Turbo charger with hot cam
Re: Turbo charger with hot cam
Originally Posted by detroit1994z28
Just came to mind how would the lt4 hot cam work with a turbo charger. Since both start to kick in at top end??
Re: Turbo charger with hot cam
The HC works ok, but isn't the optimum for a turbo setup. It would be better suited to a S/C. At least that is what most cam grinders have told me. I made 405/513 at 6 psi with the HC on a stock motor, with my JY twins. So it WILL work, but your probably leaving some power on the table.
Take a look on Competition Motorsports site; they have numerous turbo and s/c specific cams listed, and you will notice that they have totally different specs.
And turbos don't "kick in on the top end", that is more like a S/C curve.
Take a look on Competition Motorsports site; they have numerous turbo and s/c specific cams listed, and you will notice that they have totally different specs.
And turbos don't "kick in on the top end", that is more like a S/C curve.
Re: Turbo charger with hot cam
112 shouldn't be considered low LSA. Most articles say to use 112-114 LSA for turbo, whereas NA would require 104-108.
The problem maybe the duration split. Most turbo cams are single pattern or reverse split. The Hot Cam may work with a well designed header and high A/R turbo since that would reduce backpressure.
BTW, I don't really consider a turbo OR hot cam to be top-end. Both come in low in the rpm range as compared to a CC306/centrifugal.
Mike
The problem maybe the duration split. Most turbo cams are single pattern or reverse split. The Hot Cam may work with a well designed header and high A/R turbo since that would reduce backpressure.
BTW, I don't really consider a turbo OR hot cam to be top-end. Both come in low in the rpm range as compared to a CC306/centrifugal.
Mike
Re: Turbo charger with hot cam
Originally Posted by engineermike
112 shouldn't be considered low LSA. Most articles say to use 112-114 LSA for turbo, whereas NA would require 104-108.
The problem maybe the duration split. Most turbo cams are single pattern or reverse split. The Hot Cam may work with a well designed header and high A/R turbo since that would reduce backpressure.
BTW, I don't really consider a turbo OR hot cam to be top-end. Both come in low in the rpm range as compared to a CC306/centrifugal.
Mike
The problem maybe the duration split. Most turbo cams are single pattern or reverse split. The Hot Cam may work with a well designed header and high A/R turbo since that would reduce backpressure.
BTW, I don't really consider a turbo OR hot cam to be top-end. Both come in low in the rpm range as compared to a CC306/centrifugal.
Mike
Re: Turbo charger with hot cam
The 224/230 - 112 is a very good blower cam, though most will disagree. However, there was a Procharged Z28 a few years back with 355 cid, ported LT1 heads, ported intake, 18 psi boost, and a 224/230 - 112 cam that pulled 147 mph in the quarter. Just be sure to use 1.6 rockers and/or a high-lift intake lobe.
Re: Turbo charger with hot cam
Originally Posted by engineermike
The 224/230 - 112 is a very good blower cam, though most will disagree. However, there was a Procharged Z28 a few years back with 355 cid, ported LT1 heads, ported intake, 18 psi boost, and a 224/230 - 112 cam that pulled 147 mph in the quarter. Just be sure to use 1.6 rockers and/or a high-lift intake lobe.
Re: Turbo charger with hot cam
kinda out of line but , i am interested in the hotcam and a S/C, how good will a stock motor hold up to the S/c at about 6psi or less...how long will it last and what may be a close guess of RWHP with hotcam headers and S/C at 6psi
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Smokn '94 Z
Drag Racing Technique
16
Aug 4, 2002 06:11 PM
Smokn '94 Z
Drag Racing Technique
12
Jul 28, 2002 02:38 AM



