno 295-310rwhp stock.
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 11:45 PM
  #3  
95TA8280's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,123
Originally posted by 99blackSS
Thats good. I would guess its a little above par. Most LS1s dyno 295-310rwhp stock.
Even the 01-02s?

I think thats just about right, maybe a little low. Actually, I think that sounds right. With a catback/cutout he'll see 320.
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 11:49 PM
  #4  
99blackSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,719
From: Bay Area, CA
Your right that is a tad low, I got the torque and hp numbers mixed up. Not to worry still better then what 99.934325435% get stock.
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 11:56 PM
  #5  
SpecForceZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 474
From: Las Vegas, NV
Hey just out of curiosity, what's the flywheel HP/torque. I dunno how to convert from rwhp to fwhp. All i know is that autos drivetrain loss is 20%. Thanks
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 12:01 AM
  #6  
99blackSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,719
From: Bay Area, CA
I think its 18%. If it is 18% you would be looking at close to 370fwhp.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 01:05 AM
  #7  
danno02SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
From: Pasadena,CA,USA
Re: Had car dynoed

Originally posted by SpecForceZ28
Mine is a 2002 A4, with the 3.23 gears, with the following mods:
SLP Lid, cutout, ported and polished MAF, and a passive FRA.

314rwhp, and 324 lb. ft of torque

How is that compared to other similar cars like mine?
Better than mine (SLP LID and K&N only mods):
309.6rwhp/328.7rwtq
Stock dyno in Sig.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 07:52 AM
  #8  
95GRNZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,779
From: Denton, TX
Thumbs up

I think it is a tad on the lower side for a 01+ car, but still a good starting point.

Good job!

TS
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 08:51 AM
  #9  
SteveC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 420
From: Poway CA, where GOD and the sun always shines
Thumbs up

I think those numbers are very good, my 2001 Z28 with lid, catback, and 3.73's was 291RWHP, 355RWTQ (both at 5400RPM).

SteveC
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 09:40 AM
  #10  
Behemoth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 63
From: Apex,NC, USA
Identical to my dyno. I have M6 WS6 with lid.


Chuck

2002 WS6
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 07:01 PM
  #11  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Smile

Those numbers are great IMO! Remember, A4's will show lower RWHP than M6 cars, so that's pretty good!

The equation to figure out FWHP (fly-wheel horsepower) is this:

FWHP = RWHP / (1 - percentage loss)
(remember, percentage is written as a decimal)

Example:

314 RWHP / (1 - .18) = 382.9 FWHP!!!

Now even if you go conservative and say that the A4 only used ~10% power, you still get:

314 RWHP / (1 - .10) = 348.8 FWHP! (which is exactly what the LS1 is rated at...........well, in the 'Vette). In reality though, we know that the drivetrain loss is higher than 10%, so your engine is making more than 350 HP........probably closer to 370+ FWHP.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 08:03 PM
  #12  
iwon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 77
01 ws6 cold air lid
324hp 344tq
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #13  
edg1957's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 264
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Actually, I think that sounds right. With a catback/cutout he'll see 320
But he has a cutout, so I don't think it'll improve with a cat back.

It sounds about right. I did 317, then my last was 322. i dynoed before I did the FRA and ported the Maf though. i think it feels stronger now. I am waiting for a set of Lt's and I'll go back!

Dyno video

Ed

Last edited by edg1957; Oct 6, 2003 at 11:23 PM.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 08:14 AM
  #14  
Mikie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 594
From: Belmont North Carolina.
I have an M6 with just cat back and just dynoed 319 rwhp and 330 lbft of tq.
Pretty good numbers if you ask me.
I have seen a few autos dyno @ or below 300rwhp.
May be the Wednesday car, Friday car deal
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 10:47 AM
  #15  
darrens99formul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
From: Rochester, NY
It looks about 5 RWHP less then what I would have expected but overall not bad. You got a fast car and that's all that really matters. Heck our aftermarket torque converters tend to eat some RWHP but yet make our cars much faster.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 AM.