LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

CC 218/224 Users, Opinions Please?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 09:36 PM
  #1  
Keiii's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 23
From: The Buckle
Question CC 218/224 Users, Opinions Please?

I was just wanting some feed back on the
people that have the
Comp Cams 218/224. .527/.534 on 114LSA.

Any opinions.
I was looking for a lower lift mild cam that
would give decent power/torque and great driveability.

Any highs or lows for this cam. It would be
intended for a mild LS1.


Thanks for any info.
Old Jul 23, 2003 | 07:52 PM
  #2  
Keiii's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 23
From: The Buckle
anybody on here have or had this cam?
Old Jul 24, 2003 | 11:01 AM
  #3  
Freak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 446
From: Lincoln Park, MI US
is there a specific reason you wanted to go with a low lift cam? I would personaly go with an Xtreme or Xtreme R lobe instead of the low lift ones. You're going to have to change springs anyway, and the extra lift will help make more power.

I would go with a Xtreme R 218 lobe on a single pattern if I were looking at a mild cam. not that the cam you have chosen is bad, but wouldnt be my first choice, mainly because of the low lift

cant comment on the driveability of that cam

for the record I have a comp 224/224 .568/.568
Old Jul 24, 2003 | 12:03 PM
  #4  
pekkaz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19
The idea with a mild lift cam is to be able to use ls6 springs and have at least some peace of mind when going for long rides with a modified car.

If it's .05 to .1 seconds faster at the track due to higher lift is not necessarily enough to justify increased likelihood for sewing machine sound, valve guide wear, rocker arms exploding, springs failing and taking out the engine...

CC 218/224 is one of the cams I've been looking into as well, Lunati 222/230 might also be interesting.
Old Jul 24, 2003 | 03:16 PM
  #5  
BigZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 218
From: Lubbock, Texas
I do not have any info on the cam you are looking at, but I can give you some info on one of the smaller cams we carry that you might be interested in.
We have a 220/220, .564"/.564" on a 112LSA and 114LSA. We installed the one on a 114LSA last night. It went into a 2000 Vette(M6) with stock exhaust(Manifolds, cats, mufflers, etc.). He picked up 31RWHP with the cam. This is a great cam if you are not looking for a big cam and still want to make some nice power. We put in Comp 918 springs. The drivability is great, especially after a little tuning.
Let me know if there's anything we can do for you!

Brian
Old Jul 24, 2003 | 08:08 PM
  #6  
mr_muff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 797
From: Surrey, BC
was that 31 hp before or after tuning?
Old Jul 25, 2003 | 09:20 AM
  #7  
BigZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 218
From: Lubbock, Texas
The 31RWHP was after tuning. We picked up ~3 with tuning.

Brian
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 08:17 PM
  #8  
foff667's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 398
From: Trenton, NJ
Originally posted by BigZ28
The 31RWHP was after tuning. We picked up ~3 with tuning.

Brian
From what i understand then is going to a larger cam nomatter the size basically the springs have to be changed out...ok then what do you guys charge for an install of the springs and the cam?

Thanks
Bill
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scorch1
Cars For Sale
3
Jun 30, 2015 11:24 PM
ecthemc
New Member Introduction
9
Jun 19, 2015 06:54 AM
Chophouse
New Member Introduction
3
Jun 18, 2015 08:25 AM
MadMav
Parts For Sale
3
Jun 15, 2015 09:51 PM
Captain Kirk
Midwest
4
Sep 8, 2002 01:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.