General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

LT1 & LS1 Visual Differences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #1  
Bob5150's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 61
LT1 & LS1 Visual Differences?

I didn't know that there were visual differences in the 4th Gen Camaro's. I thought the only difference between the V6 and the Z28 were the "Z28" badges. But what is the visual difference between all the 4th Gen cars, besides the badges?
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 09:42 AM
  #2  
OBE1 95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 4,950
From: San Diego, CA
Re: LT1 & LS1 Visual Differences?

The biggest difference is the integrated head lights that started in 1998 with the LS1. Tail lights changed in 1997 (added the yellow turn signal).
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 09:43 AM
  #3  
OBE1 95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 4,950
From: San Diego, CA
Re: LT1 & LS1 Visual Differences?

Good reference site: http://www.f-body.org/faq/4/4_1.htm
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 09:44 AM
  #4  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Re: LT1 & LS1 Visual Differences?

'93-97 cars (the LT1 years) have a pointed nose with rectangular headlights. Like this.

'98-02 cars (LS1 years) have a rounded nose with oval headlights. Like this.

From the doors back, AFAIK they look identical except for colors, exhaust tips and wheel options.
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 12:35 PM
  #5  
Bob5150's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 61
Re: LT1 & LS1 Visual Differences?

Oh, ok, I knew about the taillight and front end change from 98+, I just didn't realize that they were referred to as LT1 and LS1. I definitly think the LT1 cars look a lot meaner and cooler, especially with the tri-colored taillights.
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 12:41 PM
  #6  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: LT1 & LS1 Visual Differences?

Read the FAQ.

The LT1 was one of the engines used in the 1993-1997 models. The others were two different dispacment V6's. The LS1 was one of the engines used in the 1998-2002 models, along with the 3.8L V6. A 98, for example is only an "LS1" if it has an LS1 engine. It's just coincidence that they changed the version of the V8 engine the same year they made significant changes to the front end design.

As for the engines, they have no similarities, other than the fact they are both made by GM and have the same cylinder bore spacing.... beyond that they are different as night and day.
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 12:58 PM
  #7  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Re: LT1 & LS1 Visual Differences?

Well, aside from the fact that they're both naturally aspirated, internal combustion, fuel-injected, Otto four-stroke, 5.7L V8's using pushrods and chain-driven cams...



Oh, aren't the cylinder banks separated by the same angle, too? I don't know if it's 45, 60, or 90 degrees, or none of the above...
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 12:39 AM
  #8  
jah1542's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 162
From: Nebraska
Re: LT1 & LS1 Visual Differences?

Originally Posted by robvas
1993 had yellow dash lettering
(no offense '93 owners, I've just never liked those gages)

Originally Posted by Injuneer
It's just coincidence that they changed the version of the V8 engine the same year they made significant changes to the front end design.
I thought the front end re-design was necessary because the LS1 is a little taller than the LT1, and hood clearance was an issue. I do realize I'm questioning a CZ28 guru here, and probably totally wrong, but I'm just curious...
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 07:38 AM
  #9  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: LT1 & LS1 Visual Differences?

Originally Posted by jah1542
(no offense '93 owners, I've just never liked those gages)



I thought the front end re-design was necessary because the LS1 is a little taller than the LT1, and hood clearance was an issue. I do realize I'm questioning a CZ28 guru here, and probably totally wrong, but I'm just curious...
That's a good point.
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 06:24 PM
  #10  
Janny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 677
Re: LT1 & LS1 Visual Differences?

I'm not sure that is true. It seems to me that I recall people talking about putting the LS1 into an LT1 powered car. I'd be interested to know for sure though. I think GM took a step backward in terms of styling with the '98 and up model, and I wonder whether it was absolutely necessary to go in that direction.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rideordie
LS1 Based Engine Tech
9
Nov 5, 2019 04:52 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
InfernalVortex
LT1 Based Engine Tech
3
Jan 17, 2015 09:35 AM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
Jul 4, 2005 05:00 PM
Aneurysm
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
12
Sep 10, 2002 05:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 PM.