General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

G-Tech?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 01:40 PM
  #16  
1995CamaroZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 117
From: Las Vegas, NV
Re: G-Tech?!

Thanks for all the great Info.
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 01:56 PM
  #17  
Red_94Formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 537
From: Watertown, Mass
Re: G-Tech?!

The new g-tench pro 2 ss or rr. Sells for 200 to 250 on ebay. It is susposed to be more accurate. Il be getting it in a few months but it will be too cold in Boston to test it.
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 02:41 PM
  #18  
IROC-T's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 866
From: So.Cal on the Best coast
Re: G-Tech?!

Originally Posted by Lower
I have one of these, very low end models. It is useful for comparing before and after mods, but I certainly wouldn't go around quoting times from it as proof. It seems pretty accurate on 1/4 mile time (within 1/10th I'd guess), but the MPH is way off -I'd guess it to be 6-7% high.

It measures:
1* 0 to 60 mph time
1* 1/4 mile elapsed time (E.T.)
2* 1/4 mile trap speed
4* Instantaneous lateral acceleration (G s)
4* Sustained lateral acceleration (G s)
3* 60 mph braking distance
3* Instantaneous braking Gs
3* Sustained braking Gs
5* Horsepower

1= Useful, and accurate enough to give a person a good idea of what real times might be. The only thing this low end does well enough to even worry about.

2= Far enough off that you'll wonder how it can be as accurate on the 2 items (see #1) that it is actually accurate on. 6-7 % high, I'd guess.

3= I don't autocross, nor do I care about braking distance unless it's a distance of "not soon enough", but by then it's too late. I'd assume that the 60-0 would be accurate, based upon the 0-60 being acceptable.

4= I still don't autocross. Lateral G's? Who cares? Not me. Want to measure them? Mount the unit sideways -seems pretty cheesy. Might be accurate, but I somehow doubt it.

5= Horsepower. HAHAHAHHAAHHA!
Ahem. What an utterly useless addition. I have no idea how they tested this and found it to be within 5%, let alone 50%. yes it is that far off. And you could test it 10 times down the same stretch, and never get 2 numbers within 25 HP, I'd bet. This measurement is just junk.

Lastly, before I bought one of these again, I'd drive around and try to find a flat, straight road. I mean flat and straight. I live in SE MN, and there is one (seemingly) flat 1/2 mile stretch within 30 miles of my house. 1. And even it may not be flat enough.
Seriously.
It needs to be perfectly flat... and straight.
No.
Even flatter than that road you are thinking of.
Nope, flatter than that road too.

Honestly. Spend the hours upon hours that I have driving around looking for a flat road. You never realise how unflat a road is until you actually need a perfect one. And it can't be curvy either. Flat and straight.

Well said,but you left out long on the road part,lol! For $39 it's close enough for practice if you do find that elusive road,maybe the freeway at midnight if there isn't any traffic.
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 04:40 PM
  #19  
1995CamaroZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 117
From: Las Vegas, NV
Re: G-Tech?!

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DZNUTTS
Parts For Sale
3
May 19, 2004 03:55 PM
lil305gta
3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech
9
Mar 15, 2004 07:13 PM
Reptile5.7L
LT1 Based Engine Tech
3
Mar 2, 2004 06:22 PM
Robbie
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Feb 27, 2003 11:35 PM
chevyboy_z28
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
Nov 4, 2002 08:37 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 AM.