Fuel and Ignition Fuel Pumps and Systems, Ignition and Spark Systems

Fuel pressure...is it supposed to drop @ WOT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #1  
FuryZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 822
From: Lawrence, KS, USA
Fuel pressure...is it supposed to drop @ WOT?

More specifically, is it supposed to drop @ WOT in the higher RPMs? From what I've heard others talk about it, I was always under the impression that fuel pressure raised with the opening of the throttle...is that wrong? The reason I ask is, I have a 1993 Camaro with a 255 lph Walbro pump, Racetronix fuel pump voltage booster, 30# fuel injectors, and an Aeromotive AFPR. Anyways, I just recently installed a electric fuel pressure gauge, and it reads 43 psi @ idle. If I take it WOT, the fuel pressure slowly drops progressively with the RPMs rising. At WOT @ ~5900 RPM, the fuel pressure is as low as 34 psi. There's no noticeable performance loss, nor is there any irregular "behavior" exhibited by the car; the only noticeable change is on the fuel pressure gauge. Is it supposed to do that? If it's not, anyone have an explanation as to why this is happening??
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 03:28 PM
  #2  
OBE1 95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 4,950
From: San Diego, CA
You don't want your fuel pressure to drop at WOT, you're running the engine lean. Stock fuel pressure is 41 - 47 psi with the vacuum line removed from the FPR (simulates WOT), so with the vacuum line on at idle, your fuel pressure would read around 36 psi. My Walbro 255 is able to supply my 593 rwhp setup with stock fuel lines. Try installing a new fuel filter as an old one will restrict fuel flow.

Last edited by OBE1 95Z28; Nov 25, 2006 at 06:18 PM.
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 04:50 PM
  #3  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
The FPR is vacuum referenced. Typically, vacuum is lowest at WOT so FP should drop as well. How much is it dropping?

Rich
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 05:52 PM
  #4  
FuryZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 822
From: Lawrence, KS, USA
It drops progressively as the RPMs increase, as much as a 9 psi drop @ 5900 RPM...
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 06:01 PM
  #5  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally Posted by SGFuryZ
It drops progressively as the RPMs increase, as much as a 9 psi drop @ 5900 RPM...

If you have a vacuum gauge, you can be sure. But it seems like it may be dropping a bit more than I would expect. If you have 16" of vacuum at idle and it drops to 2" at WOT that would equate to a 7psi drop. 9psi equates to 18".

Rich
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 06:17 PM
  #6  
OBE1 95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 4,950
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by rskrause
The FPR is vacuum referenced. Typically, vacuum is lowest at WOT so FP should drop as well. How much is it dropping?

Rich
I agree with you Rich that fuel pressure is vacuum referenced, but it is inversely proportional, that's why you see a rise in fuel pressure when you remove the vacuum line from the FPR when the engine is idling, as the regulator is now seeing atmospheric pressure (no vacuum).
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 06:32 PM
  #7  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally Posted by OBE1 95Z28
I agree with you Rich that fuel pressure is vacuum referenced, but it is inversely proportional, that's why you see a rise in fuel pressure when you remove the vacuum line from the FPR when the engine is idling, as the regulator is now seeing atmospheric pressure (no vacuum).
DOH!!! Damn dyslexia (really, I have it). Less negative = more positive!!!

Rich
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 02:30 AM
  #8  
FuryZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 822
From: Lawrence, KS, USA
So, you're saying there's too much vacuum? You've lost me...
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #9  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
At idle you have full vacuum, fuel pressure should be lower than the pressure the injector was rated at. At WOT, there is little intake manifold vacuum, so the pressure should be higher than it was at idle.

The way to check:

-let the engine idle and pull the vacuum compensation line off (block the line to prevent a vacuum leak). Measure the fuel pressure. If your "tune" is based on LT1's standard fuel pressure, you would want to see 43.5psi. GM accepts anything from 41-47psi as being within specs.

-reattach the vacuum line. Fuel pressure at idle should drop in proportion to intake manifold vacuum. A drop of 8 psi would not be unusual with a stock cam, as little as 3 or 4psi drop with a more radical cam.

-tape the pressure gauge to the windshield, take it out on the road to max load/max RPM. The fuel pressure should not drop more than 2psi below the number you got at idle without the vacuum line.

