Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

do i need to get rid of my pvc valve?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 09:23 AM
  #1  
4SFEDZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 666
From: A-town, TX
do i need to get rid of my pvc valve?

am i pressurizing my crankcase when im in boost? or does the pvc valve have a 1 way valve?
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #2  
Boosted_Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 690
From: St. Charles, IL
Your are pressurizing the crankcase when in boost, but the PCV valve is a one-way valve...just make sure it is in good condition. A problem that most boosted engines encounter is that they create moderate amounts of blow-by when in boost and unless there is some sort of evacuation system on the motor, it present some problems...mostly oil leaks. Most people have found that just installing a breather on a valve cover isn't addequate and will cause an oily mess under the hood. Search this section for different solutions people have come up with.
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 05:48 PM
  #3  
snorkelface's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,320
From: Alta Loma, CA
Originally Posted by Boosted_Z28
Your are pressurizing the crankcase when in boost, but the PCV valve is a one-way valve...just make sure it is in good condition. A problem that most boosted engines encounter is that they create moderate amounts of blow-by when in boost and unless there is some sort of evacuation system on the motor, it present some problems...mostly oil leaks. Most people have found that just installing a breather on a valve cover isn't addequate and will cause an oily mess under the hood. Search this section for different solutions people have come up with.
Good timing. Take a look at the thread I just resurrected:

https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=475878
Old Jan 6, 2008 | 10:39 AM
  #4  
4SFEDZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 666
From: A-town, TX
Originally Posted by snorkelface
Good timing. Take a look at the thread I just resurrected:

https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=475878
so adding a vacuum to it seems to be the best way? i still like the exhaust vacuum idea tho, what u think?
Old Jan 6, 2008 | 11:29 AM
  #5  
Boosted_Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 690
From: St. Charles, IL
Originally Posted by trouse40
so adding a vacuum to it seems to be the best way? i still like the exhaust vacuum idea tho, what u think?
Are you refering to a system similar to this: http://store.summitracing.com/largei...sum-120108.jpg
Old Jan 6, 2008 | 09:04 PM
  #6  
snorkelface's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,320
From: Alta Loma, CA
Originally Posted by trouse40
so adding a vacuum to it seems to be the best way? i still like the exhaust vacuum idea tho, what u think?
What I've gathered is that a vacuum pump isn't necessarily the best for the street. For the exhaust vacuum method posted above, make sure you have an exhaust with VERY little back pressure as some have reported that having mufflers on their cars caused the system to not work properly.

What will probably do is leave the driver's-side PCV system stock, and then run a line from the passenger-side valve cover through an oil separator, and to the suck side of my turbo. The driver's side will handle the vacuum and cruising speeds, while the passenger-side will do it's job as the boost builds.
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:19 AM
  #7  
mzgp5x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,174
From: MI
Check out GZmotorsports web site. They have some good alternatives for mount and install of vac pumps. Not many options for an LT1. So, that's what I'm doing (V103 pump). I decided to do this, and, it is more invloved than I thought with running a D1 on a 383 LT1. But, now I am 80% there. Had to go with a crank drive and move the rad forward for space on the right side (D1 is on the left). The vac pump requires a modified oil circuit to lube the vanes for the street. So, I have modified alot, but, much of this idea is from the GZMS web site. Also, you can only pull about 10 to 12 Hg on a wet sump system (according to GZMS). So a different Vac regulator was required (inventing that too). Anyway, I got some time to do this. We will see what happens this spring. Really helps to have tools. B. (97ss 383 - D1)
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 07:07 PM
  #8  
Boosted_Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 690
From: St. Charles, IL
Although this is not an inexpensive method to keep the crankcase free of blow-by, it certainly appears to be one of the best. I've run a vacuum pump on other motors and found it to do a fantastic job, but have not tried one on my LT-1 because of the lack of space, especially with an F1-A mounted on the driver's side of the motor. Glad to here you've had some success so far. Any pictures and/or additional information would be great. Keep us updated.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
350350
Fuel and Ignition
14
Aug 11, 2015 12:03 PM
HectorM52
Parts Wanted
0
Jul 19, 2015 08:55 PM
JCSWS6
Parts For Sale
0
Jul 19, 2015 06:47 PM
94Form
LT1 Based Engine Tech
12
Jul 17, 2015 10:56 PM
Catmaigne
Parts For Sale
0
Jul 14, 2015 05:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 PM.