LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

1999 Ss Hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 06:53 PM
  #1  
Black94Camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 120
From: Arizona
1999 Ss Hp?

I know the 1999 Z-28's had 305HP at the crank stock, but what did the 1999 SS's have stock? As well as the 2000 SS?

Thanx
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #2  
MasterEvilAce's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 755
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

They were just rated slightly higher. The SS's might dyno a bit better if they were equipped with certain things like an exhaust package, or so. Otherwise, they're just rated higher, and are just as fast as a Z28
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 08:29 PM
  #3  
Black94Camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 120
From: Arizona
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

Oh Ok .... I just found that they are rated 320HP. But equally fast ok.
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 09:09 PM
  #4  
RussStang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

What he means is that both motors are equally underrated by GM, and both z28s and SSs will dyno 350hp at the crank if you were to pull the motor out of the car and stick it on an engine dyno. F-Bodies (Camaros and their Firebird twins) typically dyno right around the same as a 97-04 c5 Corvette.
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 10:49 PM
  #5  
GhostZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,326
From: Tulsa, OK
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

yup, but the loss is in the drivetrain...so you're really feeling about 290-300 at the wheels
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 11:01 PM
  #6  
RussStang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

Originally Posted by GhostZ28
yup, but the loss is in the drivetrain...so you're really feeling about 290-300 at the wheels
Yeah, but he was asking what the hp levels were at the crank, not the ground.
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:02 AM
  #7  
GhostZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,326
From: Tulsa, OK
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

oohh sory =(. Anyway, why did GM underrate the crank HP so low?
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:08 AM
  #8  
MasterEvilAce's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 755
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

so it wouldn't take sales away from the Corvette. Who would buy a 350HP corvette if they could get a 350HP Camaro? (that's the reasoning mainly)

might also be for insurance reasons, etc.
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 09:27 AM
  #9  
PatFitz9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 9
From: Glenview, IL
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

Originally Posted by MasterEvilAce
might also be for insurance reasons, etc.
yeah, that extra 30 hp makes it hurt just a little less when they assrape you on a camaro :P
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:35 AM
  #10  
2000slp2768's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 127
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

see sig
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 05:35 PM
  #11  
Black94Camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 120
From: Arizona
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

wow so with just a lid you had 317HP at the wheels..... thats impressive
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 09:54 PM
  #12  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

What kind of dyno??? Makes a huge difference...
I've seen anywhere from 280s to 310s rwhp on stock LS1 f-bodies of those years on a dynojet. Each car is different as is the outside factors (temp, humidity, etc) and so is each dyno. You can't really compare runs made from one day to the next let alone different cars on different dynos on different days strung across the country.

Dyno numbers mean little seeing how I've outran cars that made more power on the dyno.
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:39 PM
  #13  
RussStang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

Originally Posted by Greed4Speed
as is the outside factors (temp, humidity, etc)
This may be true, but I don't remember the last time I have seen a car dyno where this isn't accounted for. All dyno results are typically standardized with the SAE correction factor, although some dyno operators still use the STD correction factor.
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #14  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

Originally Posted by RussStang
This may be true, but I don't remember the last time I have seen a car dyno where this isn't accounted for. All dyno results are typically standardized with the SAE correction factor, although some dyno operators still use the STD correction factor.

You never know what numbers people will report on boards. They very well may be uncorrected.
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 07:51 PM
  #15  
CJ Black LS1 Z28 M6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 418
From: Atlantic City, New Jersey (south jersey)
Re: 1999 Ss Hp?

My buddies 00 SS m6 dynoed 322rwhp 334ft lb's with slp lid. If you didn't know 01-02 F-Bodies got a smaller cam,LS6 intake some other changes. My 01 SS bone stock right down to the paper air filter 306.7hp 327.2ft lbs of torque. I have the dyno graph somewhere
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1slow93z28
Parts For Sale
0
Sep 1, 2015 06:22 PM
Troy Andritsch
New Member Introduction
2
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 AM
vwb11356
Drivetrain
2
Jul 22, 2015 06:51 PM
mrwz28
Cars For Sale
0
Jul 8, 2015 09:11 PM
NVMYTA
LS1 Based Engine Tech
6
Jun 18, 2002 05:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.