99+ V6 Mustangs are quick. Stock for stock they hang if not beat most 96-98 V8 Mustangs.

 

ok well to try to see what ive got i raced my friend just a few hours ago in a 0-70 race and by the time we hit 70 i was 3-4 car lengths ahead of him?

any so what do yall think?
and it is a 2001 v-6 mustang with a kn filter plus few small things

 

I may be the only one that thinks so but I feel the V6 stang with mods would give you a run for your money.

 

ya, the way everyone on here talks it sounds like the stang should beat me but thats not the case at all i smoke it everytime.

 

Have 3 Trans Ams. An 84 that HAD a 305 Rodchester Carb and I yanked it out and went with a 383 Stroker matched to a Mad Dogs Punisher 700R4 and I turn high 9's in a quarter. Hoped for better but whatever. Have a 88 that still has a 305 HO with T.B.I. and it is COMPLETLY stock and its a slow piece of crap. Then came the 95 Trans Am with the LT1 and it is a Huge difference over the 305. So I'm sorry to say but I SERIOUSLY doubt you beat one with what you described. Sorry to bust your bubble.

 

Ya know, all this talk is somewhat silly. It is called "banch racing" and it really proves nothing. You need to take your car to the track and get a timeslip. Post your results and then we can start guessing what your car has done to it. Pictures of whats under the hood would help too.

We need 2 things:

1) timeslip
2) pictures

 

well i cant get pics or a timeslip any time soon the race with the stang is acurate, so thats about all i can say any more comments is nice though,
my personal oppinion is ive got something else under my hood but i dont know that for a fact

 

Your motor is modded and it is barely pulling away from a stock lt1, just drop 1200 on an lt1.