Given the description of your system, its either a weak fuel pump, or yet another screwed up Aeromotive fuel pressure regulator.
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 12:12 PM
  #10  
FuryZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 822
From: Lawrence, KS, USA
Doesn't an Aeromotive rep frequent this board? Anyone know his screen name so I can contact him...?
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 09:49 PM
  #11  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
The guy they sent to give me a hard time no longer works for Aeromotive. Not aware of anyone from Aeromotive currently on the board.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 07:50 AM
  #12  
93transam1234's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,146
From: Maryland
Wow old thread LOL

i have the same thing happeneing, only difrence is it is only happening when i am at 6000 rpms or so wich happens to e wen my car starts breaking up.

Anyways i have all stock fuel system, my question is can a stock FPR restrict the flow at WOT, or is that just with at aftermarket ones?

Gawd Injuneer you have been errrm "commenting" on Aeromotive for a long time LOL
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 10:10 AM
  #13  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
The LT1 fuel pressure regulator is not in the fuel supply line, so it can't restrict fuel supply side flow. The FPR is in the return line. It controls fuel pressure by pinching down on the fuel return flow. If you are using more fuel than the pump can supply, the FPR will close down completely, and the fuel pressure will start to drop. If the FPR has a leaky diaphragm, it may not hold the required pressure, since it would be fully closed and the diaphragm would be leaking fuel directly into the intake manifold via the vacuum line.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 11:53 AM
  #14  
93transam1234's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,146
From: Maryland
im still a little confused, and just need some reasurance.
At idel i took off the vaccum line and got about 45 psi. and when i put the vaccum line back on i got around 40 Psi (a have cc306 cam so less vaccume then stock) So this means my FPR is working correctly right? Also their is no gas in the vaccume line.

At WOT with the vaccume line still off my fuel presure stayed right at 45 psi (didnt move on psi from idel) But as i climbed the RPM's up to about 6000 the PSI went down to about 35-40(i couldnt stare at it to read the exact number) As soon as the car shifted and the rpms went down the PSI went back up. I heard that this is normal and nothing to worry about and also heard it means i need a new fuel pump (going to try the filter first). This could not be caused from the FPR correct? Since it holds the PSI allway untill i hit 6k RPM's

OK one more thing i noticed, if i hit the gas hard from like a 20 mph roll and put a lot of load on the engine the presure will drop for a second to about 40 PSI- Is this normal?

NOW if those 2 things are not normal and it cant be caused by a faulty FPR, can it be caused by my injectors staying open to long (the car is running at about 110% duty cycle at 6000 rpm's) or is it the pump that is not abel to supply the PSI that quick?

I know this is long and i have another post asking some of the same questions, i just didnt have all the knowlege when those where posted, so i am going to delet them.
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 12:19 PM
  #15  
Kevin Blown 95 TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,684
Originally Posted by 97formula1234
im still a little confused, and just need some reasurance.
At idel i took off the vaccum line and got about 45 psi. and when i put the vaccum line back on i got around 40 Psi (a have cc306 cam so less vaccume then stock) So this means my FPR is working correctly right? Also their is no gas in the vaccume line.
yes

At WOT with the vaccume line still off my fuel presure stayed right at 45 psi (didnt move on psi from idel) But as i climbed the RPM's up to about 6000 the PSI went down to about 35-40(i couldnt stare at it to read the exact number) As soon as the car shifted and the rpms went down the PSI went back up. I heard that this is normal and nothing to worry about and also heard it means i need a new fuel pump (going to try the filter first). This could not be caused from the FPR correct? Since it holds the PSI allway untill i hit 6k RPM's
you'd like it to stay up there or you might run lean. You might try a voltage booster or larger wires.

OK one more thing i noticed, if i hit the gas hard from like a 20 mph roll and put a lot of load on the engine the presure will drop for a second to about 40 PSI- Is this normal?
same thing - not enough fuel

NOW if those 2 things are not normal and it cant be caused by a faulty FPR, can it be caused by my injectors staying open to long (the car is running at about 110% duty cycle at 6000 rpm's) or is it the pump that is not abel to supply the PSI that quick?
not enough volume

I know this is long and i have another post asking some of the same questions, i just didnt have all the knowlege when those where posted, so i am going to delet them.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 PM.