Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Why do people move MAF to pressure side?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 07:13 AM
  #1  
BAD 97 WS-6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 153
From: Oak Creek, WI
Why do people move MAF to pressure side?

I need someone to explain why some people do this? Does the car run better? Why don't they have it come this way on the install? I am willing to try anything if it helps.
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 07:55 AM
  #2  
95 Silver TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,132
From: Florida
Here are my reason why I moved mine to the pressure side.

I was getting some surging at idle and a few folks here said it was normal and if I moved the maf to the pressure side, it would help with the surging. I moved it and my surging at idle was gone.

The other reason I wanted to move it is because when the MAF is located at the inlet location (under the car) its more prone to the elements and can get wet. Back when I had my maf under the car on the inlet side, It got wet a few times and twice in the rain, it threw a maf code while running funky. Since I moved it to the pressure side, it obviously does not get wet anymore and I never got the codes again in the rain.

Most folks normally move it to the pressure side so they can have a complete hard intake set up made that wont collapse and a bigger air filter to pick up a little more boost.


Hope that helps,
Claude
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 11:33 AM
  #3  
1LEThumper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 329
From: TEXAS
Yep, I was seeing idle rpms go from 500-1500 on a good day before I moved the MAF. I was also starting to suck the stock ATI filter shut as well.

MAF is moved and the piping has been changed....all is good for now
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 12:25 PM
  #4  
thewinner's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,090
i would assume another benefit would be the ability to still drive the car if boost blows the intake tubing apart
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 12:29 PM
  #5  
1LEThumper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 329
From: TEXAS
yeah that too, completely forgot about that because I did blow a intercooler pipe off the car on the way home the other night, drove just fine...just made a little more noise
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 02:18 PM
  #6  
BAD 97 WS-6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 153
From: Oak Creek, WI
Thanx for the info. Are there any performance gains by doing this?
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 04:07 PM
  #7  
1LEThumper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 329
From: TEXAS
I doubt it since most cars that are blow thru....or at least mine is maxed out around 4000rpms at that point all of the fuel tables are manualy entered into the program (unless there is some other way of doing it I don't know about) so if that was the case the only performance gains you would see would be in the lower rpm range. The biggest gain as far as I'm conserned is just simple driveablity and that alone was worth moving it.
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 05:18 PM
  #8  
BAD 97 WS-6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 153
From: Oak Creek, WI
thanx for the info guys
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 07:19 PM
  #9  
5.0THIS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 971
From: Colorado
I believe another thing this lets you do is vent to atmoshpere with a blow off valve.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
DirtyDaveW
Parts For Sale
1
Mar 15, 2015 07:01 PM
edman
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Jan 25, 2015 02:41 PM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
Jul 4, 2005 05:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 AM.