Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

STS Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 03:01 PM
  #16  
Avengeance's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 71
Re: STS Turbo

Heeeeeerrrre we go again...
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 03:52 PM
  #17  
5.0THIS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 971
From: Colorado
Re: STS Turbo

Originally Posted by Avengeance
Heeeeeerrrre we go again...

I love when STS people get offended when someone else states something about the kit that demonstrates the negative characteristics of such a design.
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 04:14 PM
  #18  
Avengeance's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 71
Re: STS Turbo

Originally Posted by 5.0THIS
I love when STS people get offended when someone else states something about the kit that demonstrates the negative characteristics of such a design.
Im not going to feed your little STS bashing rampage... Ill leave it to you to hijack yet another thread. Have fun kiddo.....
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 08:23 PM
  #19  
5.0THIS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 971
From: Colorado
Re: STS Turbo

Originally Posted by Avengeance
Im not going to feed your little STS bashing rampage... Ill leave it to you to hijack yet another thread. Have fun kiddo.....
I'm not bashing STS at all. You're just pitching a childish fit because I'm pointing out how the kit will behave. I'm sure you're even more pissed that I'm right kiddo
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #20  
blahster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,010
From: North Iowa
Re: STS Turbo

Umm yeah...i designed this thread so that i could get a few little details about the STS Turbo kit. I already know all about the very minimal turbo lag...i know all about the turbo...i just wanted to make sure i wasn't going to have to remove my SFC's. so if you will be so kind as not to point out the negatives about the turbo, and not get into childish arguments, then that would be great. otherwise, just don't even bother posting any replys to this thread. Oh and as for you loving it when STS people get offended...why don't you get off your high horse of "my turbo is better than yours" and go pester someone else's thread. Yeah. don't reply to this post anymore 5.0THIS. I am asking you nicely. don't reply.
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 05:34 PM
  #21  
LukeZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 290
From: South FLA
Re: STS Turbo

http://www.ststurbo.com/inc/iview/264?idx=7&p=8565

That's a pic of my LT1 see more pics on our site. The good thing about the LT1 kit is that all the piping fits very nicely up in the body of the car and leaves no clearance issues. We are in the process of tunning our new 355, and going to see what it will do with the 60-1 and meth before upgrading the to the GT series and adding the FMIC. We have 36# injectors in it now, but the 42s are a good choice and tune nicely too. Definitly go with a tune to make it safe. I ran the LT1 for a year with stock engine and meth, 3psi low boost and 7psi high boost with meth/water.
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 09:28 PM
  #22  
nosfed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 550
From: KC; Where grandma drives in the left lane
Re: STS Turbo

What kind of times are those STS systems running?
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 10:44 PM
  #23  
F8L Z71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 86
From: Sacramento
Re: STS Turbo

Originally Posted by nosfed
What kind of times are those STS systems running?
Depends on how the car/truck is set up and who is driving.
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 11:26 PM
  #24  
blahster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,010
From: North Iowa
Re: STS Turbo

Yeah definitely give me the updated info on the turbo 355 setup. i am planning on rebuilding mine into a 355 as well. maybe 383 stroker, but i haven't decided yet. as far as i can tell i won't have any problems with my subframe connectors...And you say that are no clearance issues? excellent. this is all very good news.
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 12:44 PM
  #25  
trtturbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 76
From: Arlington, Tx.
Re: STS Turbo

blahster, sent you a pm.
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 02:57 PM
  #26  
live2race's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 46
Re: STS Turbo

might i add that i worked for sts for over a year and now that i dont i can still say that they work however they are not as efficient as a front mount, but most people dont want to cramp up their engine compartments more nor are they looking to run 8's so best turbo bang for your buck. i still run my kit as a remote mount however if i want to run faster than my current 10's then i will do something different. i just get tired of people ragging on the design, yes there are some downsides but every system has its +'s and -'s
just wanted to say that for a while
as for the original thread
get that thing tuned and get a wideband cant stress that enough, key is to pull timing out and watch your a/f ratio if you want more than 5 ps1 i recomend the water injection
my 2 cents
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 04:06 PM
  #27  
tjwong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 346
Re: STS Turbo

Originally Posted by live2race
might i add that i worked for sts for over a year and now that i dont i can still say that they work however they are not as efficient as a front mount, but most people dont want to cramp up their engine compartments more nor are they looking to run 8's so best turbo bang for your buck. i still run my kit as a remote mount however if i want to run faster than my current 10's then i will do something different. i just get tired of people ragging on the design, yes there are some downsides but every system has its +'s and -'s
just wanted to say that for a while
as for the original thread
get that thing tuned and get a wideband cant stress that enough, key is to pull timing out and watch your a/f ratio if you want more than 5 ps1 i recomend the water injection
my 2 cents
Plus check out Februarys edition of CHP, the magazine did a full length article about STS. I am sure that there will be some more business generated with that one. Also they won GM's aftermarket design award last year as well. All I can say is that GM thought enough of their design to warrant their award and that means something. I too can say that I don't have any personal experience with their product other than riding in one, and witnessing what I saw of their product in action at SEMA this year. But I did like what I saw and I wouldn't hesistate to recommend a kit to a person that wants some instant gratification on a stock setup. A totally modded setup I am sure will be different but for a stock system I think it would be just fine.
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 01:58 AM
  #28  
CJ's Avatar
CJ
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 221
From: Jacksonville, FL
Re: STS Turbo

Originally Posted by live2race
i ran 12.4 untunned but i feel confident that i am in the low 11's now
So when did you run 10s??? 12.4s out of a turbo 383 sounds pretty crappy to me...
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 03:08 PM
  #29  
5.0THIS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 971
From: Colorado
Re: STS Turbo

Out of curiosity, what are the STS cars running? How about STS owners post up some times
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #30  
F8L Z71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 86
From: Sacramento
Re: STS Turbo

Originally Posted by 5.0THIS
Out of curiosity, what are the STS cars running? How about STS owners post up some times

You purposely said CARS!! Grrrrrr LOL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.